similar to: asterisk dials random number when receiving incoming call

Hello sip show peers does not mark hosts as NAT even though sip.conf and sip_peers table has nat=yes. spitfire*CLI> sip show peers Name/username Host Dyn Nat ACL Mask Port Status voipuser.org/gdsm 216.127.66.119 N 255.255.255.255 5060 Unmonitored 5560/5560 192.168.4.5 D N A 255.255.255.255 5060

Hello everyone. I can place outgoing calls no problem with my IP500 (using teliax as our provider). Thing is, when a call comes in, 90% of the time when I pick up the handset it drops the call immediately. I turned on SIP debug, and have listed my extension config from sip.conf. Any help is greatly appreciated.... sooo close.... TIA! -Ron [3004] type=friend username=3004 password=XXX

I do get problems with name resolution accross subnet bounderies. I have a working and wins server and to demonstrate the problem I paste the debug output of mount /smbhome/ opts: uid=1000 opts: gid=1000 mount.smbfs started (version 2.2.2debian-2) added interface ip=192.168.6.2 bcast=192.168.6.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name Tri-st-s001<0x20>

Hi Peter, As Rowland pointed out in a previous post to you "Each DC should use its own ipaddress for its nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf", so the gateway IP should not be there. So make /etc/resolv.conf on DC01 nameserver 192.168.4.5 search internal.kcs and /etc/resolv.conf on DC02 nameserver 192.168.4.6 search internal.kcs If you use the internal dns backend add the following to

Hi list, First let me give something about my network structure 192.168.4.0-->192.168.4.3(BDC) | VPN GATEWAY | Internet | VPN GATEWAY | 192.168.5.0-->192.168.5.3 (PDC) Right now I'm having 192.168.5.3(SAMBA+LDAP PDC) and WINS server, and I want to build a BDC (192.168.4.3) on the other side of the VPN. my questions are: 1. is it possible? 2. is BDC needs to be setup as a WINS server

A number of weeks ago I had huge help from many of you configuring routing on a server with multiple Internet facing nics. Thanks for all of your help!!!! I am still having a routing issue that I am hoping someone can help me tweek. This server, besides acting as our gateway to the internet, is also our web and email server. The server has 4 nics. Two are connected to the internet and the

I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS resolution is a little slow. I'm looking into why that is and tried an ns lookup for google.com and got the answer SERVFAIL on my AD server. The query was then passed to my next nameserver (google's own dns), which handled the query. Is this correct behaviour? I've not seen SERVFAIL before itadmin at

To get the question of why new servers, this one I'm using has hardware whose remaining life is measured in days. The elastic bands and sticky tape it is held together with won't hold for much longer. I'm using it to build and test a new environment, but then I need to migrate that onto something with a little more vitality before bringing it into production (in the next 56 hours). As

I had a major HD failure and need to rebuild my host server and the virtual servers that resided on it. I am moving from CentOS 5.6 to CentOS 6.3. I am using the same configuration, as best as I can tell, that was working only hours ago on 5.6 but does not work on 6.3. My guest server can see network traffic on the bridged network device but I cannot seem to interact with it. Iptables turned

I think it?s the cache. When you where sleeping the cache got updated. But I can be wrong Philip > On 5 Sep 2020, at 12:35, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 05/09/2020 09:53, Peter Pollock via samba wrote: >> I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but DNS >> resolution is a little slow. >> >>

Thank you everyone for your help. I corrected my resolv.conf files as Peter Milesson suggested and then had to take a number of extra steps so now things are looking a little better. In case it helps anyone else in the future, here's what I found (plus I am now having problems resolving internal addresses). As far as I can see, the setup on both servers is identical (except they use their own

I fell asleep at my desk... and now it's working fine. I have no idea what was wrong or why it magically fixed itself. On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 3:36 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 05/09/2020 09:53, Peter Pollock via samba wrote: > > I have just set up a new AD and am having a little success with it, but > DNS > > resolution is a

After reboot, the problem came back again. Server refuses to resolve external names without "nameserver 8.8.8.8" in resolv.conf and gives the same SERVFAIL message when doing nslookup On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 9:02 AM Philip Offermans via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I think it?s the cache. When you where sleeping the cache got updated. But > I can be wrong

Hello, I've read chapter 4 [and all other chapters btw] of the Samba by Example latest version online and the mailing list archives and have a question re: domain name resolution. If I have a domain 'AD.NET' I can setup a zone in Bind with an SRV record and my XP Pro clients can find the domain controller and join the domain. A simple zone looks like this: $ttl 38400 ad.net. IN

I have two samba machines, one has the problem I describe in the earlier mail. The other works much better and also there I have the (same) smb.conf: egrep '^[^;]' /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] printing = cups printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes guest account = nobody invalid users = root security = domain workgroup = TRITECH server string = %h

I am having an issue with a new samba setup. My gateway server (H1 - the new setup) is running Samba and acting as my networks wins server. It also houses my email and web server. It is connected to a private network to another server (H3) running Samba acting as my main file server. The issue that I am experiencing is that H3 can view our webpage that is hosted on H1 but my Windows machines

I use the samba-2.2.2-2 debian package and try to set up authentification via winbind. I have use this smb.conf: egrep '^[^;]' /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] printing = cups printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes guest account = nobody invalid users = root security = domain workgroup = TRITECH server string = %h server (Samba %v) syslog only = no

..and also, kinit fails if I don't have 192.168.4.5 as the first nameserver in resolv.conf On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:26 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 05/09/2020 17:54, Peter Pollock via samba wrote: > > Please forgive me, I'm not sure what terminology to use here so this > > question may sound wrong. > > > > I have

Do you have something like this in your smb.conf? dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 Regards > Am 05.09.2020 um 23:39 schrieb Peter Pollock via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > ?..and also, kinit fails if I don't have 192.168.4.5 as the first nameserver > in resolv.conf > >> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 10:26 AM Rowland penny via samba < >> samba at

I would have added an extra DC.. Move FSMO Removed old server from AD, Cleanup AD. Install new server with new ip's. And Add CNAMEs where needed, Move FSMO back. Remove extra DC. ;-) Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 4 september 2020 10:00 >