Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "To mock or not mock base classes"
2008 Jul 25
21
Problems with mock assigned to a constant
Hi all,
Initially I thought this was a bug in the built-in mocking framework(and it
still may be), but I better hash it out on the mailing list before I
file/reopen the ticket:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/478-mocks-on-constants#ticket-478-6
I thought my example illustrated my problem, but obviously I was passing the
wrong arguments to the mock. I revised my example to
2007 Aug 14
4
(no subject)
How would you spec out something like the following:
def a_method
x = Class.new do
include Enumerable
end
# do something here with x
end
describe "The Anonymous Class" do
before :each do
@anonymous_class = mock Class
Class.stub!(:new).and_return @anonymous_class
end
it "should create a new anonymous class" do
2007 Aug 16
3
Mocking a non-existent method
I don''t like this:
i = mock(Integer)
i.should_receive(:asdfasdf).and_return(''foo'')
puts i.asdfasdf
Shouldn''t rspec check to see that :asdfasdf is a valid message to be
sending Integer?
Joe
2007 Dec 06
6
mock libraries, Object#send, and Object#__send__
What is the appropriate way to stub out (and put an expectation on
Object#__send__), without getting warnings from the Rspec mock library?
Scott
2007 Apr 20
5
stubbing with and without a string
What is the difference between these two ways of mocking (with and
without the string):
mock(''Object'')
and
mock(Object)
?
Scott
2007 Apr 17
8
Verifying that a block calls a method
I have something like the following:
def my_fun
my_fun2 do
raise Error
end
end
I know that I can verify that the method receives my_fun2. How can I
mock/stub out the example to verify that it calls raise Error?
Scott
2007 Mar 24
15
State Based vs. Behaviour Based Spec/Testing
I''ve notice that a project like Rubinius has both a spec & a test
directory. Rspec has only a spec directory. Obviously I support
BDD, but isn''t there also a place for state based/verification
testing? I sometimes sense that I *do* want to practice Test Driven
Development. That is, I want some assurance that my production code
will run as intended. But I also
2007 Aug 14
4
Stubbing all methods
Mocha''s mock/stub framework has the ability to stub all methods on a
mock given. Does RSpec''s mocking framework have this ability? And
if not, is there some reason it shouldn''t be implemeneted?
Regards,
Scott
2007 May 17
4
How to mock helpers in view specs ?
Hi all,
I am mocking the following Rails view (inside a partial):
<%= render :partial => "forums/forum",
:collection => forum_category.forums.readable_by(current_user? ?
current_user : nil) %>
My spec fails with the following message:
1)
ActionView::TemplateError in ''forum_categories/index (anonymous user)
should only render forums accessible to anonymous
2009 Feb 25
2
How to properly mock a complex object "comment.initiator.group.name"?
I am wondering what is the best way to mock such expression:
"comment.initiator.group.name"
What I do now is:
===========================
comment = mock_model(Comment)
initiator = mock_model(User)
group = mock_model(Group, :name => "Admin")
initiator.stub!(:group).and_return(group)
comment.stub!(:initiator).and_return(initiator)
===========================
So it becomes
2006 Oct 23
6
overriding mock expectations
There is one annoyance I''m encountering with the Mock API in rSpec.
Overall it works well, as far as dynamic mocks go ;)... but there''s
this one thing... It doesn''t allow overriding of expectations.
example:
m = mock("blah")
m.should_receive(:one).any_number_of_times().and_return(1)
m.should_receive(:one).and_return(1)
The second call to should_receive
2006 Nov 10
2
mock syntax order
I have the following statement
mock_requester.should_receive(:request_with).with
("x").any_number_of_times.and_return(@object)
which works fine, but when i do it backwards, which makes the same
amount of sense syntactically, it fails
mock_requester.should_receive(:request_with).with("x").and_return
(@object).any_number_of_times
are all of the mock options
2007 Apr 30
4
Mocking with Calculated Results
I am setting up an AR mock object and wanted to sanity check it. My
intent is to mix this into all my examples and then override/add
methods where necessary. Note that I''ve anticipated three cases for
find:
find with one numeric argument => object
find with :all => Array
find with anything else => nil
This roughly approximates how ActiveRecord::find works in this case
2008 Mar 05
7
mocking successive return values
I''m having a problems mocking successive return values. I don''t know
if I''m doing something wrong or if this is a limitation of rspec
mocks. Any ideas of what I may be doing wrong?
I''m trying to test the generate_quote_number method. It generates a
quote number, looks to see if it is in the db already. If it is, it
calls itself to try again. I want
2007 Oct 08
6
stub actions that depend on the parameter
Hi,
I''m pretty new to all related to bdd and rspec and I have the following
question. Is it possible to stub actions that return different objects
depending on the parameteres they were called with? Something like this:
MyClass.stub!(:method).with(1).and_return(@mock_object_1)
MyClass.stub!(:method).with(2).and_return(@mock_object_2)
I know I could use
2007 Aug 31
48
Deprecating the mocking framework?
I saw in one of Dave C.''s comments to a ticket that "our current plan
is to deprecate the mocking framework." I hadn''t heard anything about
that, but then again I haven''t paid super close attention to the list.
Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using Mocha
(or any other framework one might want to plug in?).
Pat
2007 Aug 07
2
stubs which yield and return
Is there any reason why a stub couldn''t both yield and return? I''m
looking for a way to mock out a class I''ve made named "AnonymousClass":
class AnonymousClass
def initialize(&blk)
@klass = Class.new
@klass.instance_eval(&blk) if block_given?
end
def new
@klass.new
end
def evaluate(&blk)
2007 Jul 18
5
Mocking Rails association collections
Rails model association collections allow you to do nifty things like:
article.comments.find(:all, :conditions => {:created_at > 1.day.ago})
Has anyone found a good way to mock this up? I''m currently doing this:
@comment1 = mock_model(Comment)
comments = mock(Array)
comments.stub!(:find).and_return([@comment1])
@article = mock_model(Article)
2007 Oct 25
1
Mocking/Stubbing help with subdomain as account key
My app uses account_location to set up subdomains as account keys. In
my controllers, all my model operations are scoped through the
@current_person object.
The question is: How do I test this with RSpec''s mocking and
stubbing? Basically, I need to test that @current_person.things is
getting the find message and returning @thing. I''ve tried stubbing
and mocking
2007 Sep 30
9
Problems with testing nested routes using mocking
Hello forum
I have there to files
#----- virtual_host_controller.rb
class VirtualHostsController < ApplicationController
before_filter :capture_domain
# GET /domain/1/virtual_hosts/1
def show
@virtual_host = @domain.virtual_hosts.find(params[:id])
respond_to do |format|
format.html # show.rhtml
end
end
private
def capture_domain
if