similar to: Interconnecting two lans using Asterisk over a PSTN

Hello Samba experts, Please read all email because i'm desperate!!!!! I have problem on joining to LAN-s using Samba. Finally i got a solution to "see" booth workgroups on "Entire Network", but i'm having problem with stations located in LAN2. From any station located in LAN1, I can see LAN2 workgroup and the browse list with stations located in LAN2, but when

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

Hi, this is my Linux Box ---------------------------- LAN 1 -----|--eth1 <---br1--->eth0.1 | | \ | | eth0--|----- 802.1q tagged 1 Mbps link | / | LAN 2 -----|--eth2 <---br2--->eth0.2 | ---------------------------- I have to bridge the 2 lans

Hi, We have a 256 kbits/s (kilobits per second) link to the internet. it is a router running Linux that belongs to our ISP. They have given us 8 internet ips. (i.e- subnet is 255.255.255.248). one has been given to this router. I have given another internet ip to the firewall running CentOS 4.5. iptables is running on it. And also, I have installed iproute2 pkg as well. pls see below for

Dear Friends, I have been using shorewall for some years. I want to set up "shorewall 2" router behind firewall, accordind to this picture: I have lost at setuping "zone"-s (wifi, lan1, net). Plese help me ! Thanks, psw net | | SHOREWALL 1 ------- lan 1 | | |wifi | | SHOREWALL 2 ------- lan 2 | ---------------- lan 3

 Hello, everybody.  This one''s got me stumped.  What I''m trying to do is have two networks--192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0--with SMB and WINS running between them.  So far I can mount SMB shares allright, but I can''t browse by WINS names across the router.  I''ve posted this question on Linuxquestions.org; you''ll find the details there.  Here are my

An very interesting test did yesterday that, LAN1 and LAN2 setup an tinc VPN which is quite simple(the physical link between tinc nodes are quite stable/fast), and no any application traffic to go through the tinc. Later, I setup smokeping which LAN1 initial 20 ping to LAN2 on a per-minute basis, but as you saw from the below picture, it had packet drop. But if I perform a constantly ping from

Many thanks for the help to date. I now have a working vpn with three nodes: 10.20.30.1 10.20.40.1 10.20.50.1 Each machine can see each other machine 100's of miles apart from each other. Each machine is behind its own router. The machines are on their own subnets, as well, of course. The individual IP's on the lans of the nodes are: 192.168.0.155 (corresponds to 10.20.30.1)

Hi, list members. I''ve been reading a lot about traffic control because at work we have the following configuration...... LINUX BOX _____ 100 mbit | | LAN1--------------|eth0 | | | 2 mbit SDSL | eth1|-------------------INTERNET 100 mbit | | LAN2--------------|eth2 | | | ------- The linux box (REDHAT 9-2.4.20-30.9) acts as a firewall-NAT solution for both

Hello! I've got a problem with DNS,VPN and SAMBA. I do have 3 Linux servers on distinct subnets. (192.168.1.1 ,192.168.2.1 and 192.168.3.1). I have done a VPN between the 3 subnets and I could do a ping from 192.168.1.1 to the others without problems. Each sever has 2 network cards. One of them is connected to ADSL.

I have the following situation: A Linux 2.4.22 server: Physical ethernet: lan1 - Ethernet port (Internet) lan2 - Ethernet port (Cisco Switch, Trunk port) Tunnel: tap1 - OpenVPN in tcp-server mode VLAN's: lan2.201 lan2.202 lan2.203 tap1.201 tap1.202 tap1.203 Bridges: br201 (lan2.201, tap1.201) br202 (lan2.202, tap1.202) br203 (lan2.203, tap1.203) On the other end, the same type of server:

On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:07:53PM +0200, Hans Schultz wrote: > Not true, it reveals that I forgot to put it in the patch, that's all. As > I cannot run several of these tests because of memory constraints I link > the file to a copy in a rw area where I modify the list and just run one > of the subtests at a time. If I try to run the whole it always fails > after a couple of

Hi, I'm using linux 2.6.21.5 and our kernel is freeze. The problem is, if I create a Software bridge using $brctl command. and add two interfaces say, eth0.0 and eth0.1 using $brctl addbr br-lan $brctl addif br-lan eth0.0 $brctl addif br-lan eth0.1 and when i send traffic from a host connected to one port to host connected at other end, soon all the memory is dried up and and kernel

Hi Friends, I am running Centos 5 64-bit on a Dell sever. I am trying to configure iptables for smtp traffic for which I need some help/guidance. The scenario is like this: On a linux box we have 3 public ips(eth1,eth2 and eth3) and 1 LAN IP(eth0). 2 public IPs are from the same service provider and 1 is from different service provider. eth3 and eth2 are from the same public provider but

I've been using asterisk for 3+ years now, I love it, but it doesnt love me back. :-) It was crashing frequently and seemingly randomly prior to this latest upgrade. Not sure what version it was running prior to upgrade (it was probably an old CVS HEAD from 2+ years go.) Anyway, currently running 1.4.21.2. == Problem == Problem is that its crashing for seemingly no reason at all, no

I would like to route ssh in my network via DSL2 and all other trafic via DSL1. So far I menaged to do it for LAN2 but there are still WLAN1,LAN3 and LAN1 to go. On all routers I added table "pilicka" with rule for fwmark and I fwmarked ssh. # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup pilicka 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup

I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a "single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges.

2008/9/29 Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com> > Try this: > > exten => _XXXX,1,Set(THISTECH=${CUT(CHANNEL,/,1)}) > exten => _XXXX,n,NoOp(Technology is ${THISTECH}) > exten => _XXXX,n,Set(THISCHANNEL=${CUT(CHANNEL,/,2)}) > exten => _XXXX,n,NoOp(Channel is ${THISCHANNEL}) Hi, I don't have any spare zaptel enabled system I could try this on, but I

I've been scratching my head trying to think of a way to do this, but without success yet. I'm using the Manager API. If I have two channels linked to each other (i.e. direct connection), or even if they are independent channels, I can transfer them both to the same extension by using Action: Redirect and using Channel: for one and ExtraChannel: for the other. This is most useful for