similar to: QoS on CentOS 4

what a better snmp app for centos? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051221/afea793d/attachment-0001.html>

Has anyone done configuration of apache webserver with Tomcat 5.5.7 I cannot integrate them together?> Any help will be appreciated Regards Vaneet Vaneet Sharma executive manager iDeasTank Limited an iwg business dolphins'' court po 388 valletta, m-malta/europe mobile: +356 9943 8263 skype: CALLVANEET fax: +356 9952 8888 phone: +356 9942 8888 vaneet@iwg.info call me on

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

I'm sitting here working away on various unrelated projects and watching patch after patch after patch flow in from Timo to fix all sorts of problems people are reporting. A coding madman on fire. Thanks Timo, you rock. I appreciate the time you spend on this software, I'm sure everyone else does as well. :) -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com

Team, Is anyone aware of a Red Hat Network alike system of server package update status that could be adapted for CentOS3? I'm not interested in the complete management aspect (channels, scheduling remote updates, etc) but merely the ability to see your list of systems and determine which are out of date with XXX packages. If you happen to manage a large-ish number of RHES3 systems, you

Build team -- what's our current outlook on the 4 Final release shaping up to be (ie, this week, next week, a month..)? Should it be further out, would it be relatively painless to 'upgrade' (so to speak) from the current RC1 to Final when it rolls around? thanks! -te (I have a new project server waiting in limbo, would like to at least get started - nonproduction) -- Troy

We're going to replace an older Solaris7/Netbackup/TapeRobot server with a new Centos box using backup-to-disk-to-tape (probably using Arkeia). The specs are up in the air, but generally: - CentOS/RHEL friendly (3Ware SATA? SCSI?) - 2U/3U/4U-ish form factor - hotswap RAID5 - dual PS, hotswap a plus - USB2.0 port(s) (*) To give you an idea of where I'm starting to look, take a gander at

I have a linux server connecto into a 100mps LAN, i use iptables implementation of shorewall (shorewall.net) and then I used the wondershaper. When I adjusted the values below, I got a download speed for vsftp at a whooping 1187.91 KB/s but a upload speed is only a painful 27 KB/s. I dont fully understand the underpinng codes behind the wondershaper htb stuff. can someone guide me on how can i

Playing with the new idxview I got this error running against my INBOX dovecot.index.cache file. What exactly does it mean? Full output: # /usr/libexec/dovecot/idxview dovecot.index.cache -- INDEX: dovecot.index.cache version = 1.8 base header size = 0 header size = 1170103198 record size = 1170103283 compat flags = 7 index id = 0 flags = 26512 uid validity = 0 next uid = 2460778624 messages

I just installed Xandros 2.0 Desktop. I used apt-get to install iproute. I then downloaded wondershaper 1.1a from the website. I edited the script as the readme says. I went to console and started the wondershaper script...and i get the following error messages. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid Argument many times. Any ideas what is wrong? MArk _______________________________________________

I'm reading the wiki et el. regarding indexes, but can't come up with a coherent answer to the setup and what will happen. I want to take the indexes and move them off of NFS (~/Maildir) and place in /var/spool/dovecot/indexes, but not have to hand create everything (user homes, mail folders) So, I create a parent folder /var/spool/dovecot/indexes that has the appropriate permissions

Hello Thilo, What did you find superior with CBQ-wondershaper over HTB-wondershaper? We have not been using wondershaper specifically but our simple tests so far seem to show that htb is much easier to configure for a given target shape (i.,e accurate) compared to CBQ. Torsten -----Original Message----- From: Thilo Schulz [mailto:arny@ats.s.bawue.de] Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 8:55 AM To:

A new employee started today, when logging into his new mailbox this morning during a walk-through I got a nasty server error response in Thunderbird - something I never see, DC runs smooth as butter for us. Checking the server log I see this: == snip == dovecot: Jul 09 09:38:54 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxx): Maildir /home/x/xxxxxxx/Maildir sync: UIDVALIDITY changed (1183406107 -> 1183999134)

hello all, i am trying to rpmbuild samba source 3.0.11-1 and ran into this error and can not figure out what is wrong. the follow error as follows libads/kerberos_keytab.c: In function `ads_keytab_flush'': libads/kerberos_keytab.c:429: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See

I'm trying to recompile the source RPM from the FC3 version of cvs (http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/3/i386/SRPMS.updates/cvs-1.11.17-4.src.rpm), as the version shipped on RHEL/CentOS/etc has a known bug (version 1.11.2-unix "cvs watch on" doesn't work). The initial configure is failing with this obscure error: configure:2257: checking for C compiler default output file

Here's a strange one. I have a user who's using Thunderbird 2.0.0 and assigning multiple tags (keywords) to emails, which are getting "lost" (I'll explain) when he leaves the folder and comes back. I can reproduce this on *his* account myself, but cannot reproduce it on *my* account (separate new TBird 2.0.0 profiles on Windows XP). Use the two TBird default tags

Hi all! I am trying to get dovecot-1.0.rc15 to create files with mode 660 in my virtual mailboxes. I set umask=0007 in dovecot.conf, restarted dovecot (/etc/init.d/dovecot restart) and send me an e-mail but it is still 600. "dovecot -n" says "umask: 7" How come the zeros are not displayed? Is this by intention or is something wrong? Here is the complete output: #

I have a need to use the unsupported kernel for one feature only (AFP/Appletalk support). Never having had to use it before, I''m unsure of what''s all in it other than reading it''s config file. From those that do use it -- is it considered stable enough to use in lightweight production? I''m debating the use of it versus wasting my time rebuilding the normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 hi there, what''s difference between wonder shaper and htb/tc? http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ please advice. regards, /vicky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBfuS9pbZvCIJx1bcRAl27AKCldJljOgC89SPKAmPMM4Vwitc3IACdFS3s

Hi I am very unclear about the wonder shaper and a bit of a novice with Unix all together I have a question for you and I hope you can answer Basically my office is getting a couple of people slowing down the network so ive been looking around and found wondershaper What I want to know is that can I rather than having low priority ports have it with high priority ports And