similar to: OSCAR for Centos vote

I have noticed that fftw has recently been updated from major version 2 to major version 3. It seems the update stems from the mother distribution from RedHat. AFAIK, there are changes to the API in fftw version 3, which may give problems with 3rd party packages. Has anyone got experience with this? And any advice to offer? Cheers, Morten -- Morten Kjeldgaard, Asc. professor, Ph.D.

I am a bit puzzled at the versioning scheme of the RedHat clone family. RedHat seems to use integer 4, Tao and Centos does the same. If you do rpm -q --qf '%{version}\n' -f /etc/redhat-release you get '4'. However, Scientific Linux uses 4.0, and that seems to me to be a more logical choise, since presumable there are going to be versions 4.1, 4.2, etc. Is there any good

From: Morten Kjeldgaard <mok at bioxray.dk> > I am a bit puzzled at the versioning scheme of the RedHat clone family. > RedHat seems to use integer 4, Tao and Centos does the same. If you do > rpm -q --qf '%{version}\n' -f /etc/redhat-release > you get '4'. > However, Scientific Linux uses 4.0, and that seems to me to be a more > logical choise, since

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Apr 13, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Devang Patel wrote: > >> + <tr><td>Jeff Cohen</td><th> >> + Oscar</th> >> + <td>Oscar = Open Source Compiler And Runtime</td></tr> >> > > Perfect, and very nice backronym. Unfortunately, Wikipedia says: > > >> Both Oscar

Hi, I am having a strange problem, where I cannot get pam_access to work as intended. I have placed the following line in /etc/pam.d/system-auth account required /lib/security/pam_access.so Then, in /etc/security/access.conf, I have put the following line: -:mok:10.14.44.104 I.e. I should prevent myself from logging on from host 10.14.44.104. However, when I try to log on (using

On Apr 13, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Devang Patel wrote: > + <tr><td>Jeff Cohen</td><th> > + Oscar</th> > + <td>Oscar = Open Source Compiler And Runtime</td></tr> Perfect, and very nice backronym. Unfortunately, Wikipedia says: > Both Oscar and Academy Award are registered trademarks of the > Academy [of Motion Picture Arts

Hi I am after a solution where i can easily kickstart many, read hundreds, of boxes in a short time frame. Perhaps the way i install software is to actually re-kix the box with a new software baseline - that type of idea. I have looked at rocks and it looks good but it seems a little rigid in that i need to be able to determine certain things like hostname etc as in our env hostname

Hi, I'm totally new with centos...we have a cluster in our labo with centos oscar. The gcc which was provided with the release is gcc41 and gfortran41. There are packages for gcc44 and gfortran44. I have installed them. But the gcc is not a link to gcc41 or gcc44. it is just an executable. idem for gfortran. So which is the good way on centOS to choose the gcc44 and gfortran44 per default.

Hello, There was no problem installing "APT" package in CentOS 4.0 Beta, but so far I could not install APT or Synaptic by "# yum install apt" or by "# yum install synaptic" in a usual manner. Is there any solution for this? It seems to me, something is wrong only for these two packages. Regards.

From: Christopher Snow <cs at m0n0.co.uk> > If that's the case, shouldn't the credit vote go to Fedora? Disclaimer: This is 100% my _opinion_ (don't take it otherwise) 1. Credit At some point a lot of credit can go to a lot of projects. Yes, many are thanx to Red Hat -- by far the largest of any commercial entity. But then many are thanx to many maintainers in general.

Hi everybody, after the initial positive community review of the http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Mirage_Incubation_Project_Proposal, it is time to have a formal vote. Who can vote? - Project leads of Mature Xen.org projects - Committers of Mature Xen.org projects - Others can register their vote in support of the project, but the vote is not binding. How to vote? - Vote via the voting form at

Dear Guru''s, I''ld like to request you to vote here http://launchpad.enterprise2conf.com/node/74 as 5 star (please click on 5 star to vote), this will give oxygen to our project. Waiting for your valuable vote. Best Regards, Pavan Agrawal

The Linux Journal's 2002 Readers' Choice poll is open. Vorbis is featured in the Favorite Audio Tool category, so go vote for your favorite codec! Actually, you even have the choice of voting for "ogg123" or for "Vorbis Tools", since it seems someone at Linux Journal is not quite aware of what Vorbis Tools contain. I suggest voting for "Vorbis Tools", so that

On the feature list for next languages to be supported by the App engine, ruby is losing to php. please go vote for ruby... http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/list?q=rails&updated=29&ts=1243221608 just "star" it and who knows we might win the race...

Our discussion and editing period has come to and end and it's time to vote! You can find the poll here: http://forum.go-compiz.org/viewtopic.php?t=286 Please read the whole post as the selection procedure is outlined below the poll. May the best graphic win!

Ok I have to get a vote of all the people that are going to come to Cluecon so we order the beer keg's for the developers board room. Anyone have any preference? (if you haven't registered for ClueCon now is the time to register!) Choices... choices... choices... I want Red Bull on tap! /b --- Anakin: ?You?re either with me, or you?re my enemy.? Obi-Wan: ?Only a Sith could be an

Should SipPhone support ISN routing for their 747 ITAD? Cast a vote: http://forums.gizmo5.com/viewtopic.php?t=10197 Meanwhile if you're interested, you can use the Nerd Vittles 'bandit' ITAD #1089 to call a SipPhone/Gizmo5 subscriber via ISN, which I think is clever (Karl tips his hat to Ward Mundy) and it's also really, really funny.

From: Simon Perreault <nomis80 at lqt.ca> > Isn't it acceptable for Red Hat to sell SLAs on a per-computer basis? > I really don't get where you're going. The main problem people have in understanding RHEL is that they don't understand it is a subscription with guarantees and, optionally, service level agreements (SLAs). It's _not_ a product at all. Red Hat has

From: me at prestoncrawford.com > They could not do the latter as far as I understand it. Because > Fedora Core is not the source code (letter for letter) of RHEL. From: "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org>" > Every RHEL package as a 1:1 version to Fedora, typically Fedora > Core, possibly Fedora Development (as it seems MySQL 4 was). > This is fact. Nothing

Gentlemen, My choice is wireframe 1. Regarding the search function, there are three levels or modules to choose from plus a 'define-your-own' level. If a pre- defined search function is used initially, let's hope our admin can easily redefine it later as needed. The structure of this thing allows for assigning areas of responsibility, kind of like sub-admin functions. This would