similar to: Problem parsing unusual SIP/SDP

> Asterisk Project Security Advisory - ASA-2007-010 > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Product | Asterisk | > |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| > | Summary | Two stack buffer overflows in SIP

> Asterisk Project Security Advisory - ASA-2007-010 > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Product | Asterisk | > |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| > | Summary | Two stack buffer overflows in SIP

Hello everyone. I'm struggling to get T.38 faxing to work in Asterisk 1.6.1.13 with a SIP DID provider here in Brazil (GVT - Vox IP service). Here's my scenario: When faxes arrive by a specific DID, they are routed thru this simple macro: [macro-recebefax] exten => s,1,Set(DB(fax/count)=$[${DB(fax/count)} + 1]) exten => s,n,Set(FAXCOUNT=${DB(fax/count)}) exten =>

Hi Dirk, I too would need to get R-devel on my Ubuntu box (alongside an existing R installation) to check my packages, especially given the mayhem that awaits us when the new `R CMD check --as-cran` goes live. ( http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/doc/html/NEWS.html ) I was wondering if the script that you posted on r-sig-debian a couple years back was still valid. More however, I'd like to

Hello, all. I have an asterisk 2.3.2 and a Sangoma interface through which I connected an external PSTN line. I use it as carrier for VoIP calls. I can make successfully calls, but there's one problem, I receive 200 OK with SDP with delay (sometimes more than 30 seconds). So when I make a call through asterisk I receive intially: - 100 Trying - 183 Session Progress, with SDP when the called

Hi List Asterisk 16.28.0 in use. PJSIP in use Two endpoints Both using IPv6 One Endpoint on UDP, the other via TLS. Both with: t38_udptl=yes ;fax_detect=yes ;fax_detect_timeout=30 rtp_ipv6=yes Both sides are T.38 capable and detect fax tone so no need for fax detection on asterisk. Voice calls between the two work fine. But on a Fax call, I see this situation: A <=> Asterisk

Hello, I think I met a case similar to the one solved by [1] . Quoting this case : * res_pjsip: Handle deferred SDP hold/unhold properly. Some SIP devices indicate hold/unhold using deferred SDP reinvites. In other words, they provide no SDP in the reinvite. A typical transaction that starts hold might look something like this: * Device sends reinvite with no SDP * Asterisk

I have been sending OPTIONS requests 1) programatically (my own code), 2)manually via SIP VERIFY PEER x and 3)automatcially by setting verify=yes in sip.conf. The trouble is I do not see anything except an ACK 200 come back from endpoints and it does not contain any SDP/codec info. . My goal is to determine audio and video codec capability in advance of a call INVITE. I notice in both 2 and 3

We're dialing a disconnected number via Level 3's vector network, and are receiving this. The response has SDP in it. Apparently, Level 3 is playing early media. Asterisk doesn't seem to know what to do with SDP in a 180 RINGING, and just plays ringing. What am I missing here? How can Asterisk see there's SDP, early media, in the response and act accordingly? SIP/2.0 180

Hi everyone, I am sending out a multicast page using the following in my dialplan: Page(MulticastRTP/linksys/${MULTICAST_IP_ADDR}:6061/${MULTICAST_IP_ADDR}:6061,q) Everything works great, but I had a question about SIP and SDP: Should I be seeing a SIP/SDP message from the asterisk server containing media information and the multicast IP address? On wireshark, I see SIP/SDP from the admin

Hello list when trying to set up webRTC communications with sipjs client package (tried 0.7.0, 0.10.0 and 0.19.0), I see in the asterisk debug log-file the following : DEBUG[30891][C-00000000] chan_sip.c: Processing media-level (audio) SDP c=IN IP4 99.88.77.66... OK. DEBUG[30891][C-00000000] chan_sip.c: Processing media-level (audio) SDP a=rtcp:9 IN IP4 0.0.0.0... UNSUPPORTED OR FAILED.

Actually, there was recently a bug fixed regarding multipart SDP parsing in chan_sip. That should have fixed the issue with CS1000s and SIP (among other things). I haven't actually tried it yet on my CS1000, but it should work. Regards, - Brad ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com on behalf of Jerry Geis Sent: Tue 12/26/2006 3:51 PM To:

Asterisk receives a 180 Ringing with SDP from the called side, then it sends 180 without SDP to the calling side. We would like asterisk to sends to the calling side the same response that was received from the called side. This is Asterisk cert 13.1, is that a new behavior, is there a setting to change this ? ?

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2018-002 Product Asterisk Summary Crash when given an invalid SDP media format description Nature of Advisory Remote crash Susceptibility Remote

I have a box (Genband) expecting the following: 100 trying 180 ringing with SDP Or 100 trying 183 with SDP And asterisk is sending: 100 trying 180 ringing 183 with SDP Any way to modify asterisk to send what he is expecting? Thanks, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I was testing with sdp and something came up worth asking: While calling from a webrtc client to another (chrome, sip.js) Asterisk receives the following sdp and rejects it with 488 Not Acceptable. Why does this happen, what's wrong with the sdp? The second sdp body below is accepted instead. Both have rtp profile RTP/SAVPF, difference is that the second one was produced by rtpengine,

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2013-004 Product Asterisk Summary Remote Crash From Late Arriving SIP ACK With SDP Nature of Advisory Remote Crash Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity Major

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2016-008 Product Asterisk Summary Crash on SDP offer or answer from endpoint using Opus Nature of Advisory Remote Crash Susceptibility Remote

Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2013-004 Product Asterisk Summary Remote Crash From Late Arriving SIP ACK With SDP Nature of Advisory Remote Crash Susceptibility Remote Unauthenticated Sessions Severity Major

Hi, We have some Asterisk servers that we are moving behind a NAT to preserve public addresses and make room for growth. This is Asterisk 1.4 NAT works very good with the externip/localnet-setting when we are connected directly to our teleco. But when I try to use NAT and put them behind our Kamailio something interesting happens: The media-address in the SDP is the internal ip and not the