similar to: Intermittent volume deterioration in conferences

These allow and disallow work with NuFone for me disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=alaw allow=gsm Jeff Message: 11 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:15:51 +0100 From: "Edward Banfa" <edward@radform.com> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] NuFone Configuration [problem] To: "'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>

This question is directed towards those who are familiar with the inner workings of the Asterisk code. I'm quite at home hacking on the source code, and have become familiar with certain parts of Asterisk's operation. I'm looking for some advice on the most fruitful avenues to explore in order to achieve a particular application I need: either in the source code or in AGI (with which

Just a trivial question: was the term "Meetme" invented for Asterisk as something like a brand name for its conferencing? Or was it an existing generic term for dial-in conferencing? Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

Thanks for the suggestion Tony, I installed each codec for MoH, core sounds, and extra sound packages. Unfortunately the tests produce the same results. [Sep 1 20:36:45] ERROR[10081][C-00007fe5]: frame.c:343 ast_frdup: FRACK!, Failed assertion Excessive refcount 100000 reached on ao2 object 0x20380b0 ( continuously for a while followed by a [Sep 1 20:36:46] WARNING[7761][C-0000770d]:

Has anyone here done any work on clustering Meetme conferences over multiple Asterisk boxes? The scenario I am thinking of is where there are two or more boxes connected to a set of PRIs that all answer to the same PSTN number, and where it's not possible to know in advance on which box a call would arrive. So it would be possible to have some calls on one box and some on another, that should

I've just noticed a strange behaviour with a MeetMe conference. I have a pair of phones (GS BT102) on my desk, and dialled both of them into a conference on speakerphone. If I spoke or made a sound, I heard it replayed from both speakers together a split second later, as expected. I went away for about 15 minutes, leaving the conference running. When I came back any sound I made came back

Dear group, Was wondering if anyone out there has had the experience I have been having. In reading recent posts on echo cancellation, I think there is.... We recently cut over the Asterisk and are configured with 5 FXS and 2 FXO ports to the PSTN via 2 TDM400P's and 5 SIP phones on our local network. I have set up echo cancellation with 800ms echo training. I do not have

Hi, I'm trying to diagnose a particularly elusive problem, and am wondering if anyone else here has seen anything similar and can offer any ideas. I have a conference bridge running Asterisk 1.2.32 (with slight mods), in a colo talking via a LAN to an ITSP using SIP/RTP. It is dedicated to a single customer. On several occasions over the last few months, the customer has reported instances

I'm in the process of specifying the hardware for some new Asterisk systems which will be running a substantial number of conferences with recording. I was wondering what there is to choose between SCSI, SAS and SATA disks, in terms of performance for this kind of application. I will be using dual drives with kernel-based software RAID1. Any advice from experience would be appreciated!

In article <mfbt6f$9rt$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that > is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is > performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 > system on a public IP. > > My question is

In article <n009u2$85v$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > Apologies, this is slightly off-topic being to do with an EPEL package, > although it's running on CentOS6, so I thought others here might have come > across this issue. > > I have five CentOS 6 systems running fail2ban from EPEL, and this > package was updated

In article <CAG2kNCyjsQZ2qW_8BBLp8BH_20=JgxoEYpn9BSwZhXg7_rHBbg at mail.gmail.com>, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> > wrote: > > > I am just applying the latest C6 updates to a couple of KVM Linodes. > > It appears that the latest update of util-linux-ng has

Has anyone else experienced a problem with the LED for span 1 on a TE410P or TE405P? I had a TE410P on which the span 1 LED would not light red, but once the span was connected, it did correctly light green. I RMAed the board to our UK distrbutor and received a replacement. However, the replacement board displayed the same problem! Wondering if it was related to the computer I was putting it

Ok, that sounds a little more elegant. Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop it from downloading at all? On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <CANZsmmM6C_F+NuPdjd+mGDEXaJVcfc1bdhpWdESSbC2CR7Dz3 > g at mail.gmail.com>, > Felipe Westfields <felipe.westfields at gmail.com>

@tonymountifield Does this still hold true? https://superuser.com/a/1075837 On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:21 AM Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, > Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis

In article <301a2e78-d490-3805-e30f-41b668aac5c1 at sysnux.pf>, Jean-Denis Girard <jd.girard at sysnux.pf> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > Le 20/07/2019 à 06:29, Tony Mountifield a écrit : > > Are there any other languages/libraries I should be considering? > > Same here, after years of AGI / AMI, I recently made my first project > using ARI on Asterisk-16. I love

In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to

Roberto estoy en uruguay en estoos momentos. Recien lllego el miercoles El mar 31, 2013 1:59 p.m., <asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com> escribi?: > Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to > asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

I am trying to debug a SIP issue, between an Asterisk 1.2.32 system that is behind a network device to which I don't have ready access, which is performing NAT with possibly some kind of SIP ALG, and an Asterisk 11 system on a public IP. My question is very specific, and I don't need right now to discuss the ins and outs of the above setup. What I am seeing is that when I have set up a

In article <ml1jnh$afr$1 at softins.softins.co.uk>, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.co.uk> wrote: > When I started using CentOS 6 instead of CentOS 5, I discovered that > "less" no longer understood \< and \>, which I had been used to using > since almost forever. > > Eventually research revealed that in the Fedora version on which > RHEL 6 was