similar to: 2 Asterisk servers (IAX) behind one firewall

Hi, It seems that the "switch" parameter has a priority in the dialplan that is higher than the wildcard extensions.. This I am finding to be a problem.. My setup.. UA1--[AST1]--{IAX}--[AST2]--UA2 | | PSTN1 PSTN2 I use switch on AST1 to connect to AST2... As you can see I have PSTN connections on both and also the IAX connection is not permanent.. I

Hi all. Ive recently setup two Asterisk boxes (running Asterisk@Home to be specific), and Im trying to get a trunk going between them. So far I have tried a combination of IAX and SIP configuring them through AMP and writing the config files manually, but I cant seem to get calls going between the two. I have named each box asterisk1 and asterisk2. Does anyone have some working SIP and/or IAX

Hi All, I've been observing a very odd behaviour of Asterisk, when relating to SIP connections. Here's the scenario: Ast1 is an Asterisk box originating calls via a predictive dialer Ast2 is an Asterisk box connected to 3E1 circuits Ast1 originates calls to Ast2 via SIP, in order to utilize the PSTN lines. (There is a reason I'm using SIP here, so please don't say:

Maybe someone has already suggested this, but if your functions accepted strings you could use sub or gsub to replace the -> with a symbol that parsed at the same precedence as <-, say <<-. Then parse it and deal with it. When it is time to display the parsed and perhaps manipulated formulae to the user, deparse it and do the reverse replacement. > encode <-

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, As I've been unable to get app_transfer to work, could someone explain how it is supposed to work? Currently I have two Asterisk boxes. A call comes in via zaptel to ast1. ast1 dials ast2 using iax2 and gets instructed to transfer the call to a different extension. iax2 debug shows that a transfer cmd is sent to ast1, but nothing happens

Dear All, I was trying to use Realtime Asterisk option for Sip users and peers + Heartbeat + Mysql Replication in order to make a failover system, so that if Ast1 went down for any reason, Ast2 server will have the same data that Ast1 used in the Mysql database and don't need to make the phones re-register. But when I started testing: the calls that where active during the transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, As I understand it, Asterisk currently uses the timestamps in incoming RTP packets to build outgoing voice frames. Is this true? Would it be possible for me to use i.e. zaprtc as a timing source for the outgoing stream? I.e. in a setup like below I'd like to use zaprtc timing on Ast1 because I don't trust the timestamps coming from

Hi Pan & Dhaval, In the past 8 weeks, we have delivered a load-balanced asterisks (1.4) based call center with our flexqueue application for icson.com. It has the below features, 1. 2 x asterisk 1.4 boxes, 1 x mysql db box and 1 x flexqueue box(the two are failover configured with heartbeat and custom script, and mysql master-slave replication between two svr), 2 x kamailio boxes(failover

[image: Post]<http://accessanywebsite.com/search.php?u=Oi8vd3d3LmVmbG8ubmV0L1ZJQ0lESUFMZm9ydW0vdmlld3RvcGljLnBocD9wPTI4NjU%3D&b=2#28652>Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject: DTMF and IVR ... Sorry but URGENT[image: Reply with quote]<http://accessanywebsite.com/search.php?u=Oi8vd3d3LmVmbG8ubmV0L1ZJQ0lESUFMZm9ydW0vcG9zdGluZy5waHA%2FbW9kZT1xdW90ZSZwPTI4NjUy&b=2>

Did any one know the CBWFQ implimentation in Linux Box.. Please comment on this those who knows ********* *Sunil* ********* _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Enhanced OS. General rules I use: -Do not use SIP transformations (the VOIP tab), these cause random RTP = issues, and once you start forwarding calls between users, all things go = to heck. You are better off using NAT/qualify in your sip.conf. -Do not use SonicOS Standard (all new Sonicwalls should come with = Enhanced now anyway) as there is no method to increase the timeout for = UDP rules,

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:19 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > > Am 04.03.19 um 21:18 schrieb Mark Foley via samba: > >> It shouldn't, you normally only have one gateway, it is by definition > >> the 'gateway' to the WAN & internet, so I would use the same one on all > >> your machines. > > > > The LAN host

There is a SonicWall Pro 2040 to which I successfully established a VPN tunnel under Windows XP using SonicWall VPN client. Now, I'm looking for a way to establish a VPN tunnel to the same SonicWall device under Linux. Installing the SonicWall VPN client under wine 0.9.27 failed ans as far as I understand a posting of 2006 it's doubtful if this type of software will ever be installable

Hello Has anyone else run into a problem with dovecot pop3 and sonicwall? A week after switching to dovecot we had two local customers call and report they could no longer download emails with attachments. It turned out to be the email macro filter on the router. After the first report I thought maybe the customer had just changed something or it was a fluke, but then a day later we had the

Hi all, I currently have an Asterisk test server behind a TZ170 Sonicwall firewall / NAT box, with several DIDs. I've found that inbound IAX2 calls don't work reliably (i.e., I get a busy tone) unless I enable "Use Consistent NAT" in the Sonicwall. This feature is poorly documented by Sonicwall, so I thought I'd pass it along. Has anyone else run into this, or figured

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 14:50:38 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > >

Dear Barry, In general, I believe users are already accustomed with the classical arrows "->" and "<-" which are used as such in quoted expressions. But I agree that "-.>" is a very neat trick, thanks a lot. A small dot, what a difference. All the best, Dmitri On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:40?AM Barry Rowlingson < b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:18:36 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:57:16 -0500 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 20:43:17 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >

I am running Samba 3.4.8 as a PDC on Solaris 10. I recently made this the WINS master- previously the BDC (Samba 3.0.37 on another Solaris 10 server.) I also use Sonicwall ipsec VPN for remote access (Windows XP clients.) The sonicwall client creates a virtual NIC on the client so that the client can have an IP address directly on the company LAN (ie. the same LAN as the samba

On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:18:31 -0500 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:31:07 +0000 From: Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:58:17 -0500 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:18:31 +0000 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > >