Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Asterisk + SIP + NAT - seriously, what's the secret?"
2008 Oct 16
2
SIP: difference between Grandstream and Cisco when behind NAT
I have used Grandstream phones for years, and have just started testing
a Cisco 7940 (with SIP firmware 7.4). I have found something puzzling
and don't know whether it's just a limitation or something I haven't
done correctly.
The Asterisk server is directly on the Internet with a public IP.
The phones are on a private LAN with a NAT router to the Internet.
The sip.conf entries for
2006 Nov 06
7
several behind NAT
I've got my asterisk server in the DMZ of my local LAN - I've used my
Budgetone and GXP2000's from the Internet- on direct IP connections
with no problems. However, I'm about to deploy about 5 phones
(either budgetone or GXP2000's) all on a LAN behind a NAT- on a
different network than the Asterisk server. Should I look into using
STUN servers? Will this setup be a
2004 Dec 14
1
Asterisk to sip client behind Firewall/NAT - cancall but cannot receive calls ?
Check your FW-1 tracker and see if any sip packets are dropped during
call initiation.
I had this problem and it went away when I upgraded the BT's firmware to
the latest (16).
Beware, though, that people on the list claim that this firmware breaks
functionality of the message button and autoanswer.
I haven't checked this yet, cause I can't afford to go back a version.
I prefer a
2005 Jan 27
3
SIP + NAT = horrible mess
Hi Guys,
After days of fiddling, I can't really get my SIP device to work
communicate with Asterisk behind NAT. Sometimes the STUN server is
flaky, sometimes the device isn't reachable if the connection is dropped
and then put back on, sometimes it registers OK, sometimes it doesn't, etc.
I've come to the same conclusion as the wiki: it's probably better to
avoid this
2004 Jan 14
3
grandstream asterisk configuration
hi,
I have the following configuration:
Grandstream --> NAT (Netgear RP614)-->Internet-->Asterisk(public IP)
i can register fine and call ringing is working as good. The problem is =
i cant hear audio both ways and i get this error:
WARNING[22544]: File rtp.c, Line 375 (ast_rtp_read): RTP Read error:
Resource temporarily unavailable
my sip.conf file is as follows:
2003 Oct 27
1
Asterisk + Sip phones on Nat
Hi,
I install * and is working fine. I have 3 FXO cards w/ 3 phone lines. All
the phones are SIP phones (Grandstream). The SIP phones from the same LAN w/
Asterisk are working but on the external phones (from the Internet) I don?t
have sound. All the Grandstream phones from the Internet are register from
different locations behind a NAT.
All the sip users are register on * but the main issue is
2004 May 23
1
Serious NAT problems: can't call between lines on sipura
I have a problem that is almost certainly nat-related, but I can't figure
out what's happening.
Since moving the Sipura behind a NAT server (Linksys), I am no longer able
to call between the two lines on the same Sipura. When I dial one
extension from the other, it rings, but immediately after I pick up the
ringing phone, the call is uncerimoniously dumped. I can tell the call
2004 Jan 10
5
Asterisk + BudgeTone (behind NAT)
I'm using Asterisk on a open server (no firewall or NAT) and trying to
communicate with a Grandstream BudgeTone 102 SIP phone which is behind
NAT. The BudgeTone is at firmware level 1.0.4.30 and Asterisk is from CVS
about a week ago. My problem is that I'm only getting half-duplex
communication -- I can hear voice from the Asterisk server but the server
does not understand any voice from
2009 Oct 10
1
Grandstream GXP 2010 : multiple accounts not working
On my Grandstream GXP 2010 I have the possibility for 6 channels and
thus 6 different accounts...
Line 1 I define an account that registers directly to an online
Asterisk-server, somewhere in a datacentre.
Line 2 I define an account that registers to the local Asterisk-server
(NSLU2 unslung)
When I activate both accounts, only the first account (to the
Asterisk-server on the internet) registers.
2004 May 28
1
Immortal SIP & NAT problem
Hi guies,
I know I know this subject have been The most written subject about VoIP
Right... but I just want to make clear, just one time !
If Asterisk is on a Public IP Address and a softphone behind the nat,
sip.conf must contains for this phone: nat=yes ....
Now if I want to configure my sipphone (X-Lite) placing behing the NAT,
it must have in "Domain/Realm" the external IP
2006 May 03
2
SIP Phones behind dynamic IPs
Greetings list,
I'm coming across an issue with some of the GXP-2000 phones we have out in
the wild at clients' employees' homes. In most cases they're behind consumer
ADSL NAT routers on a dynamic IP from their ISP.
In a nutshell, the phone is unable to be called unless it's restarted first,
after which it's fine for a good few hours, then it stops working until
2004 Jun 18
1
Grandstream HT-286 and NAT
I have 2 Grandstream HT-286 devices and an Asterisk server. The *
Server is not using NAT and has port 5060 opened up. One HT-286 is
using traditional NAT and the other HT-286 is behind a residential DSL
router/firewall. I have the HT-286 setup as the "DMZ Host" in the
router/firewall so that all incoming connections are forwarded to the
HT-286.
HT-286-1 ====== NAT FW ====== * Server
2005 Jun 28
4
How do you handle NAT?
We are interested in how other people are handling NAT problems. We have
several customers all of which have some sort of firewall/NAT device at
their location. For simplicity sake, all customers' internal networks
are 192.168.*.*.
Our asterisk box is on public IP not blocked by any FW/NAT.
I use QUALIFY=yes on all our customers' phones and I feel that sending
out 80-something
2009 Jan 29
2
Don't get asterisk to run behind NAT router
Hi people!
I am not getting smart getting asterisk 1.6 behind a NAT to run.
1. I enabled IP forwarding on debian linux
2. told asterisk in "general" that he is behind NAT and mentioned him
his external static IP Adress as well his domain in the outside world.
If a client who is connected with a DSL modem calls me, a grandstream
module in the LAN behind the router, in the same network
2005 Sep 13
2
Nat & Sip & Pain
Hi everyone,
I decided to have a look at SIP & NAT again and I've been at it for a
[quite a] few hours but typically nothing is working for me. Actually
I'm not sure if SIP and NAT can ever work but some emails on this list
do suggest that someone has got it working, once, maybe.
I'm experimenting with a ZyXEL 2000W [WiFi Sip phone] which supports
"Outbound Proxy",
2004 May 22
1
Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY requests)
At 7:36 PM +0200 on 5/22/04, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>>[snip]
>Sending NOTIFY to Asterisk is an error, but a workaround. Since Asterisk
>can handled the NAT traversal all by itself with Qualify (as John points
>out) disabling the NOTIFY will not change anything.
>
>The NOTIFY will in no way affect the status - unreachable/reachable.
>
>Another problem with the SIPURA is
2010 Oct 15
3
SIP - no audio behind nat problem
Hello,
We have 2 grandstream GX 2000 phones behind NAT and Asterisk outside this
natted network.
We have the issue with calls to these SIP phones - no audio.
It is probably the problem with port forwarding on router - but I am not
sure how can I forward same sip ports (5004 to 5100) to two phones (nat
addresses?)?
Any help appreciated!
Z. Zivanovic
-------------- next part
2004 May 22
1
Re: Sipura and STUN (was: rejected NOTIFY re quests)
Sipura does include STUN as an option. It has for quite some time. We are
using it with all of our Sipuras behind NAT'd gateways and it works great!
Try upgrading to the latest Sipura firmware rev.
Darren Nay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Todd [mailto:jtodd@loligo.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 1:57 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject:
2006 Nov 02
1
is IAX required for firewall and router?
I'm trying to understand IAX and whether or not it would solve my
difficulties:
'The primary goals for IAX were to minimize bandwidth used in media
transmissions, with particular attention drawn to control and individual
voice calls, and to provide native support for NAT (Network Address
Translation) transparency. Another goal is to be easy to use behind
firewalls.'
2004 Apr 18
2
grandstream and stun
Hi,
I noticed some issues with how grandstream handles
stun test. GS is running version 1.0.4.50. First I
reset the NAT router. Then reboot GS, get results of
"restricted cone". Immediately reboot GS, get results
"full cone". I tried quite a few public and commercial
stun servers. Also tried different model/version of
linksys routers. I always got the same issue. Winstun
on