similar to: Strange text on Asterisk console

Ever since upgrading to 1.2.8 I've been getting occasional WARNINGS that say: WARNING[4356]: rtp.c:500 ast_rtp_read: Forcing Marker bit, because SSRC has changed. Is there something I need to fix or is this a benign message? Ira -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.0/352 - Release Date: 5/30/2006

I am trying to get * to write CDR records to an MS SQL table. I am used the freeTDS set up (not using UNIX ODBC), and it appears to be making the connection to the database, but I make a call, I get this error: WARNING[3369]: cdr_tds.c:180 tds_log: Reconnected to SQL database. ERROR[3369]: cdr_tds.c:191 tds_log: Failed to insert Call Data Records into SQL database. I've assigned all rights

This is frustrating. Asterisk has crashed now twice today and neither crash has produced a core file. My ulimit is unlimited. I'm using safe_asterisk so asterisk is restarting immediatly, but how the hell am I suposed to find out wtf happened with no core file? Debug log doesn't say anything either. AGRHHHHHHHH -Matthew --

I've asterisk stop (presumably segfaulting) a couple of times, and I was just beginning to look at how to keep it running - what have others done? I was thinking of wrapping a script around asterisk like this: while 1 do asterisk -f done /Per Jessen, Z?rich -- http://www.spamchek.com/ - your spam is our business.

Hello, I've found a couple of previous posts on this subject, but with no posted resolution... I'm attempting to run * as a non-root user (asterisk), following the guidelines on the wiki: http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20non-root I can run * as my new user with "/usr/sbin/asterisk -vvvvc" without problem. However, I'm unable to run * using

I'm trying to compile channels/h323 and chan_h323 from CVS-STABLE, on Fedora Core 3. Firstly, despite the warnings in h323/README, I decided to try using the distro-specific versions of openh323 and pwlib. Of course, the Makefiles in channels and channels/h323 assume that openh323 and pwlib have been specially compiled in $HOME, so I modified the Makefiles to look for headers and libraries in

Dear All I installed a Digium card TE405P with zaptel and its running successfully with no alarms, but asterisk is not running . Any one have a cure or advice 03:09.0 Communication controller: Digium, Inc. Wildcard TE405P quad-span T1/E1/J1 card 5.0V (rev 02) Nov 14 07:56:58 localhost kernel: wct4xxp: Clearing yellow alarm on span 2 Nov 14 07:56:58 localhost kernel: wct4xxp: Clearing

Hi Guys, Just did an Asterisk 1.6.x (repo install) and FreePBX (source install). When trying to dial a number, I get this: tel*CLI> Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /var/www/html/panel/ op_server.pl line 3367. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /var/www/html/panel/op_server.pl line 3372. Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at

In article <E02FA554-9D6D-4E7D-8A78-5FBDE1DE939D at kicp.uchicago.edu>, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > > > On Sep 26, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have a disk that is flagging errors, attempting to rescue the data. > > > > I tried dd first - if gets about 117G of 320G disk

In article <20151125133008.6369360.14455.17239 at gmail.com>, Israel Gottlieb <isrlgb at gmail.com> wrote: > Try putting progress instead of answer Yes, I tried Progress already, and it didn't help. But thanks for the suggestion! Tony > I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. > > I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to

has anyone done caller announce in MeetMe's before? Dave P >>> brian@bkw.org 5/18/2004 5:50:49 PM >>> With multiple parking lots you can give each person their own lot thus exten 800 for everyone will connect them with just their call passing the lot name which you know for X customer. bkw ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Kohlsmith"

Hello List, I have seen from the following link that, for SIP channels there is no audio communication possible in MeetMe with AGI_BACKGROUND. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+MeetMe Currently we are using asterisk-1.6.2 and the problem still persists. Is there any solution available to overcome this problem? According to our requirement, we have to run an AGI script in MeetMe.

I have been writing a lot of AGI programs in C with good success. I would like somehow to have an AGI program continue in the background while the pbx execution returns to the dialplan and continues. Is this possible? I was thinking that perhaps I could fork or create another thread within the AGI prog. The reason I want to do so is in order to monitor external information (e.g. credit limit and

I am having problems getting the latest CVS right now. A cvs checkout asterisk -t gets to this part and sits forever: S-> server_register(fpm-world-mix.mp3, 1.1, , , , , ) S-> Register(fpm-world-mix.mp3, 1.1, , , ) Anyone know how I can just skip the file? Travis Conway EFS, Inc. Information Technology Desk:?? (334) 215-6551 Mobile: (334) 391-4450 mailto:travis@homeoffice.quikpawn.com

I've noticed that with FastAGI (and maybe AGI) that when you sequentially send a sequence of dial commands, if the call is picked up, that after the call ends, the Fast AGI script keeps executing the commands! Is there anyway to stop execution once a call is picked up? I think looking at the result codes after the Dial to determine if the call was picked up or not is not a good idea... if it

I have a puzzling situation, and would be grateful for any insight. I have a dialplan that forwards an incoming call out to another number via the same SIP trunk as it came in on. e.g. [from-siptrunk] exten => 0123456789,1,NoOp exten => 0123456789,n,Dial(SIP/siptrunk/0987654321) Now, if I use a different SIP trunk for the outbound call, than the inbound call came on, the call is set up

Does anyone know how a program, script or shell user can best determine whether the machine is running on bare metal or is a VMware guest? Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org

Thanks for the feedback. I do agree with having multiple smaller servers. When I was first approached with this task I mentioned as much. However, the current desire is to work with already existing hardware. That is out of my hands at the moment unless it just can't be done. I will explore Freeswitch a bit soon to compare it as well. I am struggling to find what the bottle neck is in

I have a small number of boxes in different locations, and currently have a fairly crude cron job running on each, which does a ping of one or more of the other boxes, and if the ping fails, it emails me to say the other box might be down. It then emails me again the next time the other box appears to be up. Of course, this can't distinguish between the remote box really being down and there