similar to: Queue Auto fallthrough

Guys.. this is killing me.. I hava a laptop running sjphone and I have 2 dial cmds to connect to that laptop in different places, first, on the main phones context like this: exten => 202,1,Dial(SIP/laptop,20,m) so each phone can call it, and it works great. Now, I have anyother cmd on a different context, which is the IVR, like this: exten =>

Guys. Anybody knows why this is happening? Seems every time I make an internal call, the manager shows this and I don't get the callerid on my identapop but rather the calledid.. Event: Dial Privilege: call,all Source: SIP/intruder1-85f0 Destination: SIP/test-f037 CallerID: 201 CallerIDName: Anton Krall SrcUniqueID: 1117038116.7 DestUniqueID: 1117038116.8 Event: Newchannel Privilege:

I just installed tapi and some app called identapop pro. I havent tested incoming calls yet but so far, I cant get calls out using outlooks. I configured TAPI for asterisk inside outlooks and I set TAPI to these configs: TAPI connects using the manager to asterisk without problems. As channels I configure this: User channel: SIP/myphone and the phone actually rings when I tell outlook to dial

Hi, I'm following the Kaleidoscope tutorial (which is very good btw) and am having difficulties having function calls for functions that haven't been defined getting resolved to plain C++ functions. In the tutorial (end of chapter 4), executing "extern putchard(x); putchard(120);" should execute the corresponding C++ function defined in the same file. Unfortunately in my case it

mriou wrote: > Using the sin(x) and cos(x) functions work though, only the ones included in > the main file don't. So I'm a bit puzzled... Did you link your executable with -rdynamic? -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr.Graef at t-online.de, ag at muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de WWW:

Hello there, drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/dma/usernv04.c:124:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Source code is switch (dmaobj->base.access) { case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00004000; break; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_WO: dmaobj->flags0 |= 0x00008000; case NV_MEM_ACCESS_RW: dmaobj->flags2

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:06:39PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > fallthrough to a separate case/default label break; isn't very readable. > > Convert pseudo-keyword fallthrough; statements to a simple break; when > the next label is case or default and the only statement in the next > label block is break; > > Found using: > > $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n

On 2020-09-09 21:06, Joe Perches wrote: > fallthrough to a separate case/default label break; isn't very readable. > > Convert pseudo-keyword fallthrough; statements to a simple break; when > the next label is case or default and the only statement in the next > label block is break; > > Found using: > > $ grep-2.5.4 -rP --include=*.[ch] -n

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:06:39PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c > index eea0f453cfb6..8aac5bc60f4c 100644 > --- a/crypto/tcrypt.c > +++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c > @@ -2464,7 +2464,7 @@ static int do_test(const char *alg, u32 type, u32 mask, int m, u32 num_mb) > test_hash_speed("streebog512", sec, >

If I compile libFLAC with GCC 7.1 I see many warnings like lpc.c: In function 'FLAC__lpc_compute_residual_from_qlp_coefficients': lpc.c:489:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] case 32: sum += qlp_coeff[31] * data[i-32]; ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lpc.c:490:5: note: here case 31: sum += qlp_coeff[30] * data[i-31];

Hey, For the bridge issue, take a look at 'notransfer=yes' option in your iax.conf. It'll force * to stay in the path http://www.mail-archive.com/asterisk-users@lists.digium.com/msg42262.html

Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > Hello, > >> ready> ERROR: Program used external function 'putchard' which could not >> be >> resolved! >> Any idea of what could be wrong? > Please make sure you're using C linkage for such functions, due to > mangling the name of > function being emitted is not "putchard". Something like this: >

The current code simply calls "start_kernel" directly if we're under a hypervisor and no paravirt_ops backend wants us, because paravirt.c registers that as a backend. This was always a vain hope; start_kernel won't get far without setup. It's also impossible for paravirt_ops backends which don't sit in the arch/i386/kernel directory: they can't link before

The current code simply calls "start_kernel" directly if we're under a hypervisor and no paravirt_ops backend wants us, because paravirt.c registers that as a backend. This was always a vain hope; start_kernel won't get far without setup. It's also impossible for paravirt_ops backends which don't sit in the arch/i386/kernel directory: they can't link before

I am a serious Asterisk newbie: just installed asterisk last week and it is now running with our Voicetronix OpenLine4 hardware. All is working as expected with one exception, in the following sequence (extracted from my extensions.conf file): [GetConfirmation] exten => s,n,SetVar(TimeOut=0) ; if timeout and TimeOut=1 then user already timed out once, so hangup exten =>

Hello, > ready> ERROR: Program used external function 'putchard' which could not be > resolved! > Any idea of what could be wrong? Please make sure you're using C linkage for such functions, due to mangling the name of function being emitted is not "putchard". Something like this: extern "C" void putchard(char c) { ... } Or, just provide a mapping

I upgraded from 1.0.9 to 1.2.1 My IVR which worked perfectly on 1.0.9, now hangup with no reason (at least I could not find a cause) When this hangup happen, I can read: == Auto fallthrough, channel 'IAX/user-20' status is 'BUSY' This happening also with ZAP channels I'm really disappointed with 1.2.1, what is benefit from upgrade if I must spend couple days to get my system

Hi all, I'm trying to sort out my dial plan. What I'm wanting is something like the following - a bit simplified but hopefully you'll get the idea. 1) match internal extensions: dial them 2) anything else: send out zap 1 is easy :) it's 2 that's giving me problems. I had hoped that the 'i' extension would act as a catchall extension but it seems to only do that from

Great! Thanks everyone for the input, I'm going to start splitting up the patch. I'll send out the non-mechanical parts separately. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:03 PM Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Oct 31, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Alex Kornienko proposed enabling this warning back in 2012 here: >

Hi. I upgraded my main build host and the clang -Werror builds started failing. This is because clang 10's -Wimplicit-fallthrough doesn't understand /* FALLTHROUGH */ but rather requires __attribute__((fallthrough)): clang -Wall -O2 [...] -Wimplicit-fallthrough [...] -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c /openbsd-compat/base64.c