similar to: Transfer a call ? Am I looking for the flash command ?

Hey.. Your saying I can not use flash with ISDN ? What options to I have to transfer a call directly ? ( So I have a free line afterwords) >> What interface are you using? ZapBRI? if so you might be able to do the >> hairpinning if it is supported. Im not using any interface.. But if you know how to do that, let me know and I install that interface. Thx for your answer :) Gr?sse

I have Asterisk setup in a SOHO environment. I have 2 X100P cards at Zap/1 and Zap/2. I have 1 TDM400P card with Zap/3 - Zap/5. I have subscribed to callwaiting, callerid and calleridcallwaiting from Qwest on the 2 PSTN lines - Zap/1 and Zap/2. My problem is when I'm in an active call to the outside thru Zap/1 or Zap/2, I can't pickup the incoming callwaiting call. I can see the

Hello! I have 2 table: users and buddies User: id, name, ... Buddy: id, user_id, user_buddy_id, ... So if you have 2 users 1,jack and 2,fred and fred is a buddy of jack, there is a Buddy object: id=1, user_id=1, user_buddy_id=2 I can declare only one belongs_to in Buddy and one has_many in User. And there is conflict if I had the second one (the first one is discarded) class User has_many

Finally got everything up and run with the help of Manny Wise last night. So I am setting up my digital assistant and getting down to the task I need this box to perform the most. I need to have a custom app that I can call that will take me pressing 2 at the menu and have it transfer the call to a offsite phone number utilizing my Zap Trunk. I'm sure someone has done this already. Anyone want

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > ... > >>>>> > >>>>>

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:20:50AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/05/2016 03:54 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > >> On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > ... > >>>>> > >>>>>

There seems to be some hostility to the idea of this being a GNOME or Evolution problem: Bug 542280 ? Refuses to report bugs because gnome 2.16.x is too old View Bug Activity Product: bug-buddy Component: general Version: 2.16.x Status: RESOLVED Resolution: WONTFIX Opened by Mark Hull-Richter (reporter, points: 3) 2008-07-09 23:40 UTC [reply] On CentOS 5.2 (and 5.1 and 5.0, and Red Hat

On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place > > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.

On Fri 18-10-19 14:35:06, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 18.10.19 13:20, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 18-10-19 10:50:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 18.10.19 10:15, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > > > > for that - MEM_GOING_OFFLINE notification. This sounds like a good place > > > > for the driver to decide whether it is safe to let the page go or not.

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: ... > >>> > >>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding > >>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which > >>> pin we are

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:46:31PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 04/04/2016 06:45 AM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:39:17AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: ... > >>> > >>> Also (but not your fault) the put_page() preceding > >>> test_set_page_hwpoison(page)) IMHO deserves a comment saying which > >>> pin we are

Hi Team! Just having a bit of trouble with the many-to-many relationship of the same type. Im trying to build a buddy list. So I have a users table and want to allow each user to have a buddlist of users. Ive tried having a User model and a Buddy model where the buddy model has 2 fields user_id and a buddy_id but i cant get the buddy.name methods to resolve when getting a list of buddies.

A follow up (late better than never) Finally had time to sit down and look at this sip.cfg <keys key.scrolling.timeout="1" key.IP_500.31.function.prim="BuddyStatus"/> This turns the Services key which I never use on a 501 into the Buddy Status. It even works while on a call. One touch! Bill ________________________________ From: Bill Gibbs

On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > > > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > > > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that

On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts > > > were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely > > > unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that

On 10/26/20 11:09 AM, Gregory Heytings wrote: >>> I too would strongly advise you to use Google Workspace (the recent >>> new name for G Suite, previously known as Google Apps).? It's cheap, >>> very reliable, and has all features you can dream of, including an >>> autoresponder.? It's unrealistic to think that it's possible to beat >>>

I've included my jabber.conf below. I'm betting the following errors: [Jul 18 21:05:22] ERROR[28166]: res_jabber.c:609 aji_act_hook: JABBER: Node Error [Jul 18 21:05:22] WARNING[28166]: res_jabber.c:1537 aji_recv_loop: JABBER: Got hook event. jabber test [Jul 18 21:04:16] WARNING[32691]: res_jabber.c:1421 ast_aji_send: JABBER: Not connected can't send User: bferrell at gtalk.com

I'm thinking about using asterisk as an IVR system with an existing avaya index system. I've got 2x PRI 30 lines coming in to the Index, and I have 4 spare PRI cards in the Index. I was thinking about using a QUAD PRI card from Digium and having the calls come into the Index then transfer to Asterisk for IVR then back to the Index. That way if we get 60 inbound calls we'd in

>> >> >> Hi All, >> >> After getting licences for Skype for asterisk a while ago I finally got >> around to setting up a server with two channels and setting up a bcp on >> the skype end. >> >> The idea behind this is the following: >> >> Users can dial into the PBX, get authenticated and only after> >>

After having looked around on google, voip-info, etc, I am coming here for a bit of insight from anyone who might be willing to provide some.... I am using * (it's A@H, but this should apply to any * install) to handle my home phone line. I have a TDM11B card, and my Verizon line comes in on the FXO port and my cordless phone is plugged in to the FXS port. Everything works just