Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Asterisk and Fedora Core 3"
2005 Feb 24
2
Asterisk and Welltech USB SIP phone K1000A
Hi all
I'm fairly new to Asterisk, so be nice :-)
I was wondering if anyone has been able to get the Welltech K1000A USB
phone working on Linux. I see audio and HID drivers loaded when it is
plugged in to my Fedora Core 1 laptop, but that's about all that
happens. I've searched all the usual places (FAQ, Google, etc) but not
found anything helpful.
Asterisk is working fine with
2007 Jun 30
1
Asterisk 1.4.6 Fedora 7 configure error
Hi guys
I'm at a loss in getting ./configure to complete successfully with asterisk 1.4.6 on
Fedora 7 x86_64, as it complains about no termcap support, even though it is installed
(see below).
Any ideas where to go next?
checking for ZT_DIAL_OP_CANCEL in zaptel/zaptel.h... no
configure: error: *** termcap support not found
[root at mail3 asterisk-1.4.6]# rpm -qv termcap
2006 Jan 20
1
SIP phone receiving but not transmitting
Hi
I've been using Asterisk for a while now with the TDM400 and it seems to
be working fine. I'm using version 1.2.2 and I've struck a problem when
I added a Budge Tone 100 SIP phone to the network. The phone rings when
calls come in and I can make calls but in all cases (internal or
external calls) the other party cannot hear me even though I can hear them.
I'm sure I've
2019 Oct 26
2
Centos 8 Mate?
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:08:02PM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote:
> On 26/10/2019 12:08 pm, David G. Miller wrote:
> >The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
> >work.? Not the best solution but a solution.
> >
>
> But no longer available that I can find. I presume it must be
> version 1.5.11-13 to match the -lib version
On my C8 VM I uust
2013 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
I've applied this and the test cases I have here continue to work, so it
looks good to me.
I've ran into another (seemingly unrelated) issue which I'll describe in
a separate email to the dev list.
--
Peter N
On 20/07/2013 5:30 AM, Craig Topper wrote:
> Here's my attempt at a fix. Adding Jakob to make sure I did this right.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:34 AM,
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Here's my attempt at a fix. Adding Jakob to make sure I did this right.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote:
> That does appear to have worked. All my tests are passing now.
>
> I'll hand this out to our other devs & testers and make sure it's working
> for them as well (not just on my machine).
>
> Thank you,
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
That does appear to have worked. All my tests are passing now.
I'll hand this out to our other devs & testers and make sure it's
working for them as well (not just on my machine).
Thank you, again.
--
Peter N
On 19/07/2013 5:45 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
> I don't think that's going to work.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Peter Newman <peter at
2007 Jan 23
1
How to generate 'minor' ticks in lattice (qqmath)
Dear group,
I tried to generate labels for every second tick in lattice (qqmath).
Version: 0.14-16
Date: 2006/12/01
R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18)
An example:
library(lattice)
numy=100
y=runif(numy,min=0,max=1)
sig=0.05
numsig=length(which(y<sig))
tck.no=11 # number of ticks
tcks=1:tck.no
labl=as.character(0.1*tcks-0.1) # label for all ticks
labl[seq(2,tck.no-1,2)]="" # delete
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
I don't think that's going to work.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote:
> Thank you, I'm trying this now.
>
>
> On 19/07/2013 5:23 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>
> Try adding ECX to the Defs of this part of
> lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td like I've done below. I don't have a
> Windows machine to test
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Thank you, I'm trying this now.
On 19/07/2013 5:23 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
> Try adding ECX to the Defs of this part of
> lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td like I've done below. I don't have
> a Windows machine to test myself.
>
> let Defs = [EAX, EDX, ECX, EFLAGS], FPForm = SpecialFP in {
> def WIN_FTOL_32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins RFP32:$src),
>
2013 Jul 19
3
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Try adding ECX to the Defs of this part of
lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td like I've done below. I don't have a
Windows machine to test myself.
let Defs = [EAX, EDX, ECX, EFLAGS], FPForm = SpecialFP in {
def WIN_FTOL_32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins RFP32:$src),
"# win32 fptoui",
[(X86WinFTOL RFP32:$src)]>,
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Oh, excellent point, I agree. My bad. Now that I'm not assuming those
are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there are three
fptoui's and there are 3 call instances.
(Changing subject line again.)
Now it looks like it's bug #13862
On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
> I think those calls correspond to this
>
> %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
Hmm, maybe sse isn't being enabled so its falling back to emulating sqrt?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote:
> In the disassembly, I'm seeing three cases of
> call 76719BA1
>
> I am assuming this is the sqrt function as this is the only function
> called in the LLVM IR.
>
> The code at 76719BA1 is:
>
>
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
Is there something specifically required to enable SSE? If it's not
detected as available (based from the target triple?) then I don't think
we enable it specifically.
Also it seems that it should handle converting to/from the vector types,
although I can see it getting confused about needing to do that if it
thinks SSE isn't available at all.
On 19/07/2013 3:47 PM, Craig Topper
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
That should map directly to sqrtpd which can't modify ecx.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote:
> Sorry, that should have been llvm.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd
>
>
> On 19/07/2013 3:25 PM, Craig Topper wrote:
>
> What is "frep.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd". I'm only familiar with things prefixed
> with "llvm.x86".
>
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
In the disassembly, I'm seeing three cases of
call 76719BA1
I am assuming this is the sqrt function as this is the only function
called in the LLVM IR.
The code at 76719BA1 is:
76719BA1 push ebp
76719BA2 mov ebp,esp
76719BA4 sub esp,20h
76719BA7 and esp,0FFFFFFF0h
76719BAA fld st(0)
76719BAC fst dword ptr [esp+18h]
76719BB0 fistp
2019 May 28
1
multilib problem during "yum update"
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 14:05 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote:
> > ---> Package libgpg-error.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be an
> > update
> > ---> Package libgpg-error-debuginfo.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will
> > be an update
> > ---> Package libgpg-error-devel.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be
> > an update
>
> The update for libgpg-error.i686
2019 Oct 26
2
Centos 8 Mate?
The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to
work.? Not the best solution but a solution.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/25/19 5:33 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:17:53 +1100
> Bill Maidment wrote:
>
>> I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printer
>> configuration in MATE.
> I think it's missing. On Centos 7
2019 Dec 23
3
Using Pulse Audio--question
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:34:32AM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote:
> On 23/12/2019 11:06 am, Fred Smith wrote:
>
> >I can find no way to do it with pavucontrol, nor the default mate
> >sound tool.
>
> In my SL7 Mate system I use the Hardware and Output tabs in
> System->Preferences->Hardware->Sound
>
> Cheers
> Bill
Thanks bill.
But nothing I do there
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
What is "frep.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd". I'm only familiar with things prefixed
with "llvm.x86".
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote:
> After stepping through the produced assembly, I believe I have a culprit.
>
> One of the calls to @frep.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd is modifying the value of ECX -
> while the produced code is