similar to: Asterisk and Fedora Core 3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Asterisk and Fedora Core 3"

2005 Feb 24
2
Asterisk and Welltech USB SIP phone K1000A
Hi all I'm fairly new to Asterisk, so be nice :-) I was wondering if anyone has been able to get the Welltech K1000A USB phone working on Linux. I see audio and HID drivers loaded when it is plugged in to my Fedora Core 1 laptop, but that's about all that happens. I've searched all the usual places (FAQ, Google, etc) but not found anything helpful. Asterisk is working fine with
2007 Jun 30
1
Asterisk 1.4.6 Fedora 7 configure error
Hi guys I'm at a loss in getting ./configure to complete successfully with asterisk 1.4.6 on Fedora 7 x86_64, as it complains about no termcap support, even though it is installed (see below). Any ideas where to go next? checking for ZT_DIAL_OP_CANCEL in zaptel/zaptel.h... no configure: error: *** termcap support not found [root at mail3 asterisk-1.4.6]# rpm -qv termcap
2006 Jan 20
1
SIP phone receiving but not transmitting
Hi I've been using Asterisk for a while now with the TDM400 and it seems to be working fine. I'm using version 1.2.2 and I've struck a problem when I added a Budge Tone 100 SIP phone to the network. The phone rings when calls come in and I can make calls but in all cases (internal or external calls) the other party cannot hear me even though I can hear them. I'm sure I've
2019 Oct 26
2
Centos 8 Mate?
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:08:02PM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote: > On 26/10/2019 12:08 pm, David G. Miller wrote: > >The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to > >work.? Not the best solution but a solution. > > > > But no longer available that I can find. I presume it must be > version 1.5.11-13 to match the -lib version On my C8 VM I uust
2013 Jul 20
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
I've applied this and the test cases I have here continue to work, so it looks good to me. I've ran into another (seemingly unrelated) issue which I'll describe in a separate email to the dev list. -- Peter N On 20/07/2013 5:30 AM, Craig Topper wrote: > Here's my attempt at a fix. Adding Jakob to make sure I did this right. > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:34 AM,
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Here's my attempt at a fix. Adding Jakob to make sure I did this right. On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > That does appear to have worked. All my tests are passing now. > > I'll hand this out to our other devs & testers and make sure it's working > for them as well (not just on my machine). > > Thank you,
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
That does appear to have worked. All my tests are passing now. I'll hand this out to our other devs & testers and make sure it's working for them as well (not just on my machine). Thank you, again. -- Peter N On 19/07/2013 5:45 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > I don't think that's going to work. > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Peter Newman <peter at
2007 Jan 23
1
How to generate 'minor' ticks in lattice (qqmath)
Dear group, I tried to generate labels for every second tick in lattice (qqmath). Version: 0.14-16 Date: 2006/12/01 R version 2.4.1 (2006-12-18) An example: library(lattice) numy=100 y=runif(numy,min=0,max=1) sig=0.05 numsig=length(which(y<sig)) tck.no=11 # number of ticks tcks=1:tck.no labl=as.character(0.1*tcks-0.1) # label for all ticks labl[seq(2,tck.no-1,2)]="" # delete
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
I don't think that's going to work. On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > Thank you, I'm trying this now. > > > On 19/07/2013 5:23 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > > Try adding ECX to the Defs of this part of > lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td like I've done below. I don't have a > Windows machine to test
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Thank you, I'm trying this now. On 19/07/2013 5:23 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > Try adding ECX to the Defs of this part of > lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td like I've done below. I don't have > a Windows machine to test myself. > > let Defs = [EAX, EDX, ECX, EFLAGS], FPForm = SpecialFP in { > def WIN_FTOL_32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins RFP32:$src), >
2013 Jul 19
3
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Try adding ECX to the Defs of this part of lib/Target/X86/X86InstrCompiler.td like I've done below. I don't have a Windows machine to test myself. let Defs = [EAX, EDX, ECX, EFLAGS], FPForm = SpecialFP in { def WIN_FTOL_32 : I<0, Pseudo, (outs), (ins RFP32:$src), "# win32 fptoui", [(X86WinFTOL RFP32:$src)]>,
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] fptoui calling a function that modifies ECX
Oh, excellent point, I agree. My bad. Now that I'm not assuming those are the sqrt, I see the sqrtpd's in the output. Also there are three fptoui's and there are 3 call instances. (Changing subject line again.) Now it looks like it's bug #13862 On 19/07/2013 4:51 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > I think those calls correspond to this > > %110 = fptoui double %109 to i32
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
Hmm, maybe sse isn't being enabled so its falling back to emulating sqrt? On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > In the disassembly, I'm seeing three cases of > call 76719BA1 > > I am assuming this is the sqrt function as this is the only function > called in the LLVM IR. > > The code at 76719BA1 is: > >
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
Is there something specifically required to enable SSE? If it's not detected as available (based from the target triple?) then I don't think we enable it specifically. Also it seems that it should handle converting to/from the vector types, although I can see it getting confused about needing to do that if it thinks SSE isn't available at all. On 19/07/2013 3:47 PM, Craig Topper
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
That should map directly to sqrtpd which can't modify ecx. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > Sorry, that should have been llvm.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd > > > On 19/07/2013 3:25 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > > What is "frep.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd". I'm only familiar with things prefixed > with "llvm.x86". >
2013 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
In the disassembly, I'm seeing three cases of call 76719BA1 I am assuming this is the sqrt function as this is the only function called in the LLVM IR. The code at 76719BA1 is: 76719BA1 push ebp 76719BA2 mov ebp,esp 76719BA4 sub esp,20h 76719BA7 and esp,0FFFFFFF0h 76719BAA fld st(0) 76719BAC fst dword ptr [esp+18h] 76719BB0 fistp
2019 May 28
1
multilib problem during "yum update"
On Mon, 2019-05-27 at 14:05 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: > > ---> Package libgpg-error.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be an > > update > > ---> Package libgpg-error-debuginfo.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will > > be an update > > ---> Package libgpg-error-devel.x86_64 0:1.13-1.el7.centos will be > > an update > > The update for libgpg-error.i686
2019 Oct 26
2
Centos 8 Mate?
The corresponding system-config-printer rpm from Fedora 28 appears to work.? Not the best solution but a solution. Cheers, Dave On 10/25/19 5:33 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:17:53 +1100 > Bill Maidment wrote: > >> I have also got MATE 1.22.2 running, but I don't have access to Printer >> configuration in MATE. > I think it's missing. On Centos 7
2019 Dec 23
3
Using Pulse Audio--question
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:34:32AM +1100, Bill Maidment wrote: > On 23/12/2019 11:06 am, Fred Smith wrote: > > >I can find no way to do it with pavucontrol, nor the default mate > >sound tool. > > In my SL7 Mate system I use the Hardware and Output tabs in > System->Preferences->Hardware->Sound > > Cheers > Bill Thanks bill. But nothing I do there
2013 Jul 19
2
[LLVMdev] SIMD instructions and memory alignment on X86
What is "frep.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd". I'm only familiar with things prefixed with "llvm.x86". On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Peter Newman <peter at uformia.com> wrote: > After stepping through the produced assembly, I believe I have a culprit. > > One of the calls to @frep.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd is modifying the value of ECX - > while the produced code is