similar to: Hello~centos can support this?!

Dear Soeren, a couple of months ago, namely > revision 1.8 > date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +17 -2 > I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD > project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for > testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and > adds support for several of their new

Hi all! According to www.freebsd.org/releases/5.1R/hardware-i386.html#AEN63 FreeBSD doesnt seem to support the PDC20378 chipset. Anyway, output of dmesg, atapci0: <Promise PDC20378 SATA150 controller> port 0xdc00-0xdc7f,0xdfa0-0xdfaf,0xdf00-0xdf3f mem 0xfeac0000-0xfeadffff,0xfeafe000-0xfeafefff irq 11 at device 4.0 on pci2 more dmesg output: ar0: ERROR - array broken

I'm trying to move my drives from the slow built-in IDE controller to a faster PCI card (Promise ULTRA TX2). The boot loader succesfully loads the kernel, and the kernel succesfully probes the Promise controller and the hard disk connected to it. But the root mount fails with error 6, even after I type in "ufs:/dev/ad4s1a" I looked through the kernel config files and LINT and could

anyone have experiences installing SATA raid card with CentOS/RHEL? I am considering Promise FastTrak S150 Tx2 plus, FastTrack 2200 or FastTrack S150 Sx4 Which one of these ( or any othe brand) can ensure smooth install of CentOS without problems, thanks. :)Harris LIU

When I boot my Centos home file server with the latest kernel, 2.6.9-42.0.10.EL, the two Promise controllers installed in the system are unable to enable the 2nd IDE Channel on both cards due to a memory conflict. The error indicates that the next block of memory is already allocated. So the 2nd IDE channel on each card does not get enabled. Listing of the two controllers is below: 00:09.0 Mass

Hello I have this problem: Yesterday server with FreeBSD 6.0 was self restarted . In messages was this: Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: ar1: WARNING - mirror protection lost. RAID1 array in DEGRADED mode Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: ar1: writing of Intel MatrixRAID metadata is NOT supported yet Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: subdisk8: detached Mar 8 20:03:11 mail kernel: ar1: writing of Intel

Hi All, I'm about to clean and re-initialize a Maxtor 160GB disk that shows a weird problem but I think I've found a bug in RELENG_4_7 somewhere so if preserving my disk can help conquer one more bug I'm happy to wait a couple of days and help solve that bug. Here's the story: While upgrading from 4.3-STABLE to 4.7p4 and at the same time reorganizing my vinum volumes I copied

Hello. I would like to know if promise RAID cards are compatible with CentOS / RHEL ? I have seen that only SATA is supported on the RHEL hardware compatibility list. The other ATA raid cards seems not to be compatible. They give source code and promise grants compatibility with RedHat 8 and 9 but not RHEL. I would like to know if somebody tried a ATA raid card like Fasttrack TX2000, SX4000,

Hi List I have a problem with 2 drivers 1. Intel 1000 GT dosen't work correctly 2 Promise SATA 300 TX2 plus/TX4 dosen't work This is not a RAID card, just an S-ata controller for a new s-ata Hitachi 500 Gb drive I have tried CentOS-4.1 kernel, but sadly nothing Any clues anyone? Cheers Jan Erik

Hi, I have a problem, probably with the SiI 3512 SATA150 controller in a dual-Opteron IBM eServer 326: Every once a while the kernel issues a message like: ad4: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=150190687 The system waits a few seconds and continues to work normally. It typically occurs several times a day most likely depending on the load of the (SATA connected) hard drive.

I'm experiencing strange behavior from my ext3 RAID5 array and my Fedora Core 2 system. Before I go crazy varying all sorts of tuning parameters, I thought some list subscribers might provide me with useful advice. The problematic array is: 3x Promise Technology Ultra 100 TX2 PCI cards 6x Maxtor 250GB IDE drives (one drive per cable) RAID level 5, 128Kb chunk size, EXT3: "mkfs -t ext3

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Fernan Aguero <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar> wrote: > > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:05:22 -0300 > From: Fernan Aguero <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar> > To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net, > John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, re@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] Fix for

Hi, I've noticed that LLVM tends to generate suboptimal code and spill an excessive amount of registers in large functions, such as in those that are automatically generated by FFTW. LLVM generates good code for a function that computes an 8-point complex FFT, but from 16-point upwards, icc or gcc generates much better code. Here is an example of a sequence of instructions from a 32-point

I've been lurking on the list for quite a while now, and I hadn't seen much from people using FreeBSD, so I figured I'd post something. Yes, the driver in the ports tree for the digium card works! I'd heard reports that it crashes the box/etc, but I have yet to encounter that. I've had all the fun I can stand making it answer the phone, dial numbers/etc. The makefile for the

I have a Compaq something with a PII-400 and an Intel 440BX/ZX/DX chipset. I put in a Maxtor Ultra133 PCI controller (which is a Promise PDC20269, same as their TX2) and connected the hard drive thereto. Before we go on, I should say that I **hate** both Promise and Compaq. I wouldn't actually BUY this junk. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, as they say. :) (An old idiom I grew up

I have 2 Digium 4 port FXO cards in my system. The system is a P4 2.4Ghz, 512MB RAM, Promise FastTrax 100 TX2 Pro Raid, 80GB RAID1 for storage - whitebox - running RedHat 9. With pretty much any CVS HEAD version we are getting, what I will call, "phantom" calls on some lines. What I mean by a phantom call is that the line will ring, Asterisk will log that the Zap channel has been

> Close. 10/100mbps Ethernet uses wires 1,2,3,6 but that is pair 2 & 3. > Pair > one is the pair up the dead center (pins 4&5), pair 2 is pins 1&2, pair 3 > is > 3&6 and pair 4 is 7&8. A T1 uses pairs 1&2, which is why you can't use a > regular crossover cable for a T1 crossover, but you can use a regular > ethernet patch cable as a T1 patch

Hi, i did not succeed to get my test computer (Asus A7V8X-X of 2004) to boot from an isohybrid image. I tried http://www.tux.org/pub/people/kent-robotti/looplinux/rip/RIPLinux-7.0-non-X.iso which is obviously isohybrid enabled. The system has a "Promise Ultra 133 TX2" IDE controller which supercedes the mainboard BIOS. To make the system react on the USB stick i set boot option

All, I have a problem with a new Seagate hard disk. The problem occurs when i go to install CentOS, i insert the cd and start the boot up process, when it gets to the section where it detects the hard disks, the driver is seems crashes, the message it produces complains about no one caring about a interrupt on IRQ11. The hard disk is a Seagate 200GB 8MB SATA150 NCQ drive, on a SilliconImage

My server is an AIX box running samba 3.0.4. I have published a share of symlinked logfiles, because I want to publish the logs but not the full directories in which the logs live. Here are some examples: lrwxrwxrwx 1 hmrbot mis 16 Sep 08 11:43 boxaudit-exempt -> ../../ant/exempt lrwxrwxrwx 1 hmrbot mis 14 Sep 08 11:41 done.txn -> ../../txn/done