similar to: newer ZLIB and ZLIB-DEVEL

I'm just about to update ClamAV to v0.86 on a CentOS4 box having successfully done this on a 3.3 box but... configure: error: The installed zlib version may contain a security bug. Please upgrade to 1.2.2 or later: http://www.zlib.net. You can omit this check with --disable-zlib-vcheck but DO NOT REPORT any stability issues then! Any expected probs with me doing this update from the site - I

I wanted to upgrade my ClamAV but ./configure gave this error checking for zlib installation... /usr configure: error: The installed zlib version may contain a security bug. Please upgrade to 1.2.2 or later: http://www.zlib.net. You can omit this check with --disable-zlib-vcheck but DO NOT REPORT any stablility issues then! but yum gave this message # yum install zlib Gathering header information

I was looking up zlib files for another project, and noticed zlib was updated significantly this Spring, particularly in March & April of 2010. Any plans to recompile tinc to use it? http://www.zlib.net/ The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not

I'm aware R-devel no longer includes zlib. This works find on up-to-date Linux systems. On the older Centos 6 cluster at KU, they have zlib tool old for R-devel. The R-devel configure fails thus: checking if zlib version >= 1.2.5... no checking whether zlib support suffices... configure: error: zlib library and headers are required In other software, I've seen this kind of thing, so

Dear All, zlib has been removed from R-devel src/extra recently, and building R requires zlib >= 1.2.5. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (also used on Travis CI) only has 1.2.3. This means that the next version of R will probably not available on Ubuntu 12.04. (Unless I am missing something of course.) Which is probably fine, it is almost three years old now. I guess R-core is aware of this. Just wanted to

Has Centos been tested for this yet? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200507-05 ] zlib: Buffer overflow Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:23:20 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez <koon at gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-announce at lists.gentoo.org CC: full-disclosure at lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq at securityfocus.com, security-alerts at

Hi All, I am compiling R-devel on Linux (Ubuntu 16.04.2) and that works just fine, but I am missing some of the expected features, as shown here: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-admin.html#Linux In particular, after configure (using all defaults), I see: R is now configured for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu [...] Interfaces supported: X11 External libraries:

Hi, Im using OpenSSH 4.0 p1 linked with zlib version less then 1.2.2 in a number of systems. These are all production systems where I can't upgrade the service. I have a question that if I disable the compression by setting "compression no" in sshd_config, will I be able to overcome the Buffer overflow vulnerability in zlib. I just glanced through the code and it seems sshd is

There has been some talk about a zlib security problem that could let someone overflow the buffers in the zlib decompression code, potentially allowing someone to craft an exploit to execute arbitrary code. Since this is a decompression bug, this can only affect an rsync daemon if it allows uploads with the --compress option enabled. If you run a daemon that allows uploads, you may wish to add

There has been some talk about a zlib security problem that could let someone overflow the buffers in the zlib decompression code, potentially allowing someone to craft an exploit to execute arbitrary code. Since this is a decompression bug, this can only affect an rsync daemon if it allows uploads with the --compress option enabled. If you run a daemon that allows uploads, you may wish to add

Related to this question: I have installed bzip2 1.0.6 by hand, but configure still fails. When I look at config.log I get the following configure:34150: /usr/bin/gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -march=amdfam10 -g -O2 -march=amdfam10 -L/usr/local/lib64 confte st.c -lbz2 -lz -lrt -ldl -lm >&5 conftest.c: In function 'main': conftest.c:250: warning: initialization discards

Hi, I see that you are looking for new programs for the testsuite, as described in 'Compile programs with the LLVM compiler', and 'Adding programs to the llvm testsuite" on llvm.org/OpenProjects. My favourite "C source code" is ClamAV (www.clamav.net), and I would like to get it included in the testsuite. This mail is kind of long, but please bear with me, as I want

and so you will probably need to (cd src/extra/zlib; make distclean) ./configure after updating the sources, as some files have been removed that appear as dependencies. -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road,

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote: [...] > > This means that the next version of R will probably not available on Ubuntu >> > > The 'next version of R' will be 3.2.0, and the pre-3.2.0 sources include > zlib. My bad, sorry about that. I thought R-devel (trunk) will be released next, obviously not. > Whereas

We always welcome more tests. But it looks like there are two issues here. 1. The autoconf requirement. Is it possible to get one configuration working without the need for autoconf? 2. GPL license. Chris? Evan On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > Hi, > > I see that you are looking for new programs for the testsuite, as > described in 'Compile programs with

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063 Summary: Checking for zlib version 1.2.3 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All URL: http://www.zlib.net/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: bitbucket at

That recent X86 bug isn't unique to the intrinsic. We generate the same code from this which uses the shuffle sequence the vectorizers generated before the reduction intrinsics existed. declare i64 @llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.or.v2i64(<2 x i64>)· declare void @TrapFunc(i64) define void @parseHeaders(i64 * %ptr) { %vptr = bitcast i64 * %ptr to <2 x i64> * %vload = load

Necessary urgent of a version of xen that it functions. The question, my people, is that I am with a stated period for the delivery of a dedicated server, and bet in the Fedora Core 4/5, however I do not obtain to make to function the versions of xen for this. The problem is that when xen does not break, is the net (xen-br0) that it does not function... Somebody would have the RPMs functional that

What is the difference between the plugin zlib and imap-zlib ? in dovecot 1.2.X the zlib plugin works with imap....imap-zlib is a complement to zlib ?

Hi, Posting here as bugzilla is closed to registration. The zlib version checking code does not handle double digits for the patch version in the semantic versioning scheme. Consequently, a ./configure fails when using a zlib version ? 1.5.10. I suggest something like the following patch: --- a/m4/R.m4 +++ b/m4/R.m4 @@ -3116,7 +3116,7 @@ int main() { #ifdef ZLIB_VERSION /* Work around Debian