Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "STUN"
2005 May 31
2
Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working
Hi,
I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to
Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura
is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings
on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind
Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just
fine, but I can't hear
2009 Mar 05
0
Stun with hosted asterisk solution???
Howdy,
I have the following issue and would like to know if anyone has got around this before.
IP Phones - Linksys 942
Sip server - Asterisk 1.4.13
Stun server - Vovida
Ok heres the issue. We have multiple client phones on their own network behind a natted connection. We have setup the phones to be natted and also pointing to our stun server. Now when the phones make an outside call to the PSTN
2003 Sep 02
2
STUN server from Vovida
Not sure if it's alright to talk about this here???
compiled the STUN server from Vovida on RedHat 7.3. Looks simple to
configure. It isn't starting...it tries to for a long time and then just
craps out. Here is my config:/etc/sysconfig/stund
#!/bin/echo Not to execute.
# Path to stund
STUND=/usr/sbin/stund
# Set the required args for STUND
STUNDPRIMARYHOSTNAME=208.x.x.x
# The hostname
2003 Oct 15
1
SER vs STUND with Asterisk..
One for the gurus..
I have seen there has been a lot of discussion about using SER with
Asterisk.. This to me seemed like an over kill becasue it would
basically be doing most of what Asterisk is doing anyway unless you
create some weird and wonderful config in SER..
Anyway, I decided to go and have a quick read through the SER docs and
in the section about NAT they say that the best way to
2003 Oct 19
1
Music on hold...
No, you don't need a sound card.
Do you have ztdummy loaded or zaptel device in your system?
Regards,
Gus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hariga" <contact@techselesta.com>
To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 8:19 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Music on hold...
> Hi,
>
> I need a sound card and mpg123 for music on
2004 May 04
7
stun server
What is the best free stun server out there? The one that I have looked at
from vovida requires two NICs. Is this neccessary?
2003 Nov 06
1
Need testers for new STUN build system
I'm working on contributing two things for Asterisk
1) STUN suport, this will allow asterisk to detect any
NAT firewalls and enable eventual self-configuration
with respet to NAT
2) A GNU "autotools" based build system. This will
enable developers to make their code more portable
and for features to be enabled/disabled as compile
time.
As a first step
2010 Dec 13
1
Application to test STUN + broadband?
Hello
I was wondering if someone knew of an application that could check
that the user has a firewall and a broadband connection that will work
OK with Asterisk and VoIP.
The app would first perform some bandwith + jitter tests, and will
then call a STUN server to check that the firewall isn't symetric.
BTW, is Asterisk now STUN-capable, or is it still to map ports
manually on the firewall
2005 Mar 28
1
Asterisk, SER, NAT, STUN and the whole debate
Guys.
Im reading a lot about ser, nat, stun, etc. And I noticed there are a lot of
ways to get around nat but I would like to hear some success stories about
handling nat users with multiple voip phones behind nat.
I have my asterisk box behind but ports are forwarded (5060 5004 10000-20000
for rtp and 4569 for iax2) but still.. I can quite figure out what ser and
stund have to do on this
2007 May 02
1
SIP Proxy
Hi all,
I want to deploy a SIP Proxy but I just don't know which one to choose.
Researching in the Internet I found the following ones:
* SIP Express Router
<http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/SIP+Express+Router>: SER is
used by many SIP providers standalone or in conjunction with Asterisk
* Vovida.org <http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Vovida.org>
* sipX
2005 Sep 14
2
STUN vs NAT Helper
I'm wondering if anyone can recommend one over the other. I'm mostly
interested in running open source solutions, so I would prefer if
your recommendations are within the open source arena.
Basically, I contemplated the idea of using SER as a NAT Helper and
possibly as a SIP server for a portion of our user base. We prefer to
have Asterisk in the mix because of the additional
2007 Jul 05
1
SIP / STUN / Network - Help!!
Hi Everyone.
I'm in a quandry & don't know which way to go. - Obviously I'm an Asterisk
newbie although I've been watching this list for over 2 years now.
I've got an Asterisk box (actually, it's an AsteriskNOW box) up and running
here at home. - It's on my home LAN - NAT'ed behind my LinkSys router. - On
the same LAN I've got a Cisco 7940, 7960, and
2006 Apr 13
2
NAT/STUN Server
Hi,
I am trying to register SIP clients which are behind NAT on different
network. In order to achieve this goal I think I need STUN Server . I
downloaded STUN Server from
http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stun/stund_0.96_Aug13.tgz
But I don't know how to install/configure it.
And please advice me that STUN server is good idea for this scenario?
Thanks in advance
Wazb
2006 Feb 17
3
how to add stun functionality in asterisk
Hi friends !
I want to add stun functionality in asterisk.
can anybody give me some hint that how can i start that.
thanks in advance
Deepak Dhiman
2004 Oct 05
0
SIP and symmetric NAT
Hello,
I have a problem with a Grandstream being behind a symmetric nat. The
box which does the nat is a german "Fritz Box". This one does nat for
the internal network. In the internal network is a Granstream
BudgeTone 100. The nat router has a dial-up connection, so ip changes
on every dial-in.
|------------| |------------| |--------|
|Grandstream
2005 Feb 06
0
re: difference between STUN servers and far-end solutions
Hi asterisk list,
this is a bit off topic, but can anyone explain the point of the
commercial far-end solutions floating around (jasomi, for example)? or
are the far-end things just hyped up media proxies? They claim to be
b2bua devices but that's a very wide category and only implies that
the media stream passes through it - exactly what can be done with
fairly simple OSS stuff.
In short,
2005 Jan 15
0
configuring ser for *
Hi,
I currently have Asterisk running behind a linux router running nat.
Clients register with the public address and when the sip requests
reach the router, port forwarding is used to divert the traffic to *
i.e. all sip and rtp go to the asterisk box.
I now want to set up ser (so that i can have sip client with urls and
also to prevent the rtp stream going through asterisk). SER will also
be
2005 Sep 13
1
FW: Nat & Sip & Pain
Hi Ray,
I was wondering if the "qualify" option is used [in sip.conf] to keep a
connection (from the SIP phone inside the firewall to the Asterisk
server outside the firewall) open then would the firewall not allow two
way communication without incoming port mapping/NAT (providing that the
SIP phone started "talking" first)?
I'm not sure about that - I'm being
2009 Jan 31
1
where to find STUN Server howto
Hi people!
Do you guys know where to find a STUN Server Howto?! Why?! We all know,
to get Asterisk behind an NAT Router to run, is a bit tricky, and you
might have to fire a lot of holes in your firewall.
However, I would appreciate it very much if somebody could give me great
links of how to set up a STUN Server.
Tamer
2004 Apr 18
2
grandstream and stun
Hi,
I noticed some issues with how grandstream handles
stun test. GS is running version 1.0.4.50. First I
reset the NAT router. Then reboot GS, get results of
"restricted cone". Immediately reboot GS, get results
"full cone". I tried quite a few public and commercial
stun servers. Also tried different model/version of
linksys routers. I always got the same issue. Winstun
on