similar to: X100P/Zaptel on Gentoo Sparc64

I was studying the asterisk-users list archives to learn if anyone has had success with an X100P on a sparc. I noticed some postings on the subject. I am wondering if anyone has learned anything new? I have an Ultra-60 running Gentoo with 2.6.10 and udev. I built * 1.0.5 and have been enjoying various SIP configurations, with 2 sipura phones and 2 UIP200 phones (got them working!) in my home,

I know almost nothing about modern SPARC64 systems especially when they are running linux. But, can you try this command line and see if it gives more information before it blows up: rsync -vvai /export/test/ /export/test2/ On 06/28/2016 05:39 PM, alexmcwhirter at triadic.us wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: rsync seem to be broken on sparc64 > Date: 2016-06-27

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: rsync seem to be broken on sparc64 Date: 2016-06-27 23:43 From: alexmcwhirter at triadic.us To: debian-sparc at lists.debian.org I posted about this in the kernel lists a few months ago to no avail. I see it on gentoo as well with any kernel newer than 3.18. I came across this when using lxc on sparc64. The debian template uses rsync to move the

Hello everyone, Thank you nouveau developers as it seems you may almost of a solution to my lack of good graphics options for my aging sun system. I saw here before back in early December of 2011 a most of someone saying that it seemed that the nouveau drivers almost worked with him and is Sun Ultra 10. I am someone who is very fond of my Sun systems, I have two "SunBlade 100"s,

Hi list! I have been experiencing a lot of mystical hangs on my box. At first I suspected bad memory or motherboard but I found out that the mystical hangs disappear when I do not load the drivers for my x100p. The box will only hang under high load (copy operations with 30Mb/sec to a raid array in the box for example). With little or no load the box will stay up forever. (The imposed load

I just wanted to bring some attention to the experimental build of CentOS that Pasi put together for sparc64 architecture. I installed it for the first time last night on a Sun Ultra 5 (333MHz, 256MB RAM, upgraded to 40GB hard disk). I installed it over a serial console as this is a headless system. Install went flawlessly. After the install was done and it booted up, I ssh'd in as root,

Hi, I have been looking for CentOS for sparc based machines without luck. I tried to use birorrent to download it without luck. I really would appreciate anyone letting me know because I have a Sun Ultra 60 that I would love to install it on. Thanks! -- Dexter Dexter F. Stowers Systems Administrator Unix/Linux/Windows/Mac Clemson University -- Desire is the ingredient that changes the hot

Ming-Wei Shih wrote (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk) > I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586 > and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60 2x450/1GB RAM), > they are running great. > > On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box, > some hackings in the Makefiles are needed. Great stuff. Please, can you share your adjustments to the Makefiles with the community?! If you don't

I've configured an analog/single line off my mitel sx-2000 to a x100p card in my *, however when the remote caller drops the line I get a dialtone back from my pbx and the x100p doesn't detect the end of the call. Any way I can tell * to drop? I've tried call progress but it doesn't seem to work...

Hey guys, I''ve just built a sparc64 (Ultra/5) based firewall with ipp2p compiled as a module and I''m constantly getting the following message in my logs: Kernel unaligned access at TPC[100f8490] search_all_edk+0x20/0x4c [ipt_ipp2p] I''m running the following versions: - Kernel 2.6.22 - ipp2p 0.8.2-r4 - iptables 1.3.8-r1 Any thoughts?

Hey all, First off, I'd like to say many thanks to the nouveau developers! I've got a Sun Ultra 10 running Debian 6 (testing branch) with an onboard ATI card and a PCI GeForceMX 4000. So far X works fine on the ATI card, but I noticed that the DRM driver for the GF4 has a few unaligned accesses in it (see log). I can actually start X using that card, but all I get is a black screen

I am trying to build llvm on freebsd-8.0 on sparc64 CPU. I patched sources because 'sparc' enum value in include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h conflicts with gcc typedef 'sparc'. This allowed llvm itself to build successfully. But there is an error during gcc frontend compile: Did not get a target machine! Triplet is sparc64-unknown-freebsd8.0 I think this is because in many places, like in

We typically handle this by adding a "#undef sparc" in various places. For example see include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h which already has it. You'll probably need to add it to another header somewhere. -Chris On Apr 26, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Yuri wrote: > I am trying to build llvm on freebsd-8.0 on sparc64 CPU. > I patched sources because 'sparc' enum value in >

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103284 Bug ID: 103284 Summary: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference on 4.13.0-1-sparc64-smp Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Hello, I'm running Asterisk 1.0.6 with zaptel 1.0.6 on Gentoo Linux with a 2.6.11-gentoo-r2 SMP kernel (but no SMP hardware) and mpg123 0.59s-r9. When I leave a voicemail message via my X100P, the message is way too quiet. I can barely hear it. I googled this a bit, and I saw similar complaints with older versions, but no resolutions. Also, many complained that it was only too quiet via

Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in Clang and recent changes to Sparc code generator, I am happy to announce that Clang can self host itself on Linux/Sparc64 and on FreeBSD/Sparc64. However, it still fails on a few unit tests and nightly tests, primarily due to misaligned memory accesses in the code (See bugs 18482, 18500, 18502, 18536, 18693). Unlike other architectures, misaligned

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > That's really cool! Should we add note to Release Notes? Definitely. I will add a note mentioning about this in ReleaseNotes.rst. > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Venkatraman Govindaraju > <venkatra at cs.wisc.edu> wrote: >> Thanks to Jakob's work on Sparcv9 ABI in

Hi, With the talk of speex possibly mis-behaving on PPC, I decided to check the big-endian architecture I have handy - the Ultrasparc. - playback of Intel platform .spx files appears fine on the Ultra 10. - encoding a .wav file and playing back on the Ultra 10 worked too. My evaluation is that it works the same on my Ultra 10 as it did on my Intel laptop. But I must say the evaluation was made

Hi, I'm running Asterisk 1.0.8 on Gentoo, with an X100P (clone) card, and I'm having problems with Caller ID. I have run clidtest, and it seems happy enough, returning:- server clidtest # ./clidtest /dev/zap/1 Number: 0412222222, Name: MOBILE (that number's fake.) However, I'm not getting the caller ID passed through with *. Sometimes I get a "failed checksum" like

Hi, I'm running Asterisk 1.0.8 on Gentoo, with an X100P (clone) card, and I'm having problems with Caller ID. I have run clidtest, and it seems happy enough, returning:- server clidtest # ./clidtest /dev/zap/1 Number: 0412222222, Name: MOBILE (that number's fake.) However, I'm not getting the caller ID passed through with *. Sometimes I get a "failed checksum" like