similar to: ext3 writeback mode for root parition

I've just got a batch of 301s and 501s in and am trying to get them to work. I'd like to manually configure everything via FTP rather than the web or phone interfaces, but I can't seem to find a good source of definitions for all the options in the sip.cfg or phoneX.cfg files. Anyone know of any? Also, I'm having quite the problem getting the Polycom SP 501 to send *any*

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hi all, Sorry to post OT but I'm a bit stuck and I thought someone may know the answer. Originally I installed Red Hat 5.2 with 2 paritions, boot and root. I upgraded to Red Hat 6 (kept the original filesystem) without a problem some time ago, but now I want to upgrade to 7.2. When trying to install the upgrade it tells me that the boot parition isnt big enough (by about 90k!) so I thought

Full_Name: Dennis L. Warner Version: 1.07 OS: Windows2000 Submission from: (NULL) (65.122.61.34) lapack.dll, although installed in the modules subdirectory, is not found when running the dev sample.

Well, I had the first use of the recovery mode on the RH 8.0 install CD today on a dev system. I changed the mount option for the root partition to data=writeback to see what all the claimed speed increases are about, and the system failed to mount the partition r/w, so the resulting boot failed. After search usenet, it seems other RH folks have had this problem, possibly because it is

I'm trying to increase the performance of an NFS server running Red Hat Linux 7.3 and using ext3. This server sees hefty read & write activity and I've been getting a lot of complaints that writing to the disks is taking a long time. The hardware is ample (Dell PE 2650 with 2x2.4GHz Xeons, 6GB RAM, PERC3-DC RAID controller & attached PowerVault 220S) and network connectivity

hallo, i have a form like this: <% form_tag :action => "foo1" <%=select_tag ("user", "name", options_for_select(someArray))%> <%=select_tag ("formdata", "language1", options_for_select(someArray))%> <%=radio_button ("formdata", "language1_level, 3%> <% end> the controller has 2 functions,

Hi, I''ve hit an issue with the free space cache. It looks like we miss writing everything to disk on unmount under rough conditions. Setup: git head cmason/master, /dev/sdv1 is a 55MB partition on an SSD. Run the following script: -- DEV=/dev/sdv1 MP=/mnt/scratch umount $MP mkfs.btrfs -M $DEV mount -o inode_cache $DEV $MP cat /dev/urandom | head -c 654321 > $MP/1 mkdir $MP/2 mv

The writeback code uses an empty implementation for its encoder. Replace the code with the generic simple encoder. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_writeback.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_writeback.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_writeback.c index 43d9e3bb3a94..cefb500c4ed7

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:33:28 +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Hi list, > I would like to understand if, and why, the --unsafe flag is needed when > using --copy-storage-all when migrating guests which uses writeback > cache mode. > > Background: I want to live migrate guests with writeback cache from host > A to host B and these hosts only have local storage (ie: no

On 17/02/2017 19:50, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > Yeah storage migration should be safe regardless of the cache mode used. > Very good news, thanks. Let me be paranoid: is it *surely* safe? > > This looks like a bug in libvirt. The code doesn't check whether an > affected disk is going to be migrated (--copy-storage-all) or accessed > on the shared storage. > > Jirka

From: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> When the filesystem is readonly, commit transaction is forbiddened. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> --- fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c index

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:52:06PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote: >Hi all, >I write about libvirt inconsistent behavior when mixing io=native and >cache=writeback. This post can be regarded as an extension, or >clarification request, of BZ 1086704 >(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086704) > >On a fully upgraded CentOS6 x86-64 machine, starting a guest with

Hello, I read some threads (some of them not very recent, and perhaps not up to date) and I have not found a clear answer to these: Is it advisable to have /tmp set up with data=writeback option in general? Is it again true if we are considering a laptop? Do I have also to consider writecache of disks in this case or are they totally non related? How to check/set the state of writecache for

Hi everybody, I had a problem which you may be interested in. I set data=writeback in /etc/fstab for each of my ext3 partitions (because it complains on "mount -o remount,data=writeback" with "ext3: journal mode can't be altered on remount" or similar) and rebooted. Problem: / was mounted read-only, I couldn't remount it (because mount appends the options from fstab,

Hi list, I would like to understand if, and why, the --unsafe flag is needed when using --copy-storage-all when migrating guests which uses writeback cache mode. Background: I want to live migrate guests with writeback cache from host A to host B and these hosts only have local storage (ie: no shared storage at all). From my understanding, --unsafe should be only required when migrating

Hi all, I write about libvirt inconsistent behavior when mixing io=native and cache=writeback. This post can be regarded as an extension, or clarification request, of BZ 1086704 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086704) On a fully upgraded CentOS6 x86-64 machine, starting a guest with io=native and cache=writeback is permitted: no errors are raised and the VM (qemu, really)

How can I use fdisk to partition when installing CentOS4 instead of using 'auto' or disk-druid I want to make RAID 'fd' type partitions for hda and hdc I tried every ctrl-alt Fx and can't get to a shell TIA Gerald

Hello, I have installed centos using automatic partition. I would like to partition my hard disk to /, /var/, /usr, /home separately. Is it possible now to partition post installation. I also need to have FAT32 partition to share files from between ntfs and linux. Thank you, centoser. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

After many long hours and a lot of help from Tom I was able to get IPSEC running on kernel 2.6, here''s a step-by-step for Getting Policy match working.. Hope it helps Adding Policy Match Support to Kernel 2.6 JJ Truax jtruax at optivel dot com This is a step by step how-to for adding policy match support to a 2.6 kernel. For information on configuring IPSEC for the Kernel 2.6 see Tom