similar to: Asterisk chooses invalid outgoing interface (IAX2, virtual interfaces)

Hi all, I try to receive an ipv6 address for my PPP link via autoconf (against Cisco machine), but there is a problem I'm unable to solve so far. I can see cisco's Router-Advertisement containing prefix etc., but no IP adress is assigned to tun0 interface. Anyone succesful in IPv6 over dial-up PPP connection? When I manually assign IPv6 address, connection works. My system is

>> I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a >> bridge and assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All >> guests have an ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests >> in this libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the host. >[...] >> and tinc.conf like this >[...] >> Interface = tun0 >>

Hi, after trying for days I ended up with a working tinc configurazion of 2 subnets, now my goal is to add 2 more subnets and comunicate. I might seem dumb at this point but honestly I don't work in IT or Networking stuff, and so I dont have that deep knowledge. A little explanation of my configuration is HOST A (VPN server) Public IP: 1.2.3.4 tun0 Subnet = 192.168.10.0/24 tun0 IP =

Is there a way to have tinc change the interface according to whether it thinks it is successfully connected to a [external] next hop? We've got a problem where the tinc provided tun0 is sitting there (obviously not going anywhere because there's no uplink via eth0 or whatever anymore after a suspend/resume cycle & having moved locations) but various programs see that as "an

Hi ! First of all, I am sorry if this is not the list for that, but I've been learning (a little bit...) a way to implement a freeBSD firewall. So far I came up with a set of rules I would like to show you for commenting. I am sure there're a lot of errors and/or stupid rules (I am not sure the rules order is good for what I need) and I would be really pleased if one could have a look

Hi, I am trying to access devices (ip cams) through clients using the tinc vpn. Let's demonstrate the problem with two clients: client name [ip in eth0] [ip in tun0] gl752 (A) 192.168.1.33 10.0.0.1 xps13 (B) 192.168.1.55 10.0.0.2 I also have an ip camera connected to the local network at 192.168.1.21. I want to try a situation where I am accessing, from linux box

>> Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for >> routing local nets to the remote host. >> This way a remote host can access the provided local nets. >> >> What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24). >> My host A has a bridge to the vm's network. The bridge has the IP >> 192.168.1.1. Furthor more

Good morning. Is there any way to force wine to use a specific network interface? I have the following setup: eth0 internet interface tun0 openvpn some programs use broadcasting (Starcraft). I don't know how it determines which device to use. It probably takes the first it does see. (Or is it wine doing that ?) the problem is that starcraft just send the packages out via eth0. for windows

/-----------------------\ | | |eth0 |eth0 |-------| |-------| | |eth1 eth1 | | -------- A |____ _______| B |----- | | \ / | | --------| | | --------| | | | |

Hi, I posted this question yesterday on the Openvpn mailing list, with no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1:

>> >> Nice hint, but it's not this simple. Libvirt complains about the >> network not the interface. The interfaces have different names already. >> It seems like tinc bind the subnet on startup and libvirt doesn't >> like it > Well, if it's about the subnet, then it's up to you to change the > Subnets in the host config files (and change

I''m getting my zones confused. Help. I need to have a bunch of systems using OpenVPN to gain an IP in the virtual subnet 10.100.1.0/24, on interface tun0. I will then route whole subnets to those IPs, like 10.100.2.0/24 via 10.100.1.12, etc. I want to have a policy for: - all hosts behind tun0 - all hosts in 10.100.1.0/24 - individual subnets being routed through IPs in

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.101 metric 425 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel

On 12/29/2017 3:59 AM, Wojciech ?ysiak wrote: > firstly check which zone are your interface in : > > bash> firewall-cmd --get-active-zones > > then all you have to do is add a service to the firewall > > firewall-cmd --zone=<INSERT YOUR ZONE> --add-service=openvpn --permanent > > assuming that your Openvpn is running on standard port 1194/tcp|udp, > If not

Hello all, We have a few aliased Ethernet addresses on our server and if I do not use the Bind statement in the "Global" section then the NMBD seems to try to bind to all of the addresses. We are actually using OpenVPN which make the connections just fine on a 172.16.x.x subnet to "tun0" device. The problem is that Samba does not seem to find the tun0 device and reports

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1:

When using shorewall with a road warrior openvpn setup, how can I get the tun interface to masq through a lan interface? Example Setup: Machine A (tun0 10.0.0.1) -----------VPN---------(tun0 10.0.0.2)---------Machine B(10.10.10.1) When I ping Machine B from Machine B, Machine B is receiving the echo request, but it doesn''t know the route back to the 10.0.0.0/24, and there

? ? ? Hi, all:? ? ? ? ? I'm playing with Gre Tunnel programming in centos 6. ? ? ? ?? ? ? ? ? I wrote my program in these steps:? ? ? ? ? a, open /dev/net/tun ?device and ioctl with?TUNSETIFF, get fd to tun device, say "tun0"; ? ? ? ? b, create one socket and use it to set tun0's ?ip address, namyly?SIOCSIFADDR and?SIOCSIFDSTADDR; and then turn it up; ? ? ? ? c, create one raw

the fact that ssh insists on tap* and tun* tun/tap-device-names is a real nag and prevents from nice and easy solutions in some cases. the channel type used for tun/tap forwarding is tun at openssh.com, and it defines the remote tunnel id to be integer. so from what i understood these packet definitions are static per channel type, so for compatiblity the tun at openssh.com type has to stay,