similar to: [OT] SPARC platforms -- WAS: Hot swap CPU

From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> > Btw, don't quote me on this one :) > I'm only 90% sure of the hotswapping capabilities, and less than 50% > sure about the price :) There _are_ systems with hot-swap CPUs, memory and/or, PCI[-X] slots. They are _not_ commodity and pricey, and require OS-level support. In fact, I believe Linux 2.6 has some support for

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > Compiles aren't a great benchmark for a box since its 100% cpu and > neglects memory or disk performance but I had the numbers handy > for that :-) BTW, it is 100% ALU and a major strain on the ALU LOAD. In other words, it's not a good benchmark for even CPU. That's why the 3-issue ALU in the Nx586 on-ward blows the

I've been planning to build a dual Opteron server for awhile. I'd like to get people's suggestions on a suitable motherboard. I've looked at the Tyan K8SE (S2892) and K8SRE (S2891) but would like to find more Linux-specific experiences with these boards. Some features I expect are at least 4 SATA (SATA-300?) ports, serial console support in the BIOS, USB 2.0 and IEEE-1394

From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl> > That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel > Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about? It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors. But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation, the same thing popped into my mind that popped

From: Bruno Delbono <bruno.s.delbono at mail.ac> > I'm really sorry to start this thread again but I found something very > interesting I thought everyone should ^at least^ have a look at: > http://uadmin.blogspot.com/2005/06/4-dual-xeon-vs-e4500.html > This article takes into account a comparision of 4 dual xeon vs. e4500. > The author (not me!) talks about "A

Hi, I am getting the following error: dovecot: Jul 23 18:04:44 Error: child 7600 (imap) killed with signal 10 How to reproduce: Try to delete or move a mail to another folder. The mail actually gets copied to the other folder but the original isn't removed (when using webmail). If using thunderbird this ends up in an infinite loop creating new mails in the destination folder (without

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > It is a valid benchmark though :-) compile speed is a actually a > good measure for any integer app that is small enough to run in > large cache... Image processing, oil companies for their simulations, > cad... they all act very similar to compile benchmark - if a compile > is twice as fast, a software image rendering is usually

From: Chris Mauritz <chrism at imntv.com> > <snipped> > Oy....I'm terribly sorry. Moderator, please delete my previous > message. It was supposed to be a private message to Peter. Bryan, > please accept my apology. It wasn't my intention to riducule you in > public. honest injun.... > <blush> > Must drink less coffee.... No apology required,

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > When have I ever argued about that chipset design is better? :-) > Opteron is a great example that you can do it better... > Where did you even get the idea I am fixated on that??? http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-June/007341.html "<even more anal>Except the iommu, those are limitations of chipset, bus and

One of the things that I''ve been asked to look at lately is interrupt load spreading, and intrd, to improve the network performance of CMT systems. From my read of the code, it looks like intrd only knows about virtual processors. This has major breakage in that all the virtual processors on a single core in a Niagra system share the common interrupt logic. I.e. when the

Hello, I've run into some issues building Samba 4.20.2 due to problems concerning Heimdal. First, I am unable to build with the embed Heimdal due to a variety of errors during compilation of the embedded heimdal. As result, I built a "system" heimdal using the current master branch of heimdal from GitHub. Then I tried to build Samba again using the --with-system-heimdalkrb5, but it

Hi, When i want load eclipse with wine 1.1.22 I obtained this error : # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x7ec06ec4, pid=27, tid=28 # # JRE version: 6.0_14-b08 # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (14.0-b16 mixed mode windows-x86 ) # Problematic frame: # C [comctl32.dll+0x86ec4] # # If you would like

Hi, I checked the sendmail and it is: [root at godslove root]# which sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail Plesk uses sendmail and this is what is listed in my form that was working. I tried my form at 7:27 am this morning and this is the last listing in /var/log/messages Jul 3 07:05:42 godslove authpsa: IMAP connect from @ [67.138.221.157] There are no listings in /var/log/maillog. These are the

Ming-Wei Shih wrote (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best Linux for Asterisk) > I am running * CVS head on Gentoo/i586 > and Gentoo/Sparc64 (US60 2x450/1GB RAM), > they are running great. > > On sparc64 * does not compile out-of-the-box, > some hackings in the Makefiles are needed. Great stuff. Please, can you share your adjustments to the Makefiles with the community?! If you don't

Well, the real issue then seems to be that .roman2numeric uses an invalid regular expression: >> grepl("^M{,3}D?C{,4}L?X{,4}V?I{,4}$", cc) > [1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE or >> grepl("^I{,2}$", c("II", "III", "IIII")) > [1] TRUE TRUE FALSE Both the TRE and the PCRE specification only allow repetition quantifiers of the

Hi, I'm just considering buying two Telecoms grade Sun Netra's to run a lab-based VoIP solution. Not my immediate thoughts as a VoIP platform, but from what I've heard, they can run Linux, and run it well. Only thing is: The Wiki and the Whitepaper just state that Asterisk is for the x86 architecture, but has been compiled to run on PPC architectures. No mention of UltraSparc.

Should it be possible to hot-swap SATA drives with Centos5? It doesn't seem to work on my system. Removing an unmounted drive locked the system up, and leaving one out at bootup makes the devices change names and keeps grub from finding /boot on a scsi drive that is shifted up. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

>>>>> Jani V?limaa >>>>> on Tue, 14 Jan 2025 20:39:19 +0200 writes: > Hello, > I don't know what's changed or how to figure out why as.roman() started > to work different way lately on Mageia Cauldron. Cauldron is the > latest development version of Mageia Linux. > Expected bahavior: >>

>>>>> Stephanie Evert >>>>> on Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:18:03 +0100 writes: > Well, the real issue then seems to be that .roman2numeric uses an invalid regular expression: >>> grepl("^M{,3}D?C{,4}L?X{,4}V?I{,4}$", cc) >> [1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE > or >>> grepl("^I{,2}$", c("II",

I am about to lease another server to be a backup web/mail server with a replicated mysql database. The current live server is a dual Xeon 2.8Ghz. Would I do better to get another Xeon server or an Opteron based server? My concerns are compatibility of the database and the SSL certificate currently running on the Xeon machine. Are these concerns unfounded? TIA Mike