similar to: Vote for CentOS - AGAIN :)

The Linux Journal's 2002 Readers' Choice poll is open. Vorbis is featured in the Favorite Audio Tool category, so go vote for your favorite codec! Actually, you even have the choice of voting for "ogg123" or for "Vorbis Tools", since it seems someone at Linux Journal is not quite aware of what Vorbis Tools contain. I suggest voting for "Vorbis Tools", so that

CentOS has been nominated for an award in the Linux User awards. Please vote for CentOS !! Voting finishes tomorrow - 13th September. Please vote at :- http://www.linuxawards.co.uk/index.php You will need to vote for all categories otherwise the vote wont count. Thanks Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

Hi, Are there FreeNX rpms for RHE4/CentOS4 anywhere? Thanks, Adrian

Hello, I think this is an easy one for the average Rails developer but I''m a bit stuck. I''m creating a simple voting app: any user can create a survey, with any number of questions, and other users can then vote by creating a ballot for that survey. Here''s the modeling: class Survey < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :questions has_many :eligibilities has_many

Hi all, LLVM needs a solution to the long-standing problem that the IR is unable to express certain semantics expected by high-level programming languages that target GPUs. Solving this issue is necessary both for upstream use of LLVM as a compiler backend for GPUs and for correctly supporting LLVM IR <-> SPIR-V roundtrip translation. It may also be useful for compilers targeting

Hil list! I'm trying to authenticate Active Directory Users via freeradius. I can do it in a general case (user and domain) without problem. Now I have to do it restricting the authentication to the members of a group. I can exect the script (as is put in radiusd.conf) correct from the command line: Deb:~# /usr/bin/ntlm_auth --username=javi2 --require-membership-of='AAMM\MyGroup'

Hi All, I'm wondering about something that seems a bit odd. I've setup a CentOS 4 box for a client that is "still" using dial-up and to activate the connection appears to require root privileges. Why is this? The reason Linux was loaded on this box was to provide a very functional box that could be easily locked down so when the cat was away the mice couldn't play,

it is that time again to let your choices be known in one of the mainstream journals http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/readers-choice-awards - rh

My completely empty model (no validation callbacks etc etc) takes an average of 0.05 seconds to create, at least according to Benchmark.realtime{200.times{Message.create(:from => "me@here.com", :message_type => ''email'', :subject => "hello", :body => "goodbye", :sent_at => Time.now)}}/200 That''s a little slower than

Hi, I have many example of HTB GUI . All is already well developed, which discussed in this link. However, can anyone teach me what software to use to build a own web based GUI HTB software in Fedoracore ( Linux based) ? Thanks Regards Alan _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Has Centos been tested for this yet? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200507-05 ] zlib: Buffer overflow Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:23:20 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez <koon at gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-announce at lists.gentoo.org CC: full-disclosure at lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq at securityfocus.com, security-alerts at

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:05 AM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > for (...) { > > ballot(); > > if (... /* non-uniform */) continue; > > } > > > > into > > > > for (...) { > > do { > > ballot(); > > } while (... /* non-uniform */); > > } > > I'm not sure if I follow

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:09 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 == 0) continue; > > > > bar = ballot(true); // ballot 2 > > } > > > > versus: > > > > int i =

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:20 AM Jan Sjodin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 > == 0) continue; > > > > > > > > bar =

I don't see how this would fix the continue vs. nested loop problem I explained earlier. That is, how would this prevent turning: for (...) { ballot(); if (... /* non-uniform */) continue; } into for (...) { do { ballot(); } while (... /* non-uniform */); } and vice versa? Note that there's no duplication going on here, and the single-threaded flow of control is

Strong agree with Mehdi, I am also not really sure what is the proposal at this point so it's hard to comment further. > There are a number of questions that I have. Do we need better machine descriptions so that various resources can be considered? Do we need the capability to reason about the machine state for the cross-lane operations to enable more optimizations? Are intrinsics the

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jan Sjodin <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) { > > > > foo = ballot(true); // ballot 1 > > > > > > > > if (threadID /* ID of the thread within a wavefront/warp */ % 2 > == 0) continue; > > > > > > > > bar = ballot(true); //

Hi all, I'm trying to use wine, and I downloaded the recent rpm packages for my FedoraCore, I installed it, but wen I want to run any wine binary it fail with 'segmentation fault' error message I also tryed winelauncher, and it sad 'wine has exited with a failure status of 139' Can anybody tell me what's the problem Thanks in advance Kovacs Alpar

On 31.01.19 15:59, Jan Sjodin wrote: >> >  Any transform that re-arranges control flow would potentially have to >> >  know about the properties of ballot(), and the rules with respect to >> >  the CFG (and maybe consider the target) to know where to insert the >> >  intrinsics. > >> But the same is true for basically any approach to handling this. In