similar to: ADSI unlock codes

I need some help in defining a "print" method for my new S4 class definition. So fer I have worked like this: setClass("MyClass", sealed=F, representation(slot1 = "list", #create a new class slot2 = "vector", slot3 = "vector", slot4 = "vector")) setMethod("print",

Dear, We release new VMKnoppix 5.3.1DVD(20080827). HP: http://www.rcis.aist.go.jp/project/knoppix/vmknoppix/index.html Guide-PDF: http://www.rcis.aist.go.jp/project/knoppix/vmknoppix/VMKnoppix-20080827-E.pdf ### Special Feature ### # Virtual TPM is supported on Xen and KVM/QEMU. The virtual machines are used for Trusted Computing. # The LiveCD of trusted computing (GRUB-IMA, Linux-IMA

This may be, or may not be a security issue, however, since alot of people still use tripwire-1.2 or lesser versions(this is what shipped with R.H. Linux 5.2 at least), they might be interested in following detail: Chuck Campbell (campbell@neosoft.com) pointed me out that tripwire dies with coredump on R.H. linux, if it hits a filename containing 128-255 characters. Playing a bit with debugger I

> On Hexagon, the slot assignment is determined by the layout of the > instructions in memory. The order of the instructions in the packet does > not matter either in the IR, nor in the .s file, but it does when the > packet is encoded into the actual machine code. In LLVM, the Hexagon > shuffler orders the instructions just prior to encoding. > > Specifically, the

Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-26~bpo50+1 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- I've installed the following packages an lenny, which are working well on other maschines. # dpkg -l | grep xen | grep bpo ii libxenstore3.0 4.0.1-1~bpo50+1 Xenstore communications library for Xen ii linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-xen-686 2.6.32-26~bpo50+1 Linux 2.6.32 for modern

Sure I will split it and put it in two patches. Give me few hours. I need to test those patches. Sirish On 4/19/2012 8:40 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:18:05PM -0500, Sirish Pande wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a patch for Hexagon Packetizer for review. This patch does >> not yield any warnings. >> > Would it be possible to split this