similar to: Multiple system updates

Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org wrote: >Not only that, but people forget that SPARC is not sold by just Sun. >SPARC is an IEEE standard licensed under "fair and non-discriminatory" >terms. The SPARC ISA and most architectural details are freely >available. Yep - but what is your point with bringing that up? >The _majority_ of my Solaris/SPARC experience in more

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > Compiles aren't a great benchmark for a box since its 100% cpu and > neglects memory or disk performance but I had the numbers handy > for that :-) BTW, it is 100% ALU and a major strain on the ALU LOAD. In other words, it's not a good benchmark for even CPU. That's why the 3-issue ALU in the Nx586 on-ward blows the

From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> > Btw, don't quote me on this one :) > I'm only 90% sure of the hotswapping capabilities, and less than 50% > sure about the price :) There _are_ systems with hot-swap CPUs, memory and/or, PCI[-X] slots. They are _not_ commodity and pricey, and require OS-level support. In fact, I believe Linux 2.6 has some support for

I've been planning to build a dual Opteron server for awhile. I'd like to get people's suggestions on a suitable motherboard. I've looked at the Tyan K8SE (S2892) and K8SRE (S2891) but would like to find more Linux-specific experiences with these boards. Some features I expect are at least 4 SATA (SATA-300?) ports, serial console support in the BIOS, USB 2.0 and IEEE-1394

From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl> > That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel > Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about? It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors. But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation, the same thing popped into my mind that popped

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > It is a valid benchmark though :-) compile speed is a actually a > good measure for any integer app that is small enough to run in > large cache... Image processing, oil companies for their simulations, > cad... they all act very similar to compile benchmark - if a compile > is twice as fast, a software image rendering is usually

From: Peter Arremann <loony at loonybin.org> > When have I ever argued about that chipset design is better? :-) > Opteron is a great example that you can do it better... > Where did you even get the idea I am fixated on that??? http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-June/007341.html "<even more anal>Except the iommu, those are limitations of chipset, bus and

List, Being pretty new to CentOS and such, can someone answer a couple of questions about yum and up2date? I think I got the basic info, but I'm a bit confused about what does what. I configured yum to use the dag repo (I think) but now and then, I get the red circle from up2date stuff on the upper menubar. I have been using the up2date function to grab the latest bits when

I got this updates to do but the package requires a newer version of mozilla, and I can't install it, I get the following error message. Thanks There was a package dependency problem. The message was: Unresolvable chain of dependencies: devhelp-0.10-0.2.el4.centos4 requires mozilla = 37:1.8 The following packages were added to your selection to satisfy dependencies: Package

Pardon the newbie question, but I thought I'd check with you guys here since I couldn't find the answer to this one on CentOS web site. I installed CentOS 3.4 (needed an equivalent of RHEL 3.4 for a very specific purpose - not interested in newer releases at this point) and downloaded all available up2date stuff. However, Apache is at v2.0.46, php is at 4.3.4, and so on - which are

How can I install a lot (more than 800) of APT packages using an easy way in puppet? I mean, using some file.txt where I put there the packages I want to install and my package resource get the list . Is it possible? Or do I have to put all packages in the package resource? regards, Israel. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed

I'm still trying to get an idea about how best to handle patches on CentOS. Say I want to apply security patches automatically on a nightly basis. But when the push from 4.2 to 4.3 comes around, I want to defer that for when I can do it manually. Is that possible? (Preferably with yum, but I would use up2date if that were necessary.) Also, I'm used to doing 'yum update'. I

Which is better? Why? I know yum is the official update mechanism here and in Fedora Core, but that doesn't make yum better than up2date any more than Windows NT was better than OS/2. Let's try to keep the discussion objective:-) I'm asking, hoping for some insights into why RH might (apparently) be moving to yum in preference to up2date (yum is now used within Anaconda). Other

On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 08:44 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 08:44 -0400, Peter Arremann wrote: > > *sighs* BS level exceeded... > > DVD-RAM is the most reliable, long-term optical archiving format. Well other than the name, it does not have anything in common with DVD because IIRC it's a Magneto Optical drive ... totally different Tech. Paul

CentOS3.9 Users: After applying all Updates to Upgrade from CentOS 3.8 CentOS 3.9 I find up2date no longer works "correctly" (or shall I say NOT as before)... Missing is the "sources" File!!! Is this how V 4.5.5-7 is supposed to be or is the "sources" File omission an "error"??? Lawrence Houston -- (centos at greenfield.dyndns.org)

Centos 4 i386 [root at fiftyeight ~]# up2date -u lynx There was a fatal error communicating with the server. The message was: An HTTP error occurred: URL: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/extras/i386//headers/header.info Status Code: 404 Error Message: Not Found -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - -

I have found a few issues with puppet and the up2date provider (version 0.22.4) that I''d like to run by those who use up2date (to see if others are experiencing the same issues). 1. Puppet doesn''t seem to find the latest updates of packages that are already installed. In looking at "/usr/lib/site_ruby/1.8/puppet/provider/package/up2date.rb", I found that

Hello, I have this cheap network card which insists on me compiling its own sundance.ko module every time I update my kernel release. I had the poor idea to leave nightly yum service enabled on this remote server, only to find my network was gone at the following reboot. Had to go there, figure out that kernel stuff is carefully avoided by up2date, but not so by yum service, and rebuild. Compiling

I''m troubled with a node-definition not able to resolve a class: Could not find class rhnsd::common at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp: 8 on node X Content of manifest/site.pp: import "nodes.pp" [...] The layout of modules/rhnsd/ is: |-- files | `-- up2date-rhn |-- manifests | |-- client.pp | |-- common.pp | |-- init.pp | `-- rhn.pp A `cat'' from each

i updated to the latest up2date rpm.... then when updating to the latest kernel this is what happened after i ran up2date -fu for the kernel/kernel-source updates Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 1174, in ? sys.exit(main() or 0) File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 772, in main