similar to: Login Incorrect Message

I see. If I am writing my own listener can I still get back the (llvm::Function, void* Code, size_t Size)? Ciao. -----Original Message----- From: Kaylor, Andrew [mailto:andrew.kaylor at intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:24 PM To: Manny Ko Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC No. It adds a new event,

No. It adds a new event, 'NotifyObjectEmitted'. The Intel JIT listener that I mentioned then uses the emitted object to find the functions (which are all emitted together). Because of the way that MCJIT is implemented, it isn't really feasible to reconstruct things like the EmittedFunctionDetails in the NotifyFunctionEmitted event. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: Manny Ko

Thanks Andrew for the update. Does it support NotifyFunctionEmitted? Cheers. -----Original Message----- From: Kaylor, Andrew [mailto:andrew.kaylor at intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:06 PM To: Manny Ko Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine

Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the version I have been using. If it is already implemented than it is very good news. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Eli Bendersky [mailto:eliben at google.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:25 AM To: Manny Ko Cc: Albert Graef; Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT

The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine when a new object is emitted, but the profiling listeners do not do anything with the events (and I don't expect they will before the 3.2 release becomes official). I have implemented some code in trunk since the 3.2 branch to traverse the emitted object and pick out named functions in the IntelJITEventsListener. An

Ops. I meant to say 3.1. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Manny Ko Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:27 AM To: Eli Bendersky Cc: Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the

I have a closed network (no outside access) with a small user base (less than 20), with no other network connections) running Samba 1.9.18p10 on Solaris 2.4. Problem: Some users utilize the workstations on the network as stand alone systems. They need access to printers, but I don't want to create an account just for this purpose. I would like to provide access to the printers without

I've been downloading a software for a friend with wget, but as my connexion to internet is not so good, wget downloaded in three parts by example: SetupDxLabelMakerSoftonic.exe SetupDxLabelMakerSoftonic.exe.1 SetupDxLabelMakerSoftonic.exe.1.1 My question is: Is there any way to join all of this or Do I have to download that again? Hope an answer thanks to all manny -- "Nuestra

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Manny Ko <Manny.Ko at imgtec.com> wrote: > I know the old JIT pretty well but have only used the MCJIT from the client side. Most of my experience is on the x86backend though. > > Another critical feature missing from MCJIT is the JITEventListener. This is usually for supporting debuggers and profiling tools. What makes you say it is missing? Eli

I'm running CentOS 4 with Blue Quartz on a white box, and having problems with installing Portsentry vi the .tar.gz route. Various errors, etc. Anyone here know of a source, like an RPM or something, for Portsentry for CentOS? ... or a similar app? thnx, Manny

Can't read your paper because the permission is not set. Chuck On 2/25/2011 12:16 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > Hi, Andrey, > > sorry for the delay: I made a page with the code available for > download: > http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~douglas/projects/RangeAnalysis/RangeAnalysis.html >

Hi everyone, This is off topic and is for GS technical support really but it seems that there are a lot of Budge Tone 100/101/102 users out there. I've got a Budge Tone-100 (101 - without the extra 10base ethernet connetion?) here. I changed the configuration through its web based interface and I clicked the reboot link. But then something went wrong and ever since then it doesn't

Hi all I have a CentOS 4.4 Kernel 2.6.9-11.EL Samba (smbd -V) 3.0.10-1.4E.9 I've been using this server as a small file server recently i needed to do a backup (ntbackup to file) and the backup fails randomly, the largest backup file i managed was about 3GBytes I tried copying large files and randomly the connection is lost I tried with a ping at the same time and the replies don't

I could not find another thread that talked about this but all my searched pulled up manny manny results so I may have overlooked some. The problem I have is that I recently upgraded my ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04 and the new version of wine (1.1.2) has broken my setup. I run a machine with multiple user (5) and to simplify my life all there Microsoft software they needed was installed under wine and

I gueess it is not a DNS problem, because either using name or IP, I have always the problem. I guess the problem is that I am using ssh on inetd.conf (sshd -i), so It has to generate a key each time I start a session. What do you think ? -----Mensagem original----- De: Dan Kaminsky [mailto:dan at doxpara.com] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 10 de junho de 2002 20:51 Para: Jorge Cleber Teixeira de

Please can someone advise me how I can adjust correlations using bonferroni's correction? I am doing manny correlation tests as part of an investigation of the validity/reliability of a psychometric measure. Help would be so appreciated! Cheers, Louise

Hi Douglas, On 21.02.2011 20:27, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote: > My work is not part of the LLVM mainline yet. But I would be happy to > contribute with the code of my range analysis implementation if it can help > you in something else. We were thinking of adding VRP to LLVM too, though we were mostly interested in Patterson's approach (i.e. not connected with SSI form). It

Hi, I'm trying to use exception control by LLVM. In the demo page, I got : declare i8* @llvm.eh.exception() nounwind But, when a try to emit the code by llvm engine, the name is generate with the sufix .132 ( llvm.eh.exception.132 ) and the Function::getIntrinsicID abort the program. It was so : Intrinsic::getDeclaration(llvm_module,Intrinsic::memset,&Tys,1); Now, it's

%FIRSTSTRU = type { i32, double, i32, i8* } struct { int var1; double var2; int var3; char *var4; }firstStru ; Could someone help? If, running a application in windows with MSVC, I allocate a memmory buffer and call a LLVM function with such buffer, there's a structure alignment problem. If the LLVM function call a C function using the same buffer, it runs fine. Any ideas?

Hi, guys, Thanks a lot for your help. As you know, I am trying to implement something to change the types of the instructions. And I chose the trunc's approach because it seems be simple. But I still have some problems and questions. Would be great if you can help me. I have used the results of my range analysis implementation to change the intermediate representation. I am using