similar to: hardened gentoo (selinux) asterisk problem

Has anyone experienced any issues with Samba (3.0.24-r3), specifically with ADS domain joins, running on Hardened Gentoo 2007.0 (kernel 2.6.21 / AMD64)? I get "CLDAP Request Failed" error messages when attempting to do a net ads join, which has been successful with numerous other systems. This is familiar territory for us and a new issue never seen before. Thanks.

Hi, I have just installed the fresh svn version of asterisk and when I run it I get the following errors: [Mar 4 14:19:27] WARNING[24527]: loader.c:728 load_modules: No 'modules.conf' found, no modules will be loaded. [Mar 4 14:19:27] NOTICE[24527]: manager.c:2681 init_manager: Unable to open management configuration manager.conf. Call management disabled. [Mar 4 14:19:27] NOTICE[24527]:

After emerging some updates this morning asterisk 1.0.3 fails to start I get the following errors: ..Jan 6 00:39:24 WARNING[28998]: chan_zap.c:765 zt_open: Unable to specify channel 1: No such device or address Jan 6 00:39:24 ERROR[28998]: chan_zap.c:6197 mkintf: Unable to open channel 1: No such device or address here = 0, tmp->channel = 1, channel = 1 Jan 6 00:39:24 ERROR[28998]:

Hi all, Please forgive what may be an OT question: I'm considering using hardened php and am interested in any comments which may be offered regarding hardened php and CentOS5. For reference: http://www.hardened-php.net/hardening_patch.14.html Is hardened php available as an RPM from any of our fine CentOS repositories? If not, I'd feel less inclined to use it as it affects core areas

Hi, I am running nut with megatec driver accessing ttyS0 as user nut on "standard" kernel (gentoo-sources). It works fine. However, I just built a hardened kernel on a new gentoo machine and have no experience with it. NUT (upsdrv) is failing because it says it doesn't have permission to access ttyS0 even though nut is within the appropriate group. I can add user = root in ups.conf

Installed R-devel 3.2.3 on a vanilla F23 box. Installing any package with C code fails with: gcc: error: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1: No such file or directory This parameter originates from R's CFLAGS: $ R CMD config CFLAGS -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches

Can anyone recommend a hardened CentOS distro?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Michael Smith <my.r.help at gmail.com> wrote: > > dnf install redhat-rpm-config I used: yum install /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 And that did the job, however it seems to me this should be a formal dependency of the R-base rpm package.

Is anyone running Lumenvox on Gentoo? My asterisk install has been running like a champ for a few years now and I really hate the thoughts of changing distros just for Lumenvox. Here is my issue: The engine needs the libs from boost. I emerged boost and noticed that there were four libs that the engine were looking for that were not installed via portage. libboost_regex.so.2

I got some problem with wine (since wine 1.1.13) on hardened-sources ... actually using ... kernel -> 2.6.28-hardened-r7 #1 SMP Mon Apr 6 17:41:50 CEST 2009 x86_64 gcc -> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened Code: __bb_init_func': preloader.c:(.text+0x4f): undefined reference to `__guard' preloader.c:(.text+0x70): undefined reference to `__stack_smash_handler' preloader.o: In

Because of a Fedora bug in libtool[1], some libguestfs tarballs that I built contain a hard-coded path to a 'redhat-hardened-ld' linker script inside libtool. You will find that on non-Fedora/RHEL/CentOS platforms, the build will fail with an error similar to this: gcc: error: /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld: No such file or directory The affected tarballs are:

Hi, I'm running a few PHP-based apps on our server (PMB, SPIP, Joomla, PHPMyAdmin), and I'm not always comforted about security. I don't know the details, but many a security expert frowns when it comes to PHP. Now I just stumbled over this: http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin.127.html Has anyone already tried this out? An opinion about it? Is it worth it? Since I have to

Hi, Microsoft some time ago introduced Hardened UNC Paths, and in April published the Badlock security fixes, which seem to be related to that. Samba at the same time published versions 4.4.1 (and 4.4.2). Even after reading the release notes of Samba 4.4.1 several times, I still do not know whether I must manually adjust smb.conf to be protected from these vulnerabilities. What I do know is

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > In the rgdal package, configure.ac has had : ${LDFLAGS=`"${RBIN}" CMD > config LDFLAGS`} at least since 2012, so picking up LDFLAGS known to the R > version installed. Very recently, users installing rgdal from source with > R installed from RPM are seeing problems, such as those reported

Hi list, Is there suhosin patched php 5.2+ available for centos 6? -- Eero

Thanks! Setting spnego = yes worked perfectly! > We're running Fedora Core and Samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and we're authenticating > our Windows XP users against Active Directory running on Windows 2003. > Everything works fine! > > But now we're trying to secure and harden our WinXP machines and now when > any user logged into a secured WinXP they get the errormessage

I've been working with Asterisk for about 2 months now and am doing well. However I decided to switch platforms from Fedora Core 1, that my predacessor was using, to Gentoo, for obvious reasons. It just seems faster and less "bloated" everything I need, nothing I don't. Anyways, I've read what the Wiki had to say about it and I was only confused on one thing, putting

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:24, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Roger Bivand <Roger.Bivand at nhh.no> wrote: > > > > In the rgdal package, configure.ac has had : ${LDFLAGS=`"${RBIN}" CMD > > config LDFLAGS`} at least since 2012, so picking up LDFLAGS known to the R > > version installed. Very

In the rgdal package, configure.ac has had : ${LDFLAGS=`"${RBIN}" CMD config LDFLAGS`} at least since 2012, so picking up LDFLAGS known to the R version installed. Very recently, users installing rgdal from source with R installed from RPM are seeing problems, such as those reported in this thread: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-geo/2020-June/028251.html The diagnosis by

We're running Fedora Core and Samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3 and we're authenticating our Windows XP users against Active Directory running on Windows 2003. Everything works fine! But now we're trying to secure and harden our WinXP machines and now when any user logged into a secured WinXP they get the errormessage "The account is not authorized to log in from this station". I browsed