similar to: Command-line dialer/recorder for asterisk?

For efficiency & reliability, when SIP transmits DTMF as non-audio data, it uses RFC2833 or INFO. My question is - (not knowing much about IAX2) - when IAX2 transmits DTMF as non-audio data - is it also using RFC2833 and/or INFO, or it it using some other IAX2-specific mechanism with its own name? Thank you, Brent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

I am not sure if this is the place for Digium user-to-user discussion, but... We have deployed many (20+) IAXy's in the field. At a couple of locations, the IAXy's have just stopped working after 1 or 2 days use. No lights go on, no DHCP lease is renewed as far as we can tell, and of course no dialtone and no registration with the server. Has anyone else experienced high failure rate

We have an application which is primarily DTMF driven (automated on both sides), which we are trying to deploy over VOIP and Asterisk (using some Sipuras and some IAXY's). We are finding that in around half the cases, the Asterisk server can't decode the DTMF digits from the field office (or at least some of them). Though, when we place voice calls for testing, we can hear eachother quite

We have an Asterisk server online, with many SIP clients (some Sipuras, some laptops), and we're also using some IAXy's. I've been trying to find a simple way to check "who's online", meaning who is reachable at the moment, without actually going through and dialing everybody. Is there a way to do this with Asterisk? I am sorry if I'm missing something obvious, but I

I am having trouble with a DTMF-based application on Asterisk 1.0.3. Specifically, when two IAX2-based devices are talking, when they send DTMF to eachother, the other side only hears clicks, and maybe a millisecond of DTMF tone, but not any real duration. Furthermore, when one IAXy device calls the Echo test program, we can hear our echo, but when we punch DTMF in, we get the same effect

Hi, I'm looking for a multi-line sip/ip phone that can answer multiple incoming paths. IE a secretary sits at a front desk and can answer multiple incoming lines/DID's. Is there something like this? Thanks, Brent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041202/5b685d69/attachment.htm

Good day Guys I forgot to add and mention a very important piece of the puzzle. We are making use of dovecots compression plugin. I.e. https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/zlib_plugin/#compression Regards Brent Clark On 2019/11/11 14:49, Brent Clark wrote: > Good day Aki > > Thanks ever so much for replying. > > Interesting that you ask the version of dovecot. Any

Hi Brent, You're correct. The segmented stack model is intended for performance, not security. Its goal is to allow lightweight threads to be very cheaply allocated and destroyed. For your model, you would most likely want to use different address spaces for the different memory types. Currently, clang does not allow you to define the address space of variables with automatic storage

What version are you running? Aki On 11.11.2019 12.26, Brent Clark via dovecot wrote: > Good day Guys > > Just an update, my colleague and I came across this script. > > https://www.dovecot.org/tools/maildir-size-fix.pl > > We made a backup, ran it, but unfortunately the problem still persists. > > Regards > Brent > > On 2019/11/11 11:42, Brent Clark wrote:

Hi Duncan, It doesn't appear to be what I'm looking for as there is copying of the old stack to the new stack. Additionally, according to the LLVM docs on segmented stacks (http://llvm.org/releases/3.0/docs/SegmentedStacks.html) the stacklings are allocated memory from the heap. Since this places them all on the same memory segment, a read/write from one stackling could technically

Hi Brent, On 03/06/13 14:32, Brent Gregory Roth wrote: > Hi Duncan, > > Are the segmented stacks actually on separate memory segments? My intended > purpose for placing different datatypes on separate stacks is such that memory > accesses to one datatype won't be allowed to overflow to another datatype. > > If they aren't, in fact, on separate memory segments, are you

Hello, I've been lurking around the mailing list and browsing around on Asterisk-related links while I wait for my X100P to come in the mail. So far I haven't found very much information related to what I want to do with Asterisk. I was wondering if someone could point me in the direction of any work that may already have been done on a project similar to the one I'm trying to

Hi Duncan, Are the segmented stacks actually on separate memory segments? My intended purpose for placing different datatypes on separate stacks is such that memory accesses to one datatype won't be allowed to overflow to another datatype. If they aren't, in fact, on separate memory segments, are you aware of a way to place a non-readable/-writable segment in between two other stack

So any other ideas as to why my custom class under app/models is being cached even though all the caching is set to false in the config/environments/* files? Currently I''m having to restart WEBrick after EVERY change to the file. The controllers and views are reloading just fine and not being cached. It''s just the custom class I created that''s being cached. Any ideas

Can someone who is knowledgable in the traditional telco space please give me a layman's explanation (or point me to an appropriate url) of LBO as per the zaptel configuration file? # The line build-out (or LBO) is an integer, from the following table: # 0: 0 db (CSU) / 0-133 feet (DSX-1) # 1: 133-266 feet (DSX-1) # 2: 266-399 feet (DSX-1) # 3: 399-533 feet (DSX-1) # 4: 533-655 feet (DSX-1)

Sorry if this comes through twice. I already sent this once, before joining the mailing list. I''m attempting to use Backgroundrb to handle asynchronous pdf creation, but in doing so, I''ve run into a very strange problem. Below is a method that''s called from the controller which creates a new worker, then grabs the worker and calls the ''build_pdf''

Well, I thought I had the problem solved. Ported everything over to PJSip and build RDNS records for the phones and the server, but I am still experiencing the problem on incoming calls. ** On 6/7/2016 1:00 PM, Faheem Muhammad wrote: > I've faced the same issue. The issue was related to DNS, the reverse > lookup query failure caused the delay around(7-9 seconds). The purpose >

I have no clue, I didn't have time to look into that example yet. How does the IR (before optimization) differ from the other version? Roel On 01/24/2012 04:45 PM, Brent Walker wrote: > Can you explain please why it works for this version of the function: > > double f(double *__restrict__ x, double *__restrict__ y, double > *__restrict__ z); > > What is different here?

Folks, I recently obtained a Western Electric multi-line phone and am seeking help with getting this beast working with *. The interesting stuff in my * implementation consists of a T100P card, a TDM400P card, and an Adtran TA750 channel bank with three quad-port FXS modules and a quad-port FXO. The TA750 is wired to a 24-port Cat 5 patch panel via a 25-pair Amp cable. The phone is a model

Hi I have used fa() to perform a factor analysis of a psychological battery which is thought to have 11 factors. I can identify which factors the loadings relate to easily enough because I can see which items are loading onto each of the columns in the $loading output. However, how can I identify which items or loadings are being used to create each of the columns in the $scores output? I have