similar to: Premature DRQ

While writing a file to an ext3 filesystem, i get some drive errors on the console. I guess is a drive/ide related problem more that a ext3 one, but anyway the debug output is here if you want to take a look. And, by the way, what means that DRQ thing?? Oct 7 20:31:36 fargo kernel: (journal.c, 218): kjournald: kjournald wakes Oct 7 20:31:36 fargo kernel: (journal.c, 202): kjournald:

I upgraded my Centos 4.7 server last night. Switched from a cheaper 50$ asus motherboard to a Supermicro motherboard. I also, using dd, copied entire 500g SATA seagate drive to new 500g SATA seagate drive so as to have two copies in case something went wrong. Anyway, now I keep getting this error: Nov 21 06:08:33 server kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } Nov 21 06:08:33 server

I have 3 OQOs with Centos and I frequently get the following error messages: Jan 28 13:18:07 oqo3 kernel: hdc: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } Jan 28 13:18:07 oqo3 kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown Jan 28 13:18:07 oqo3 kernel: hdc: no DRQ after issuing MULTWRITE Jan 28 13:18:07 oqo3 kernel: ide1: reset: success I have Fedora 10 on a fourth unit and it NEVER gets this message. I

I've read the wiki and other resources on how to connect Vonage / Voicepulse and all these other services to Asterisk... We are attempting a connection to a Lucent iMerge. Lucent has told us that it won't work - but we feel confident that it will. Has anyone worked with the Lucent iMerge - or would be willing to help lend a hand? It is capable of H323 / MGCP. Even if I could make the

Having fought my PXE config and eventually getting it to work (had to comment out the group { } statments ? I now come across another issue I cannot resolve and would appreciate some help. in my /tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/default file I have cause to use the APPEND statement to pass options to the kernel being used. Unfortunately this line has now become longer than 255 characters and appears to be

> -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 7:11 AM > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: Robinson, Paul; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories? > > On 25 July 2016 at 14:55, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> > wrote: > > I know of a way

On 19 Oct 2015, at 19:05, Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I find the git imerge script extremely useful for this kind of situation. > > https://github.com/mhagger/git-imerge > > Logically, it does something similar to rebasing your local branch onto EVERY commit in the upstream branch, in turn, until it finds conflicts. There is

I'm trying to connect an asterisk server via oh323 to a Lucent iMerge. I patched the code due so that Lucent can handle asterisk's ver4 h323 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Lucent+iMerge+Configuration I can now successfully dial in to our company over multiple lines. The issue is when I dial out The first outgoing call connects to an outside user A The second call drops the first

Have you tried the git-imerge add-on? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMZ2_-Ny_zc On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > David > > A. Greene via llvm-dev > > Sent: Thursday, June 02,

Hi, all. I feel like we've strayed pretty far from the question originally posed in this thread. One of the pieces of feedback I got before I started this thread was that many people felt that, the last time the question of multiple repos vs. monorepo was discussed, it was interspersed with other topics, making it difficult for some people to weigh in appropriately (or even to be aware that

Take mercy on me - I'm a newbie w/ Asterisks... Here's what I'm trying to do - and please someone let me know if this can be done... We have a commercial VoIP network (we are a communications carrier)... The gatekeeper (Lucent iMerge) supports MGCP/H.323 and allows for calls to be made to the PSTN cloud via GR303 links. I would like to build Asterisks with H323 (or MGCP if need be -

Not sure if anyone has played with one of these gems - ToneCommander 7210 -- but they do ISDN over H323 - and seem to be proprietary to Lucent / AG iMerge. I'm trying to find a way to reverse engineer it to work on a standard asterisk setup... The first thing I found with a tcpdump / ethereal is it's trying to communicate udp on 1719.. I assume that I need to run maybe something like

PXELinux from a DHCP server - read the docs - couldnt be simpler. I'm afraid its beaten me, no matter what I do I always get the same result at the client side "PXE-E53: No boot file found" For the life of me I cannot see what I'm doing wrong and would appreciate any assistance in trying to diag. RedHat 7.3 - (I know its old but I have to accomodate other dependancies) dhcp

Hi, I'm trying to interconnect sip and h323 endpoints using asterisk and asterisk crashes with segmentation fault whenever h323 connection needs to be established. It registers with gatekeeper ok though. Here are the symptoms. If the call initiated by SIP device, asterisk replies to it "Trying" and then silently crashes (it launched as asterisk -vvvvcd). In debug log I can see the

I want to replace a custom PBX, that is infront on a IVR system based on OLD NMS AG-E1 Card. The Cards is configurated with CAS Digitalmode, someone can give me some info about Digim Cards CAS configuration i need a conversion Table? I wanto to don't touch configuration on winbox, i want only replace HWPBX box with asterisk. Diagram Telco E1 ===>Proprietary PBX========(CAS)===>IVR

Hi all, I have some problems with my gvinum setup after the system panic'ed. Afterwards the system fails finding the plexes to the subdisks (or at least that is what I can understand after having searched the gvinum source code for the error string in the DMESG log..) The machine is an IBM Netfinity 5000 and the internal HW self tests does not find any errors in the hw. Luckily my root is

On 08/23/2017 12:44 PM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 23 Aug 2017, at 18:21, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On 08/23/2017 12:06 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev wrote: >>> On 8/23/2017 11:58 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: >>>> If we want to go down that route, I can certainly imagine a feasible

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On October 31st, FreeBSD 5.3 and FreeBSD 5.4 will have reached their End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Users of either of those FreeBSD releases are strongly encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 5.5 or FreeBSD 6.1 before that date. In addition, the FreeBSD 6.0 End of Life is presently scheduled

Mike Edwards and I will be hosting a talk/BOF called "Living Downstream Without Drowning" which is for anyone maintaining a bunch of local changes to Clang/LLVM/etc. We will present some procedures and tactics we've evolved at Sony, including patch tactics for reducing merge pain, and how we are throwing automation at the problem. But we are really curious what YOU have done

We have a new machine here that we are trying to use for CentOS as a base for our primary application. Although I do not have direct access to the physical machine, I have begun looking into it remotely (via ssh) to see why we are getting the following errors periodically: /var/log/messages.1-Nov 1 18:19:00 Centos5 kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } /var/log/messages.1:Nov 1