similar to: Testing RESTful routes

Trying the next release of rspec, I have had to make changes in the existing specs for routing. I have written an script with sed that makes this automatically (two files) spec/upgrade.sed ================ /route_for/s/id => 1/id => "1"/g /route_for.*create/s/== \(["''].*["'']\)/== {:path => \1, :method => :post}/ /route_for.*update/s/==

I am having a heck of a time understanding the new rest craze in rails. what I think I understand so far: 1 rest is about the way we use http to access information on the internet. 2 http was created with nouns and verbs in mind, but the only verbs that are supported in browsers and server software today are ''post'' and ''get''. Other useful verbs include put

Hi, I got the resource "Llamadas" nested in: - Operadores - Productos - Centros Here is part of my routes http://pastie.caboo.se/92767 I want to spec that the routes for Llamadas, I tried several approachs: - route_for(:controller => "llamadas", :action => "exitosas", :operador_id => 1).should == "/operador/1/llamadas;exitosas" -

I can''t figure out how to make the updates to allow for the route_form method to return a url that matches the expected. Here is a sample route_for(:controller => :task, :action => :new).should == "/task/new" If a task has to be created for a user, how exactly do I do this. The following doesn''t work: route_for(:controller => :task, :action => :new,

Is there some reason that the rspec resource generator produces code like this: context "Routes for the AnimalsController should map" do controller_name :animals specify "{ :controller => ''animals'', :action => ''index'' } to / animals" do route_for(:controller => "animals", :action =>

I''ve written a story and I run into a snag. I''ve written the create_forum method and told it to set the id to 1 but when it creates the forum the id is autoincremented. My forums table is empty but the id keeps incrementing the newest record on creation. When I run the story it comes out as something like 59 which fails my story because I''m asking it to look at /forums/1

I''ve been looking into RESTful approaches lately. Everything I know my dog, Lelu, taught me. REST (REpresentational State Transfer) is an architectural technique for networked applications first described by Roy Fielding in his dissertation at UC Irvine-- excellent work, especially considering the tempting proximity of Newport Beach. As Lelu described it to me, REST strives

Hi, When upgrading to rspec/rspec-rails 1.2.6 gem (from 1.1.12), I''m having a new problem verifying routes that should not exist. This is to support something like this in routes.rb: map.resources :orders do |orders| orders.resources :items, :except => [:index,:show] end I used to use lambda {}.should_raise( routing error ), but it stopped detecting any raised error.

Hello, all, I have this error with my rspec - controller - test, and yes, I do found the thread with the same error here, but it isn''t helped me, think it''s not my case. i have rails -v = Rails 3.0.0.rc, rspec -v = 2.0.0.beta.18 (hope they should match each other). my test is here: spec/controllers/posts_controller_spec.rb and i ran it with command: rspec

Hey everyone, I have a philosophical question here. Say I have a website that uses two models for accounts: Person and Company. Normally I would just have /accounts/new for user signup. However, the RESTful way to do it is to have /people and /companies. Unfortunately, this doesn''t account for a situation where you''d have a one-page signup form. I wouldn''t want

Hi List, I''m trying to get my grip on the restful methods that are now part of edge rails. Making the first steps was impressive as well as easy because there are already great resources on the blogs of early adopters: http://www.ryandaigle.com/articles/2006/08/01/whats-new-in-edge-rails-simply-restful-support-and-how-to-use-itand

Hello all, I have a spec for a route that used to pass under Rails 2.2.2 and rspec 1.1.12, but can?t figure out what is wrong since I updated. Here is the assertion: route_for( { :controller => ''purchase_orders'', :action => ''update'', :company_id => "32", :id

--- autoconf/configure.ac | 4 +++- cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake.in | 3 ++- configure | 4 +++- tools/llvm-config/Makefile | 6 ++++++ tools/llvm-config/llvm-config.in.in | 3 ++- 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/autoconf/configure.ac b/autoconf/configure.ac index f3e94e8..cd943cc 100644 ---

Why? -eric On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Johannes Obermayr wrote: > --- > autoconf/configure.ac | 4 +++- > cmake/modules/LLVMConfig.cmake.in | 3 ++- > configure | 4 +++- > tools/llvm-config/Makefile | 6 ++++++ > tools/llvm-config/llvm-config.in.in | 3 ++- > 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

If you're on the new Makefile system, you will want to update your Makefile.rules. The patch below provides some important fixes for parallel builds and dependencies. It also adds some new features like the -local targets. For example, you can now build "all-local" to build the local directory without recursing into subdirectories. See the comments below for details of the change.

Hi, Apologies if this has been answered before. I have just started to try out the new RESTful routes. For resources that aren''t related to anything else, everything makes sense - for resources with relationships, I am less certain of what the "right" thing to do - especially in relation to the urls produced, and how to modify those urls. For example, if I have teams and

Good summer, all! This patch enables ENABLE_SHARED=1 to build DLL based LLVM toolchain. I have checked this on Cygwin-1.5, Cygwin-1.7, mingw(msysgit) and mingw-cross-fedora12. I can separate this patch into some parts; cleanups, adding definitions and adding rules. Any feedbacks are welcome. Have fun! ...Takumi * Pros - reduction of linking time of toolchain. - capability of -load

Once again, here''s something I haven''t figured out. Apologies if this is too newb-ish, but, how do I spec my routes using RSpec-Rails? In particular, I''ve got a catch-all route that needs to catch a wide variety of URLs: map.document ''*url'', :controller => ''documents'', :action => ''show'' Is there a way to

Hi all I use Sweave extensively to mix R and LaTeX, and often have R code appearing in my LaTeX document. Just a quick question then: What is the best way to add example of R commands into LaTeX in-line? (That is, not using Sweave.) For example, suppose I wish to place in my document this instruction: ...is done in R using the command \verb|lm( y ~ var.one + var.two )| as follows: I

Surprisingly this invalid latex syntax is still formatted "right" in the html output. On a closer look it seems like roxygen2 introduces those, when using markdown backtick quoting, if the quoted content is not syntactic. For instance: #' `c(c(1)` #' `c(c(1))` Will convert the first line to `\verb{c(c(1)}` and the second to `\code{c(c(1))}`. I've opened a ticket there FYI: