similar to: IAX2 tolerance on packet losses

Greetings, I would like to calculate tolerancelimits for a series of predicted values from nonlinear regression models. I've been using the tolerance package but the self-starting functions are not in the derivitive tables. When I spellout the functions and supply starting values I repeatedly get an error message regardless of the starting values I use (see output below). Does anyone

Some more info: Just tried this on a server without using any NAT and no port forwarding, no masquerading, and I still have the same problem. So there goes that idea. I do not know what this VNAK error means. By the way, I am using the latest version (1.2.6) of asterisk, have also tried other versions with the same problem [1.0.9 (Ubuntu Breezy) and 1.0.7 (Debian Sarge) and 1.2.1 (Ubuntu

Howdy, I recently saw something strange with a call between *'s over IAX2. There are actually 3 *'s involved. The setup is like this: SIP phone ------(ulaw over LAN)------ *1 -------- IAX2 (ulaw over Internet) ---------*2--------(GSM over Internet) -----------*3--------(ulaw over LAN)------ SIP phone Now what is shown below is the Asterisk in the middle, that is doing the

Can anyone tell me why I keep getting these messages from IAXTEL? It does appear to register since I get lines like this: 2005-04-30 04:26:42 VERBOSE[1644]: -- Registered to '69.73.19.178', who sees us as 67.182.152.242:4569 But what is this? I don't think IAXTEL is working for me, since I can't dial 800 #s through it when I copy the iaxtel.com instructions. 2005-05-20

I was wondering if anyone had seen this problem before and/or could offer any insight into what the trouble might be: I have an Asterisk machine that it set up as a mutual friend with another one (in another state... about 150ms away). Calls between the two fail to get established approximately 50% of the time. When a call works, everything is fine. When one fails, however, I see a large

Hi, I use a simple scheme: SIP video phone A (h264/Asterisk 1.8.11) <---IAX2 trunk----> SIP video phone B (h264/Asterisk 11.7.0) When calls from A to B and vice versa drop on pickup. On B side: [Oct 24 16:33:49] DEBUG[15590][C-00000012] res_rtp_asterisk.c: Setting the marker bit due to a source update [Oct 24 16:33:49] DEBUG[15590][C-00000012] res_rtp_asterisk.c: Setting the marker bit

Hi all, We want to do some stress testing of firewall configurations/hardware. We have discovered hping that seems a great tool for this, but funny enough Shorewall cuts it !!! even when you leave ports open :) So besides hping, any tool for this? Why is shorewall cutting this traffic? Thanks in advance. Regards. -- Jaime Nebrera - jnebrera@eneotecnologia.com Consultor TI - ENEO

Hi Chaps, Is there a way to detect/highlight poor quality voice calls going through an asterisk server? Was thinking of picking up a cdr record or some other variable showing poor quality on calls when the internet is having issues. Is there any qos or poor audio quality variables available? Cheers, Taff. ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Answers - Got

Hi, I have a 1.2.4 asterisk box at a remote location, which is using IAX2 to connect to a 1.2.5 box for PSTN. There are 15 users on the remote server, all connecting via SIP softphones. For some reason, there is an increasing number of calls where the callee does not get any audio although the caller can hear them perfectly. This happens between 5% and 10% of the time. If they hang up and call

Hi, I have been doing some tests using hping2 and TCP SYN pings targeting local and remote hosts from two FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p10 and one Linux 2.4.18 host. The three machines have the same hardware configuration and have been running for 6 months now. The average load isnt too high (usually 0.01 to 0.15) on the FreeBSD machines. Here is the output from hping2 (excuse me the line wrap),

The following patch allows the network tests to pass with hvm support enabled. More specifically: 02_network_local_ping_pos.py REASON: ping loopback failed for size 65507. ping eth0 failed for size 65507. (but all other size pings work) 05_network_dom0_ping_pos.py REASON: Ping to dom0 failed for size 65507. (but all other size pings work) 11_network_domU_ping_pos.py passes 100% (even the large

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: UDP stream DNAT problem Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870 Summary: Iptables cannot block outbound packets sent by Nessus Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

Greetings, I am running into *possible* Samba/Firewall issues. Our Samba v3.0.11 server is also running iptables. In our log.nmbd file we have noticed the following: [2005/09/27 15:43:41, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_connect(1313) Error connecting to 130.xx.xx.xx (Connection refused) [2005/09/27 15:50:21, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(790) Packet send failed to 130.xx.xx.xx(138) ERRNO=Operation

Hi! I''m studying load balancing and fault tolerance using multiple WAN interfaces. I follow the howto in http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt but the problem is that faults detected are limited only in link between lan gateway and modem/router adsl, and none about adsl signal. Someone can tell me another howto about fault tolerance using a different method? (that solve my problem) I know

In my previous experience with wmtsa function wavCWTPeaks I realized the Tolerance vector passed to the multi-scale decomposition function "wavCWTTree" is crucial for detecting the time series extrema and prevent the R script from aborting. By trial & error I recently managed to figure out the Tolerance vector values in a single case (please see attachments). I am looking for some

Is anyone aware of R code for calculating sample size in the context of tolerance intervals? Thanks, Keith [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Sooner or later, the same The teacher to the student in his class at the effects of collective speak, told a story. The story is: a sheep, and leave the sheep eaten by the Wolf. Finish the story, the teacher asked: "the classmates, if this sheep honestly stay in the flock, it won't be the wolves eat, isn't it?" A little boy stood up and replied, "of course. But, it is

Greetings list, Quite a few of our users seem to be experiencing poor voice quality when they're using internet connections over which we have little or no control (i.e. they're using their own router with no QoS, etc.). Some of these connections are giving a qualify time within asterisk of 130ms+. Are there any recommendations as to phones with particularly good buffering that might

Hello CentOS, I'm seeing this in the logwatch output. Anything I find on the net hasn't been definitive. The system is an x-less server. --------------------- Kernel Begin ------------------------ WARNING: Kernel Errors Present vesafb: probe of vesafb0 failed with error -6...: 6 Time(s) ---------------------- Kernel End ------------------------- -- Best regards, Mickael