similar to: How to DRY up controller action spec with different params.

I''m doing a redirect in one of my controller actions and somehow I can''t spec it, see this pastie: http://pastie.caboo.se/53120. When following the link from a browser I''m being redirected to the right page. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I wanted to use ARTS to add RJS in a behaviour driven way to my application, but I''m having some trouble asserting a replace_html with a partial. I''ve created a pastie (http://pastie.caboo.se/60694) which contains the RJS I want to spec, the spec which I already wrote and its failure message. I''m currently using RSpec-0.9.2

This might seem really simple to some but just wanted to ask: what is the difference between @session[''user''] and session[:user] ? and how would you use each? And another question, I have the following code: def get_customer if @session[''customer''] @c = Customer.find(@session[''customer'']) end end private def

This issue has been discussed before (http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/ 125392) and after spending a while debugging through this, I still don''t have a solution. Lets try again? I have two controllers, SomeController and Admin::SomeController. When SomeController is loaded first (which happens under spork, found out by editing ActiveSupport::AbstractController) I get warning: toplevel

Hi, I''ll appreciate insight on this one... it''s causing me some pain on my production env. <%= link_to "something", :controller => "somecontroller", :action => ''someaction'', :id => someid, :favorite => is_a_favorite %> I added a boolean :favorite to the URL arguments. THis has always worked well under my dev

*assigns* - _Any objects that are stored as instance variables in actions for use in views._ (http://guides.rubyonrails.org/testing.html#the-four-hashes-of-the-apocalypse) I have a code :- test "should update line_item" do patch :update, id:@line_item, line_item: { cart_id:@line_item.cart_id, product_id:@line_item.product_id} assert_redirected_to

line_items.yml: one: product_id: 1 cart_id: 1 quantity: 1 carts.yml: one: {} product.rb: has_many :line_items cart.rb: has_many :line_items, dependent: :destroy line_item.rb: belongs_to :product belongs_to :cart line_item_controller.rb: def destroy @line_item = LineItem.find(params[:id]) @cart = @line_item.cart @line_item.destroy respond_to do |format| format.html

Any ideas on why this is? The quantity field in mysql is INT, but I get back a string? This is preventing me from using the increment method. >> @cart = Cart.new => #<Cart:0x2730f40 @new_record=true, @attributes={}> >> @cart.items << Item.find(:first) => [#<Item:0x272d6ec @attributes={"vendor_id"=>"1",

Code sample: class SomeController < ApplicationController before_filter do |c| add_crumb "Blah", "/blah" #breadcrumbs plugin redirect_to :controller => "foo", :action => "bar" unless c.send (:has_package?) end # Rest of the controller... private def has_package? # A bunch of logic work to check to make sure # somebody''s session contains

Why can''t I use the RESTful route helpers in my specs? In my controller I''m doing a redirect: redirect_to list_path(:id => @item.list_id) Now when I write: controller.should_redirect_to list_path(:id => 2) I''m getting the following error: NoMethodError in ''POST on /lists/2/items should redirect to index on succesful POST'' You have a nil object

Working on Rails Engine. I want to make the controllers customizable whereever the Rails Engine is used. Therefore, I was trying to use `extend ActiveSupport::Concern` on the Engine controller class and include it in MyRailsApp. https://gist.github.com/4185823 # code in my rails engine moduel MyEngine class SomeController extend ActiveSupport::Concern def engine_some_method

Behind every great release is a maintenance release. Go get it while it''s hot. We''ve also reworked the website a little - trying to scare off fewer people. Aslak

Hello! I''m pretty new to unit testing, and have only been using RSpec for a few weeks. I found that for my controller specs, my setup methods were getting very long building mocks/stubs for all the model objects I needed to work with. I''ve started creating helpers like the following for each of my models. The "min_" methods are short for "minimum", and

I''m building a users web service (direct dispatching) that will (I hope) allow several other applications to manage the same pool of users. Plus it will act as a single-sign-on solution for what I''m doing. But I''m having difficulty accessing the UserAPI. Here''s what I''ve done so far: $> rails usermanagement - "usermanagement" is the

Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 5:07 schrieb Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>: > On 04.08.2016 13:59, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >> >> >> Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 1:38 schrieb Michal Privoznik >> <mprivozn@redhat.com>: >>> On 04.08.2016 12:12, Jonatan Schlag wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am Do, 4. Aug, 2016 um 11:32

On 04.08.2016 20:28, Jonatan Schlag wrote: > > >> Then the other option that comes to my mind is a race with somebody else >> on the system. You can attach gdb to the daemon and set breakpoint to >> virSecurityDACSetOwnershipInternal(). In the arguments you should see >> the path eventually among with uid:gid. >> >> BTW: what's the domain XML? >

I have run into the EXACT problem; I also may have the solution; I wish I could give you a technical describtion, but I can't. All I know is what worked. Go into Services in the administrative panel of Windows XP and set any service relating to nVidia to Manual startup instead of Automatic. This does not interfere in anyway with any of nVidia's functions in my experince. You can also

Hey Has anybody dealt with any of these products? They Seem to be at a good price point. but I've never used one so I was hopeing that sombody here Might have some insight. Their configurations are as follows. ACOM200B: 2 Port FXS ACOM200D: 2 Port FXO ACOM200E: 1 FXO and 1 FXS This looks to me that this product would be a better solution then the linejack would be. and according to this

Hi, I''ve done AJAX calls to Rails'' Controllers before yet never required to generate a response back to the view. In this respect, I have tried to keep it moronically simple and just add a node to see that it works, yet the response doesn''t come through / isn''t interpreted as it should. Long story short, code : // Have to use Mootools to integrate a

I''m heading out of town, but had a quick thought I wanted to share. Rather then using ambiguous named request helpers in controller specs like "do_request", I''ve been using more readable helpers like "post_create". For example... describe ProjectController do def post_create post :create, ... end before do end it "creates a new