similar to: gateways failover with asterisk

Hello r helpers! Below is the whole coding for my programme. Before proceed more further, let me explain for you. First of all, I need to compute trimmed mean. Till that step is ok. Then I need to compute ssdw which is sum of square deviation. If I do equal trimming at both tail of distribution that I chose, I will use the first ssd formulae which is "a". But if I am doing unequal

Hi Who concern, I setup TINC VPN follow these. 192.168.1.x / 24 (Client groups) | 192.168.1.1 (eth1) (GW1) 202.44.34.206 (eth0) || Internet || 202.44.45.14 (eth0) (GW2) 192.168.2.1 (eth1)

Hello all. I am not 100% familiar with the Linux advanced routing capbalieties yet, so I thought , after reading source code, documentation and more that I might be better off asking the experts on this list. I am not using this ina production environment, but at home, as a test case. First of all, here is the network topology. Internal LAN <--> Switch <--> [NAT/FIREWALL/INTERNAL LAN

Hello, I have configured a load balancing router using Julian''s patches and as described in "nano.txt" for two ISP links as shown below. ISP 1 ISP 2 . . | | | | | | | WAN

Hi, I''ve setup a gateway using multiple default gateways and netfilter MASQUERADE to load balance traffic between two DSL interfaces and one dedicated link, and when I try to download something big, or when I''m using MSN (both in clients under this gateway), sometimes, or most times, after a while the connection timeouts. The connection doesn''t seem to change its

I am relatively new to iproute2. Any information on the topic below would save me considerable time. I appreciate any help, thanks. We want to plug two lines into a webserver to increase the bandwidth available to the hosted sites. Rather than use round-robin DNS we would prefer to use iproute2 to use equal cost routing across the two lines. However, I am still not sure how well that will

Hello all! I applied http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/routes-2.6.8-10.diff patch to kernel 2.6.8.1 and it works fine, or almost fine. It does the load balancing well, but when one link is dropped it continues to try it. At the end of http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt it is said to ping gateway 1 and gateway 2, for the kernel to know if that route is working, but since my linux is connected to the links

Hi, I have a linux box loaded with RH7.1, 3 ethernet with load balance on 2 ISP. In theory, if one router stop to work (I have turn off for this try), the Dead Gateway Detection, would re-instradate alla traffic on other link. This not work...someone have more experience on this? Giorgio Biondi

Hello, I have a problem with the following setup, I hope you can help me. I have two internet gateways, one for LAN1 and the second for LAN2. +--------------+ GW1 more eth0| |eth4(SNAT) GW2 ---...routers...-----+ router +----------------- | | +---+------+---+ eth1|

How do I allow traceroute to reach my server? Pings work fine but traceroute stops at the last hop before my server. If I shut off the firewall it reaches it fine. PING danicar.net (24.222.246.120): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=0 ttl=237 time=104.0 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=237 time=74.9 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=237 time=90.6

Hello, I''m having a very strange problem concerning traceroute and routing and didn''t know if lartc or netfilter would be the correct choice for asking. (so sorry if my question is misplaced) I have the following setup: public ip -- gw1 -- 172.16.0.1 --- 172.16.0.2/and public ip''s --- gw2 --- switch --users (public and private ip addresses; ip-user-pub) from the

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

Hi guys, I have a mail server running qmail with two network interfaces. All packages comes from the first one and I want to mark outgoing packages to route them using the second interface (ADSL). I have write this script, but it ins''t work. All packages are returning by the first interface... :-( x-x-x # Tables, networks, interfaces, addresses and gateways IF1=eth0 T1=100

Hello there. I am setting up a router using openwrt. Part of the project is load balancing among 2 broadband lines. I made use of the line: ip route add default scope global \ nexthop {GW1} dev {IF1} weight 1 \ nexthop {GW2} dev {IF2} weight 1 somewhere on the configs. On the test phase, automatically switching (routing) to line GW2 when line GW1 is suddenly disconnected takes a long time.

Hello, So installed Fedora15. No problem, wish it had regular menus but the steamline effect isn't totally terrible. Heard that Guild Wars1 is playable in linux and so installed wine. It seems that you aren't supposed to install as root so I removed it as root. I then try to install anything via yum as non-root and I get the error of needing to be root. So, I read that you can bypass this

Hi guys, I have a question about of route-map with linux, I have two routers linux, one for Internet Trafic and other for VPN traffic, both routers have public IP''s address. Internet with nat VPN with nat eth0 200.244.10.1 eth0 200.244.10.2 ---- ----

I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I

I am have a shorewall firewall and freeswan ipsec running on a redhat 8.0 Linux gateway machine. I have one working tunnel defined, all works well. I am not clear how to define mutiple concurrent tunnels. I can not add further interface entries as all the tunnels come in on ipsec0, do I still have mutiple zone definitions? some of the tunnels will be dynamic roadwarriors and as such would need a

I have a working Asterisk 13.1.0 running, and I am trying to configure a SIP trunk for outbound and inbound calling, and a DID for the Asterisk server, which is used for incoming calls from PSTN. I configured my SIP.US trunks (showing one gateway, gw1, here for brevity, have two: gw1 & gw2, which are both configured on my end): [sonnyGW1] type=registration transport=transport-udp

Thanks for the help, James! its finally working!