similar to: Re: Reboots -- lsof and SIGHUP, a combination to know ...

The "2005 Readers' Choice Awards" voting is in progress at Linux Journal, and CentOS is Nominated in the "distribution:" category. So ... all you guys and gals who think CentOS is the best thing ever, get over to: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8266 and vote for CentOS :) ------------------------------- Also, since write ins are allowed on the e-mailed ballot, if

From: Simon Perreault <nomis80 at lqt.ca> > Isn't it acceptable for Red Hat to sell SLAs on a per-computer basis? > I really don't get where you're going. The main problem people have in understanding RHEL is that they don't understand it is a subscription with guarantees and, optionally, service level agreements (SLAs). It's _not_ a product at all. Red Hat has

From: Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos at br-online.de> > If you can read binary :) > The script section of the glibc RPM is a very simple one: > [angenenr at shutdown dict]$rpm -q --scripts glibc > postinstall program: /usr/sbin/glibc_post_upgrade.i686 > postuninstall program: /sbin/ldconfig > And I cannot find Documentation for glibc_post_upgrade at the moment, a >

Hello, I heard recently about the detect-renamed patch for rsync. I was about to code something similar, I need it badly, but decided to give the patch a try first. It seems to work well but it's rename detection scheme seems to be limited. From my tests, it seems to detect that a file has changed name only if the file remains in the same base dir. It detects that a file has moved

On 12/15/2015 08:51 AM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > The change was made years ago. From the lack of screaming, you can > tell that rpm is being reasonably clever about it. I can find no evidence that rpm does anything of the sort. httpd restarts on upgrade because its maintainers included a command to do so in the %posttrans scriptlet. > Apache, for example, checks its config syntax before

I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 When issueing the command $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ .obj/conf.o .obj/configwriter.o \ -L/usr/share/qt3/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib \ -lcrypto -lusb -lutil -lqt-mt -lXext -lX11 -lm -lpthread I get this output: Linking bitcode file '.obj/conf.o' Linked in file '.obj/conf.o' Linking

If I can squeeze a message between the discussions on security (:-)) I have been trying to compile a kernel on an x86_64 box under CentOS4.1 and now 4.2. The problem is that neither make xconfig or make gconfig work: make gconfig * * Unable to find the GTK+ installation. Please make sure that * the GTK+ 2.0 development package is correctly installed... * You need gtk+-2.0, glib-2.0 and

I think I have experienced this when more than one module contains definitions for the same values. ie. it should only be a declaration in one of them. On 8/15/07, Holger Schurig <hs4233 at mail.mn-solutions.de> wrote: > I'm using llvm-ld from SVN r41106 > > When issueing the command > > $ /usr/src/llvm/installed/bin/llvm-ld -v -stats -native -O1 -strip-all -o main \ >

Hi I am having trouble compiling some 2.6 kernels on a x86_64 box under CentOS4.1. I cannot use xconfig at all and menuconfig on my system is unreadable. It appears to be something to do with the Qt library but I have all the necessary bits installed: qt-devel-3.3.3-9.3 qt-3.3.3-9.3 but note that the second of these only is installed both for x86 and x86_64 - the first is installed for x86_64

Hello, I'm totally new to this list, so I hope I don't break all the rules. :) I've looked through the archives (and google), and I really can't find the answer to my question. I'm trying out the 'detect-renamed'-patch, and I've encountered some odd behavior. I've applied the patch to both rsync-2.6.9 and rsync-3.0.0pre7, and it's the same behavior.

Everytime I try to recompile a kernel, "make modules" always dies with the error: mv: cannot stat `include/asm-i386/asm_offsets.h.tmp': No such file or directory make: *** [include/asm-i386/asm_offsets.h] Error 1 I installed the src RPM and kernel-devel ... any ideas as to what I could be doing wrong? Thanks!!

I want to share a little LLVM experiment. I tried LLVM on one of my bigger Qt 3.x based projects. I used llvm from SVN trunk (r39999) and SVN llvm-gcc-4.01 (r370) and did compile every file with /usr/src/llvm/dist/bin/g++ -c -pipe -g \ -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare \ ... lots of -Dxxxx ... \ --emit-llvm -I/usr/share/qt3/mkspecs/default \ -I. -I.. -I../../../include/qt3 -I.obj/ \

Holger, I have just committed a patch to cause the linker to properly propagate error messages from the LinkModules method up to higher levels of the linker. With this change it should tell you with more detail what is going on (why it couldn't link the file in). Please update, rebuild and try again. If you think the error message is wrong after that, please file a bug for this. To get

> I think I have experienced this when more than one module > contains definitions for the same values. ie. it should only > be a declaration in one of them. Hmm, when I compile and link this with plain gcc, it everything works. Anyway, llvm-ld should probably not just say "Cannot link file 'blah'", but why it cannot link it. I compiled llvm in with --enable-debug.

Hi, I have these extensions: exten => 101,1,Dial(SIP/101,15) exten => 102,1,Dial(SIP/102,15) exten => 0,1,Dial(SIP/101&SIP/102,15,r) They work fine and I get the ringing sound if I dial them directly. However, I also have this extension: exten => s,1,Answer() exten => s,2,Background(viagenie) exten => s,3,WaitExten() The ringing sound doesn't work for any extension

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:40:44PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > Hm..it's been 10 mins..I don't see anything more in the file where I > redirected stdout of 'febootstrap' cmd. > > Roughly, can you guess how much time this takes? For me it has so far taken a lot longer. The problem is that the number of dependent packages is probably 100s. If you want something

Dear R developers, I've been experimenting with embedding R X11 windows into another application using KDE's QXEmbed on linux. Attempting to do so will crash R (with R 2.4.0, trunk, and I know the bug has been around in prior versions). I used to think this was related to bug #848, but I'm not sure, if / how the solution suggested there still applies to current versions of R.

Hi, When using lsof, I see that smbd changes ownership from the actual user who made the connection, to root. Also seeing odd behavior with certain files accessed from XP boxes suddenly becoming "read only" to the user mid edit, and appears to be related. Ex: lsof output at 8:45 AM: smbd 11987 user1 cwd DIR 253,3 4096 704687 /home/Shares/Groups within a

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0442 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0442.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 73447eac806b56cfc12c1b2630e5c9e730711d4b6ffd442c485027055039354b lsof-4.82-4.el6.i686.rpm x86_64:

On Thursday 23 July 2015 16:24:23 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Useful for debugging unmount failures. Note that we include lsof in > the appliance already. > --- > daemon/mount.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/daemon/mount.c b/daemon/mount.c > index c5b7d89..e139482 100644 > --- a/daemon/mount.c > +++ b/daemon/mount.c > @@ -424,6