similar to: Centos 4.1, ClamScan and Kernel Leaks

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Centos 4.1, ClamScan and Kernel Leaks"

2010 Apr 13
3
ClamAV "clamscan" command using huge amount of RAM
We have a perl cgi script that accepts uploaded files and runs clamscan on them. While observing the system performance I noticed that each clamscan process consumes up to 250MB of RAM. Is this normal for ClamAV? This seems like an enormous amount of RAM, for simply scanning one file for viruses.
2006 Jan 17
2
clamscan --exclude problems
this is strange to me but maybe not to y'all I use clamscan --exclude in other places but this certain one will not work... let me put up my fstab before I explain k: # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see 'man fstab-sync' for details LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/boot1 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2 none
2008 Jan 08
2
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Hi Edwin, I ran into two problems. 1. Using your config file and Makefile, I ran into issue compiling with gcc: gcc -I/Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/ Applications/ClamAV -I/Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/projects/llvm-test/ MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV -I/\Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/include -I/ Users/echeng/LLVM/llvm/projects/llvm-test/include -I../../..//include
2008 Jan 30
0
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Devang has fixed the bug. I've added ClamAV to the testsuite. Thanks! Evan On Jan 13, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I've filed > http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1912 > for the optimizer bug. > > Evan > > On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are getting closer. >> >> 1. In Makefile, all
2012 Sep 17
1
ClamAV Problem
Dear Friends, I have postfix mail server When I try to install amavisd-new, clamAV, SpamAssassin follow this link "http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd". I have done all the configuration after that when I restart clamav So It is giving my this error message Stopping Clam AntiVirus Daemon: [FAILED] Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Error:
2008 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
I've filed http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1912 for the optimizer bug. Evan On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:28 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Hi, > > We are getting closer. > > 1. In Makefile, all the references to CFLAGS should be CPPFLAGS > instead. > 2. filterdiff.sh uses sed -re. This causes a problem on Mac OS X where > -E means using extended regular expression, not
2008 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Hi, We are getting closer. 1. In Makefile, all the references to CFLAGS should be CPPFLAGS instead. 2. filterdiff.sh uses sed -re. This causes a problem on Mac OS X where -E means using extended regular expression, not -r. sed: illegal option -- r usage: sed script [-Ealn] [-i extension] [file ...] sed [-Ealn] [-i extension] [-e script] ... [-f script_file] ... [file ...] Can this
2008 Jan 10
4
[LLVMdev] Adding ClamAV to the llvm testsuite (long)
Török Edwin wrote: > Yes, I have uploaded the .tar.gz here: > http://edwintorok.googlepages.com/ClamAV-srcflat.tar.gz > [inputs dir contains some symlink, place ClamAV dir in > llvm/projects/llvm-test/MultiSource/Applications to make > links point to right place] > > Hi, Because llvm bug #1730 got fixed, this testcase can run under with the JIT on x86-64 :). I have
2019 Feb 07
2
Did I install too much for clamav?
I just checked the status of amavisd: # systemctl -l status amavisd ? amavisd.service - Amavisd-new is an interface between MTA and content checkers. ?? Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/amavisd.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled) ?? Active: active (running) since Thu 2019-02-07 08:16:59 EST; 7h ago ???? Docs: http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#doc ? Process: 5715
2016 Sep 29
0
Centos 7.2.1511 with sendmail and a problem with clamav
Everyone, I am putting together a new CentOS 7 mail server for our organization and am having some difficulty getting clamav to work with the clamav- milter for sendmail. I have set /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf to use clamscan as the user as well as root as the user and the status command of systemctl results in the same error messages : ? clamd at scan.service - Generic clamav scanner daemon
2016 Jan 07
2
doveadm search -A tries to create mailboxes
On 1/6/2016 3:29 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 05 Jan 2016, at 15:36, Bill Shirley <Bill at knoxvillechristian.org> wrote: >> >> [0:root at elmo ~]$ rpm -q dovecot >> dovecot-2.2.18-2.fc22.x86_64 >> >> I got a surprise today when I tried the doveadm search function from: >> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/Expire >> >> [0:root at elmo ~]$
2019 Feb 08
0
Did I install too much for clamav?
On 2/7/19 1:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Feb 07 08:16:59 klovia.htt-consult.com amavis[6327]: Using primary > internal av scanner code for ClamAV-clamd > Feb 07 08:16:59 klovia.htt-consult.com amavis[6327]: Found secondary > av scanner ClamAV-clamscan at /usr/bin/clamscan I don't use amavis, but it doesn't seem surprising that it would search the system for
2016 Sep 29
3
Centos 7.2.1511 with sendmail and a problem with clamav
Everyone, I am putting together a new CentOS 7 mail server for our organization and am having some difficulty getting clamav to work with the clamav- milter for sendmail. I have set /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf to use clamscan as the user as well as root as the user and the status command of systemctl results in the same error messages : ? clamd at scan.service - Generic clamav scanner daemon
2012 Oct 02
1
SELinux, Amavis, Clamav
Regarding the brilliant wiki site: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd?highlight=%28Amavis%29 I faced the following issue on CentOS 6.2: "Spamassind" saves each message and its attached part in a folder in clamd accesses the folder, creates itself a temporary folder and deletes it afterwards. This was stopped by SELinux and caused the virus scan to fail. This action causes SE-Linux
2006 Jul 03
2
new clamav update miss 'clamav' user/group creation/update
Hi folks, Just updating clamav 'bundle' from old 'clamav-server' (i think the just previous) and i noticed that the 'clamav' user/group for this pkg is not created by default by the rpm pkg. At the same time, the /var/log/clamav is not updated/created with clamav.clamav ownership, Don't know if it is my actual config (previous one untouched anyway), but this is what
2014 Dec 11
0
CentOS-6 Another email related AVC
CentOS-6.6 Postfix-2.11.1 (local) ClamAV-0.98.5 (epel) Amavisd-new-2.9.1 (epel) opendkim-2.9.0 (centos) pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1 (epel) /var/log/maillog Dec 11 16:52:09 inet18 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/perl from read access on the file online. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 62006e35-dcc8-4a4f-8e10-9f34757f3a4a Dec 11 16:52:10 inet18 setroubleshoot: SELinux is
2012 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] Incorrect values of GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns in the report.html
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Simon Atanasyan <satanasyan at mips.com> wrote: > I run LLVM test suite using the following command and get > report.nightly.html successfully. > > % make report.html TEST=nightly > > But GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns look strange. Here > is for example snippet of "clamscan" test result: > [[ > Program
2012 Nov 12
2
[LLVMdev] Incorrect values of GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns in the report.html
Hi, I run LLVM test suite using the following command and get report.nightly.html successfully. % make report.html TEST=nightly But GCC/LLC, GCC/LLC-BETA and LLC/LLC-BETA columns look strange. Here is for example snippet of "clamscan" test result: [[ Program MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan GCC 0.2360 LLC 0.2360
2016 Sep 30
1
Centos 7.2.1511 with sendmail and a problem with clamav
On Sep 29, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.net> wrote: > > I had set the log file in scan.conf to be /var/log/clamd.scan having > the user and group name of clamscan and protections of -rw-rw-rw- I don?t use ClamAV, but I?ll bet it runs as a non-root user. In CentOS 7, only root can write to /var/log. You should create a clamav directory under /var/log and
2009 Nov 16
4
[LLVMdev] SAFECode Source Code Released
Török Edwin wrote: > [snip] > > I applied the attached patch to make it compile on my box (Debian > x86_64), only to find out that x86_64 is not supported :( > This architecture is not supported by the pool allocator! > Aborted > Thanks for the patch. What options do I give to the patch command to apply it to the source code? Although there's no documentation about