similar to: Re: Fix passwd/shadow/group files? -- Samba is not an enterprise ? irectory solution ...

From: Mark Jarvis <mark.jarvis at pvmail.maricopa.edu> > HUH? FAT32 problem??? No, it's a geometry issue on legacy BIOS/DOS Disk Labels (Partition Table Format) aka "Basic Disc" in NT5+ (2000+) when both NT and Linux share the disk for booting. Microsoft never standardized how geometry should be handled after NT4.0 Service Pack 4 (SP4) other than using legacy LBA32 --

I use Centos 4.2 with all service pack installed. I verified traffic on link WEB and I see port TCP 80 with many traffic. I accessed lod /var/log/httpd/access_log and show below. ca.com/members/index.php HTTP/1.0" 401 - "http://members.sapphicerotica.com/members/index.php" "Mozilla/5.0 ( compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows XP; NetCaptor )" 68.119.110.138 - -

On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, cruff at ucar.edu wrote: > Full_Name: Craig Ruff > Version: 2.7.1 > OS: Irix 6.5.30 > Submission from: (NULL) (128.117.8.145) > > > Cairo based bitmap graphics output should work if cairo and R have been compiled > without xlib support. 2.7.1 gives the "X11 is not available" message in this > case when run interactively, and from my

From: Feizhou > You assume too much and you are not clear enough in what > you post. You didn't even know what a KDC was, so my assumptions were pretty easy to make. You keep saying "Samba, Samba, Samba" over and over like Samba does it all. It does _not_. > Geez....I've been trying to get whether you are saying there was a way > to do the whole ADS DC thing

While trying to set up samba as a PDC, I followed O'Reillys Using Samba. This resulted in the following smb.conf: [global] workgroup = GRAHAM encrypt passwords = true log level = 1 max log size = 1000 hosts allow = 192.168.0/24 192.168.1/24 hosts deny = 1.1.1.1/0.0.0.0 domain logons = yes security = user os level = 34 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes [temp]

From: Feizhou > I know what a Kerberos authentication system is. > You mean a core component in Samba 3.0's functionality as an ADS client. You're still artificially limiting your understanding. Kerberos (with the MS extensions in the case of 200x/XP) is how objects authenticate each other and grant tickets for access in a Kerberos realm. Samba can use Kerberos how it sees fit.

On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 16:20 +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > I don't think the problem is with mentioning 'Dovecot', it is with > using > the DC for anything other than authentication. > > Reading the Dovecot wiki page, creating the user & SPN on the DC is > okay, but once you start exporting the keytab to be used on the DC, > you > are doing something

Hi! I'm trying to port a windows code to linux via winelib. After running winemaker I get the project files and run ./configure. At a certain point the following message appears on the console: checking for windef.h... configure: error: Could not find the Wine headers (windef.h) I have the windef.h file in a irectory named /usr/include/wine/windows/. Do I need to setup any environment

I'm having a problem that I'm not sure the cause of. I've never had a problem with wineinstall until recently. I have full read/write access to my Windows partition and wineinstall can see it. However it fails to find the Windows registry for some reason. I'm running Windows Me, on that partition. For Linux I'm running Redhat 7, and latest CVS. Here's the messages I get.

HI all I am having just a bugger of a time trying to get this freebsd 7 box installed under xen. Here is my config file: [root@COBRA1 ~]# cat /etc/xen/FBSD7 name = ''FBSD7'' builder = ''hvm'' device_model = ''/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm'' kernel = ''/usr/lib64/xen/boot/hvmloader'' acpi =

On Thu, 2016-07-14 at 22:05 +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > On 14/07/16 21:52, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > >  > > Rowland: > > > > Running samba-tool domain exportkeytab for a specific user is quite > > a > > reasonable thing to do, and is entirely sensible to recommand as > > part > > of adding a new user with an SPN.  They keytab can then be

A couple of things: - it is defaulted to 1.0.5, but if there was a "current" I could probably use that instead. - it seems like everyone might not use the rspec_on_rails piece...what do other think? - there are some other checks I could put in here, suggestions are welcome. - general code suggestions are welcome as well. Mike B. Here is my ruby version: #!/usr/bin/ruby -w

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0431 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0431 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0431 shadow-utils security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0431 shadow-utils security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0276 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-61.RHEL4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0276 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-61.RHEL4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-61.RHEL4.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:842 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-842.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.i386.rpm src: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:842 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-842.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.x86_64.rpm src: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: