similar to: Fix passwd/shadow/group files?

Hi all, Somebody has tested directory server (http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page) under CentOS 4.1?? Is it ready for production environments?? Somebody has ported to centos?? Thank you very much. __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ?gratis! Reg?strate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/

From: "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org>" > So? I've been authenticating Samba against NIS servers since > the mid-'90s ... > You can even use pGINA to replace your NT/200x/XP login to > authenticate against other servers ... > If you are the former, you _can_ switch _away_ from CIFS altogether! > Samba will _never_ reverse engineer all of

Hello, I added the support for netgroups to be used in the AllowUsers and DenyUsers parameters. This has some advantages: * hostnames or ip addresses need not to be written or maintained in the sshd_config file, but can be kept abstract names what also simplifies a bit largescale openssh installations * sshd_config needs not change and sshd be restarted when changing the list of allowed /

Hello, I have a question that I was wondering if someone could help me with. I am an admin at RIT and we have a large network base of Sun machines. We do authentication via NIS over NFS. We are about to receive a full lab of Windows boxes and need to set up a samba server to serve users' home directories to the Windows boxes. This initial configuration is relatively easy, but we want

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212 ------- Additional Comments From Michael.Gerdts at alcatel.com 2002-04-11 00:33 ------- This patch also changes the behavior of ssh-keyscan when a hostname does not resolve. I have changed the condition from fatal() to error() so that the scan does not quit when it runs across a bad hostname. ------- You are receiving this mail because:

For systems where the local hostname is obtained as a short name without domain, there should be a ssh_config option "DefaultDomain" as in ssh-3.x from ssh.com. For the server, there might be a corresponding option in order to strip the domain name from the remote client name (if it matches the server's DefaultDomain) for use in auth_rhost2, since netgroups usually contain short

I am using CentOS 5.7. I have an /etc/security/access.conf file which has the following: + : root : LOCAL + : @mynetgroup : ALL - : ALL : ALL I thought this is supposed to restrict access to the system to only root and the accounts in the mynetgroup netgroup; however, anyone NIS account is still able to login. It appears that the access.conf is being ignored completely, so I'm thinking

From: Feizhou > You assume too much and you are not clear enough in what > you post. You didn't even know what a KDC was, so my assumptions were pretty easy to make. You keep saying "Samba, Samba, Samba" over and over like Samba does it all. It does _not_. > Geez....I've been trying to get whether you are saying there was a way > to do the whole ADS DC thing

Hmm, thanks to all who replied... you've actually made me think of another question... I gues it's a bit odd on this list to see someone who's looking at using AD that doesn't know anything about it... last time I was tempted down the Windows path it was Win9x. Anyway, you mentioned "netgroup management", which makes me wonder if the other NIS style maps can be

Hi all, We're running gpfs 3.5.0.12 (5 total nsds & quorum servers, 2 nsds running samba), sernet-samba 4.1.4-7, and ctdb 1.0.114.7-1 and trying to get transparent failover to work from a windows 8 client. We have ctdb failover working, i.e. if I run mmshutdown on one of the nodes the IPs failover in a few seconds after the GPFS mount is unmounted. For our transparent failover test, I

Hi I'm using either V3.2 or V4.2p1 depending on the system. Server - OSF/1 V5.1 latest patch kit. If the system has all the accounts in the password file - ssh lets the users login. If the system has "+" at the end of the passwd file, users in the local password file or in NIS can login if I change the /etc/svc.conf to have "passwd=local" and add + at users:x:::::

I looked at the 1.3 whitelist documentation and realized that the ops example, while interesting in and of itself, did not do what I think a whitelist does. Back to symmetry, if a blacklist is a list of sites not allowed to connect in through the fire wall, maybe to a web server, for example, then a whitelist should be a list of machines that are allowed to access a service or services, again,

Hi, I need to set up a small server for a group of ~10 employees (all using Windows 2000/XP, used to use a windows 2000/exchange setup). I have a linux server already running CentOS 4, so I'd like to do all I can with this. I thought about using Samba for file/print sharing and OpenXchange (commercial version) to have a nice collaborative/mail/calendar/etc server. Of course, it would

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a >

Hi, I'm running 3.0.28a on Ubuntu 8.04 (their package). I've got security = ads and idmap backend = ad (smb.conf is posted below). I'm using libnss-ldap and have ldap in nsswitch.conf (also posted below) and ldap connected to the AD server. I have the drive mounted using acl and xattr_user options in fstab (acl is installed). I can connect to the share, I see in the logs that

Hi, I've never been a Windows user, but I'm curious to see how the AD integration works in Linux, since it looks like we may need to have one or two Windows desktops and I don't realy want to start setting up Windows infrastructure. If I can have Samba as a domain controller that makes things a lot simpler. I have one question tho, the documentation suggests using the Microsoft

Hi Everyone I'm new to samba and I have been trying in vein to find a solution to this problem. I am setting up a linux samba server as a domain member server. It is part of the MAINT workgroup. Winbind and Samba authenticate correctly. The issue arises when I try to limit the users who are allowed to use a my share folder. Most of the information I have lookup seem to say that I should

Hello; Sorry for the crosspost/repost, but I am getting desparate here. I am having difficulties setting up ssh (ossh4.3p2 - NIS -Solaris8/Sparc) to authenticate and allow ossh access based on NIS netgroup. So, users and/or host should be from a valid netgroup triple, contained within the ossh servers .rhosts, .shosts, hosts.equiv and/or shosts.equiv. I am having alot of trouble getting NIS

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:57 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 09:41, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > >> On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen

I seem to have this very odd issue with CentOS 6 WRT NIS. I have taken the package selection that I used with CentOS 5 and basically plopped it into my C6 kickstart file (see below). On C5 this works just fine and I'm able to log in with NIS credentials just fine. However, it looks like on C6 if you use a package selection like this, you also need to specify the yp-tools package as part of