similar to: ftp daemon problem

I've got a server running CentOS 4.2; installed as 4.1, kept updated by yum. A few days ago it crashed. I picked it up from the datacenter, and brought it back to the office, where it took a long time to boot because it couldn't find anything. When it finally booted and I logged in I discovered an interesting problem. Only the / partition had loaded. /etc/fstab had all the

Circumstances: The system is a hardware duplicate of a system that installed and works for many months. Running CentOS 4.x. The system was previously in service with CentOS 3.x and I'm trying to install CentOS 4.1 on it from downloaded CDs which have worked previously (these are the same CDs used to install the system that's working). Software RAID. Minimal packages System

I just installed CentOS4 on my main server. It runs proftpd and is not NATted.. When I did the install I said to allow FTP and HTTP. I can ftp from windows dos ftp client. In IE I get "Unable to build data connection: No route to host" ncftp I get.. Data connection timed out. Falling back to PORT instead of PASV mode. List failed. Wget and FireFox just time out. Anything I need

I'm using CentOS 4.4 <snip> # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 4.4 (Final) # </snip> I downloaded and installed greylistd as follows: greylistd-0.8.3.2-7.el4.at.noarch.rpm from: http://riksun.riken.go.jp/pub/pub/Linux/atrpms/rhel/4/en/i386/RPMS.at-stable/ I installed it without problems. <snip> # rpm -Uvh greylistd-0.8.3.2-7.el4.at.noarch.rpm warning:

I'm trying to run "yum update" on "CentOS release 3.4 (final)": But I'm getting an error: <snip> Package mod_ssl needs httpd = 2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2, this is not available. </snip> However: </snip> [root at dev1 root]# rpm -qa | grep httpd httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2 </snip> It's installed. So I

I''m still using CentOS 3.3 as our install mechanism, then adding some packages from a tarball of RPMs we need. Then I run # yum update yum which sometimes takes a while. Yesterday it took many hours. I like to run these from behind a firewall in our office before taking the server to the datacenter, but the delay meant a whole day''s delay in our trip to the datacenter

I have a site running the current version of Centos 4.2, it has a shopping cart running on it and runs slow and times out at random. The cart is a simple php package using a MySQL database backend. Can any one think of ways to improve the speed in MySQL and Apache, I've had the cart checked by the software vendor, it's working like it should, they are pointing to MySQL or Apache and

We've got several CentOS 3.x systems running DNS that we keep updated automatically via YUM. Recently two of those systems (not all of them) when updating themselves to the latest versions of BIND, automatically replaced /etc/named.conf with a new one and saved the old one as /etc/named.conf.rpmsave. Which of course broke DNS for those servers. All servers got updated, but only two of

We're going to replace an older Solaris7/Netbackup/TapeRobot server with a new Centos box using backup-to-disk-to-tape (probably using Arkeia). The specs are up in the air, but generally: - CentOS/RHEL friendly (3Ware SATA? SCSI?) - 2U/3U/4U-ish form factor - hotswap RAID5 - dual PS, hotswap a plus - USB2.0 port(s) (*) To give you an idea of where I'm starting to look, take a gander at

I have a server running CentOS 4.2 that works as a web/email with very heavy load. It runs Directadmin web gui which is like Cpanel. It runs on a cheapy mATX motherboard(ECS 741GX-M) with socket A 2800+ CPU and 2Gbyte DDR. The OS and data are on a 300Gbyte PATA maxtor drive and data backups are run weekly to another PATA drive. The server is overwelmed and data backups take over 5 hours to

Hah!!! This list is just too calm and mundane. The only thing we argue about is the ''announce'' list vs. the ''user'' list. ;) So, it''s springtime! I''m seeing all the regularly scheduled ''oil'' threads on my motorcycle lists and thought "oh what the heck, lets get the ''oil'' thread going over on the CentOS

I'm a home user of CentOS (a desktop and a laptop) because I like the quality of the product and I love the cost. I'm a great believer in FOSS. That being said, I know that some of you use CentOS for production servers and (perhaps?) desktops as well. I've read at leat one comment like "I have 20 CentOS servers." My employer is a firm believer in RHEL - license costs are

Hey list, Sorry for all the questions today. But I am trying to wrap up this ftp business and still having some issues. I appreciate your input. SELinux is temporarily disabled (until I can work this all out) and I am now able to log into the FTP server. [root at LCENT05:~] #/usr/bin/ftp localhost Connected to localhost (127.0.0.1). 220 FTP Server ready. Name (localhost:root): bluethundr

Hi, ok Im all new to this :-) for pasv ftp in your example you say for example to use ports 65500-65535, but i dont see that u open those ports in your example fw scripts..? any hints ? -- Christophe Zwecker mail: doc@zwecker.de Hamburg, Germany fon: +49 179 3994867 http://www.zwecker.de "Who is General Failure ? And why is he reading my disk

Hi, I have a cisco sdsl modem to connect to internet via eth1 (192.168.1.2) local is eth0 (192.168.2.254) default gw is 192.168.1.1 the cisco forwards all incoming ports to 192.168.1.2. I connect from outside on port 24562, login is successfull, the ftpserver gives back the external Ip of the cisco as pasv IP to the client (its a setting in the ftpserver). It gives an ip from the pasv range I

I''v don all the work that was shown on the installation documentaion but It still can''t send PASV comands and ares up the is their somthing i''m missing from the Rules. ### # Shorewall version 1.3 - Rules File # # /etc/shorewall/rules REJECT:info loc net tcp 6667,137,138,139 REJECT:info loc net udp 137,138,139 #REDIRECT

Hello, I am setting up ProFTPd daemon (from EPEL repository) under CentOS 5.2 and I need encrypted connection. Daemon is configured perfectly, there is no problem - if iptables is off connection is smoothly established, but when iptables is on, connection in FTP client ends on command LIST without response. Last command with response (positive) is PASV. Thank you for your replies Martin ??astn?

Hi list, im having a problem with proftpd access when my firewall is running. Im using centos 4.3 with proftpd-1.2.10-10.2.el4.rf i haven't done any modification from my proftpd i just run the server. my iptables ruleset is very simple i use stateful routing. iptables -A INPUT -i ! $WAN -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -i $WAN -m state --state NEW -p tcp --dport 21 -j ACCEPT -- Regards,

I manage a small server that I back up weekly. I do this by making a tarball of relevant files then transferring it over the local subnet to my station (Fedora 11), whereupon I burn it to DVD. There is no optical burner on the server. The tarball amounts to a bit under 5 gigs. Recently I've started getting an error telling me to try PASV or PORT first. I use the gFTP client on my

Hi All, Please feel free to correct any misconceptions in my premises as I get to my question. I have about 6 ftp services running on a CentOS system that is going down for service, and I want to move the ftp services to a VM on another network. These are all running on Proftpd, with fairly complicated directory/permissions/rate control layouts, as proftpd nicely supports. First, it appears