similar to: Non-PRI T1 showing red

I'm trying to hook up a non-PRI fractional T1 using a T400P port. The Telco says that it is provisioned as AMI with SF (not ESF) and that they are signalling by "sending down a straight DS1" (I'm not sure what exactly that means). They are also sending DNIS over these channels. I currently run it through a channel bank for my IVR application and it works fine but I am now

Dear All, I got a warning message "X matrix deemed to be singular" in Cox model with a time dependent coefficient. In my analysis, the variable "SEX" is a categorical variable which violate the PH assumption in Cox. I first used the survSplit() function to break the data set into different time intervals, and then fit the model. The procedures can be described as follows:

Hello Everyone, I have two never-used, still in the static-bag T400P Cards that I bought a long while back that I'd like to get rid of. Before I ever got a chance to use them, I bought Sangoma A400 Cards instead, and now I definately don't need them any longer. They have the Dallas DS21Q352 Chip on them (A4 Revision). I'll be happy to test them before I ship them if you like.

Greetings, I have stumbled across some unexpected behavior (potential a bug) in, what I suspect to be R's (2.6.2 on Ubuntu Linux) t.test function; then again the problem may exist in my code. I have shutdown R and started it back up, re-run the code and re-experienced the error. I have searched on Google for the abnormal termination error message "(stderr < 10 * .Machine$double.eps *

Modem connect speeds on calls through * seem to be lower than calls made through the telephone company lines or our old Rolm PBX. All data calls have 2 wire analog modems on both ends. For my set up I have channels of a Zhone channel bank tied to 2 modems. The Zhone channel bank interfaces my * server with a T400P card. modem --- Zhone Channel bank - * via T400P card - Zhone channel bank -

I have a T1 PRI from the telco and have been trying to get it to work with the wildcard T400P. I know framing and coding is esf and b8zs. what else should I be putting into the zaptel.conf and zapata.conf. Dave Anderson

Good day everyone, A Solution now exists for those of you still looking for the first model of Quad T1/E1 Interface Cards - the T400P and E400P. The T400P and E400P were manufactured by Digium until a few months ago, and were designed and released under the GNU Public License as the Tormenta II by Zapata Telephony. Varion, Inc. is now in full production manufacturing these boards. With the

Dear List after a lot googling and watching source example of FastAGI i cant find a simple way to convert a very simple perl AGI script... perhaps im not a developer.. Why i have need to use FastAGI?...Very load CPU usage on my box... with only 100 calls.. So i have two way res_perl or FastAGI on some other box.. I cant test res_perl becasue when i try to compile it i have this error:

Hi, We are trying to validate Asterisk as a media gateway PRI <-> SIP with two T400P (8 T1s) per box. The first experience with BOX1 (Compaq, 2.53 GHz, 1 Gb RAM) and just one T400P was encouraging - on the load test with 3 T1s worth of calls we had on average 75% idle CPU. Not so with BOX2 (Dell, single 2.6 GHz Xeon, 1 Gb RAM, 2 T400P) and BOX3 (Dell, dual 2.6 GHz Xeon, 2 Gb RAM, 2 T400P,

Hi All, I'm on of those brave souls who bought into the preproduction beta of the Sipura SPA-3000 FXS/FXO adapter. I've had the unit a few days and am exploring it's workings. I really want it mostly as a straightforward FXO adapter, to replace an X101p. Let me be clear, I'd love to support Digium in every way possibe, and will likely buy a TDM40 card shortly. But, the X101p has

Hi, I've posted this question on OpenSS7 mailing list but I didn't get a clear answer. I have a system running asterisk using Digium T400P card. Can this same card be used with OpenSS7 project to carry SS7 links? Is there any difference between these two cards? -- Matteo D'Amato Network/Telecom Administrator Intelco Communication Inc

Anyone care to elaborate on the differences between the T400P and the TE405P? -Darren -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050908/e817f8bb/attachment.htm

Can T400P be configured for nfas (one d-channel providing signaling for more than one span)? Thank you. Alex Zarubin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030522/f2b637a9/attachment.htm

Hi all... I did some Google searches and didn't find any info on this so I'm posting it here... if this was recently discussed, I apologize for the duplication -- please point me to the appropriate thread. System Description: Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-MF w/ PDSMi Motherboard Intel Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz CPU 2 GB DDR2 Memory Digium T400P 4 Port T1 Card CentOS 5.1 (Final) Kernel:

I've been trying to get a Win 2000 RAS server working with my asterisk PBX for quite some time, to no avail. I've googled, I've tried loads of configurations, I've rewired phone lines, and still I am not winning the battle. Here's my config. PRI->T400P->Asterisk->T400P->Adtran 750(L36 Firmware)->RAS Server. I have 4 Zap channels signalled FXO_KS to the 750

OK, I think I'm ready for the next step from the X100P. Splitting a T1 with a T100P and a channel bank/s ~ 50 extensions. I think the existing system uses NEC phones for ~34 extensions, I don't know the specific model yet of the phones or the channel bank. If the channel bank is not compatible with Asterisk/digium what brand should I be looking at to interface best with Asterisk and

FYI: I hope that this is not a "me" error and that Digium can squash this bug (or new hardware fixes it). Either way, when this is over, perhaps I can provide some troubleshooting documentation for these errors. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:36:51 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew McRory <amcrory@linuxsys.com> To: support@digium.com Subject: PRI Errors

Another issue to consider is T1 framing. If your application is putting bits onto the T1 at the rate of 1.544 Mbit/s then the T1 would need to be unframed. I don't believe this is an option in zaptel! If however, it is putting bits on at a rate of 1.536 Mbit/s and adding 8000 bit/s for framing then you may be able use the suggestion below. Don Pobanz On Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:28 PM,

Hi, I'm looking into support for SS7 and I found an article (http://www.openss7.com/news13022002.html) which says that OpenSS7 supports Linux Support Inc's T400P-SS7 Quad T1 and E400P-SS7 Quad E1 PCI interface cards. It also says that Linux Support Inc is the primary sponsor of Asterisk. However I cannot find these cards on the Asterisk hardware page