similar to: RE: No subject by Steve M

Hi All, born out of frustration with conflicting info on the net, I thought I'd share a simple guide to set up the port forwarding side of masquerading... this presumes you already have basic ipchains setup and simple masquerading of internal machines installed. PORT FORWARDING USING IPMASQADM. “Ipmasqadm” supercedes the “ipportfw” feature. 1 - Upgrade to Kernel 2.2.12-20 if not already

Howdy, I tried tackling this on irc with Ivo, but I suspect that irc may really not be the best medium for technical discussions, so I'll reprise it here. I am trying to duplicate the "tinc from behind a masquerading firewall" example from the tinc web site: (home) <--> (masquerading firewall) <--> (office) 192.168.1.21 192.168.1.1/1.2.3.4

Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote 192.168.1.20) from this server to another server without public ip and behind a router. I wanted to make the second server visible to the world, so

Excuse me form reposting the quesiton, but I didn''t find any solution. Any suggestion is welcome Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip o(1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 and 3.3.3.3 on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote

Hi All I have had a look through the documentation but I can''t see how to do this. I want to setup DNAT for an incoming connection. The connection must be forwarded to a server on a masqueraded server behind the firewall. The tricky part is I need to forward to a different port to the one that the request arrived on. I can do this: firewall.public.ip:5800 ->

Greetings from a newbie! (Well, to this list anyway) I''m having a problem and I hope someone here might be able to help... I am strongly expecting an answer along the lines of "upgrade to v2.4.x", but I would REALLY preffer to avoid that for now... The setup: "Home brewed" v2.2.24 (will patch to v2.2.25 later today) with the DS8 patch applied. Currently

Howdy all, I posted this message to the netfilter mailing-list and didn''t get much response. I apologize if anyone here is getting this for a second time. Anyway, I recently migrated my firewall from a FreeBSD box running ipfilter, ipnat and dummynet to a Gentoo Linux box running netfilter and tc. I have to admit that I''m having problems visualizing tc in my head. So, I was

Hi all I have a problem to register a cisco 7960 to an asterisk 1.2.2 I defined in sip.conf the next : ["phonenumber"] type=friend username="username" secret="password" host=dynamic context=work I am trying to catch the register requests with sip debug with no success (empty screen). I can only catch the register messages with ngrep on

Hi all I have a problem to register a cisco 7960 to an asterisk 1.2.2 I defined in sip.conf the next : ["phonenumber"] type=friend username="username" secret="password" host=dynamic context=work I am trying to catch the register requests with sip debug with no success (empty screen). I can only catch the register messages with ngrep on host it's comming

Hi all, I need to register asterisk on an OpenSIPS SIP Proxy...The Registration is OK but my asterisk is sending OPTIONS packets to OpenSIPS and the SIP Proxy is not replying back...The issue is the UNKNOWN username that reside in the OPTIONS packet as you can see in the captured packets as you can see below: 1. U Asterisk_IP:5060 -> OPENSIPS_IP:5060 2. OPTIONS sip:OPENSIPS_IP

Anything to do about portscans? Is there any way (should I) to see if the connection is a legit (only SIP currently) connection BEFORE my * answers? [2007-10-17 19:23:46] WARNING[4191]: chan_sip.c:6624 determine_firstline_parts: Bad request protocol 01@<ASTERISK_IP> SIP/2.0 -- Executing [s at default:1] Answer("SIP/sip.jmg.se-081dd730", "") in new stack [2007-10-17

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [libvirt] Problem with Open vSwitch and dnsmasq From: aatteka at nicira.com To: dano1988 at hotmail.it CC: libvir-list at redhat.com; roberto.sassu at polito.it; paolo.smiraglia at polito.it; dev at openvswitch.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it> wrote: I think I could try the first solution.

(Cc'ing to libvirt-users at redhat.com) On 03/22/2012 02:43 PM, Ansis Atteka wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniele Milani <dano1988 at hotmail.it > <mailto:dano1988 at hotmail.it>> wrote: > > I think I could try the first solution. Can you explain me how do > I create the port used by dnsmasq? > > For example, is it correct

The SIP trunking service that I am trying to set up keeps saying that my registration from Asterisk is invalid. Asterisk registration: REGISTER sip:{registration_ip} SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP {asterisk_ip}:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5c2eb10c;rport Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:{registration_user}@{registration_ip}>;tag=as5579cc0c To: <sip:{registration_user}@{registration_ip}> Call-ID:

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

The current way of handling refcounting in the DP MST helpers is really confusing and probably just plain wrong because it's been hacked up many times over the years without anyone actually going over the code and seeing if things could be simplified. To the best of my understanding, the current scheme works like this: drm_dp_mst_port and drm_dp_mst_branch both have a single refcount. When

So a 70-persistent-net.rules like # onboard port 1 -> eth0 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:00:19.0", NAME="eth0" # PCIe card -> eth2 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:03:00.0", NAME="eth2" # onboard port 2 -> eth1 ACTION=="add",

*Dear All, I run the below tcp dump on my asterisk server tcpdump -i eth0 -n -s0 -v udp port 5060 I got the following result 20:29:48.596867 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto 17, length: 373) SIP_PROXY_IP.5060 > Asterisk_IP.5060: UDP, length 345 What i need to know please what TTL means specifically and what is the best value og TTL and what is the lengh vale mean

So I'm back to this problem. A quick run down of what the original problem was: I have a machine that I'm configuring to use kickstart to setup. It has two builtin ethernet ports (labeled ports 1 and 2) and I'm adding a third one on its PCIe bus. Originally I was using an r8169 clone a default kickstart always put it as eth0 with the builtin ones as eth1 and eth2 respectively. After

another identical machine will have the same bus ids. that's why this works. Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd GitHub: @tartansandal Suite 1416 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia "All parts should go together without forcing. You must