similar to: SRV lookup fails after DNS update

Hey gang, I'm trying to setup the ability to dial a SIP user via their email address. I'm using SJPhone as my tester UA, but most clients will be using XTen Pro. I added an SRV DNS entry into our zone, and it returns: ; <<>> DiG 9.2.1 <<>> SRV _sip._udp.cytelcom.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status:

Let's say I have a third-party device acting as a sip<-->pstn gateway, a cluster of three asterisk servers, and a teensy bit of dns knowledge. Let's now say those asterisk servers are a1.company.com at 192.168.0.1, a2.company.com at 192.168.0.2, and a3.company.com at 192.168.0.3. 1. If I setup round-robin dns like so: asterisk.company.com. IN A 192.168.0.1 asterisk.company.com. IN

Given the following SRV records: _sip._udp.tollfree.sip-happens.com. 38400 IN SRV 10 0 5060 sometimes.sip-happens.com. _sip._udp.tollfree.sip-happens.com. 38400 IN SRV 20 0 5070 ares.sip-happens.com. Why is asterisk (1.4.17) not honouring the priority and not failing over to using other records when a connection fails? For a given call to tollfree.sip-happens.com ares.sip-happens.com was chosen

Can asterisk use SRV record from DNS? In example - I've got: _sip._tcp.gda.pl. SRV 0 0 5060 welbot.task.gda.pl. _sip._udp.gda.pl. SRV 1 0 5060 welbot.task.gda.pl. And it works with sipd (from Columbia) and vocal. I see that with asterisk it does not want to work... :-/ -- pozdr. Pawe? Go?aszewski --------------------------------- worth to see:

Hi all, I'm trying to provision my PAP2T's to use a SVR lookup to find the Asterisk server. I'm using a provisioning file that contains an element like: <Proxy_1_> _sip._udp.example.com </Proxy_1_> However, the PAP doesn't seem to be able to find my server with this hostname. The DNS records are in place because my Polycom and Grandstream servers work just fine.

I have added in my zone file; _sip._udp.elmit.com. IN SRV 20 0 5060 vpbx.elmit.com. As I understand it should mean that any sip connection to <anyname>@elmit.com should go to the udp port 5060 at the host vpb.elmit.com. In Asterisk's extensions.conf I have in the context [default] exten => ronald,1,Dial(${PHONE_615},60,tr) exten => ronald,2,Voicemail,u615@office exten =>

i'm posting this to the bind-users and rsync mailing lists in order to get this archived for the next person who needs to do this :) comments and suggestions are welcome, but please cc: to me because i'm not subscribed to either list. craig ----- Forwarded message from Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> ----- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:30:20 +1000 From: Craig Sanders

Hello To cut down on the number of hackers trying to break into an Asterisk server, I'd like to simply move the SIP port from the standard UDP 5060 to something non-standard. Since this server must be able to receive INVITEs from any SIP UA (server or client), it appears that I must add an SRV record in the DNS so that they can locate the server and the port used to reach it. _sip._udp SRV

Dear authors of NSD, currently, the manpages that come with NSD are written in the traditional man(7) markup language. I am proposing to rewrite them into the semantic markup of the mdoc(7) language. I am willing to do the work. See a version of nsd-checkzone.8 below as an example. Both the man(7) and mdoc(7) languages have been around for decades, and are supported by the prevalent formatters:

Hi Chris, I'm having trouble trying to reproduce the issue locally. Like you I configure two zones. zone: name: example.com. zonefile: example.com.zone.signed zone: name: bar.example.com. zonefile: bar.example.com.zone The file bar.example.com.zone does not exist. After touching and reloading the signed zone, no segfault occurs. I've tried with and without the

Hi Jeroen, Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? Ex: a.bar 300 IN NS ns.somewhere.net. Chris ________________________________ From: Jeroen Koekkoek <jeroen at nlnetlabs.nl> Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 5:33 AM To: Chris LaVallee <clavallee at edg.io>; nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl <nsd-users at lists.nlnetlabs.nl> Subject: Re:

Information on package 'aod' Description: Package: aod Version: 1.1-2 Date: 2005-06-08 Title: Analysis of Overdispersed Data Author: Matthieu Lesnoff <matthieu.lesnoff at cirad.fr> and Renaud Lancelot <renaud.lancelot at cirad.fr> Maintainer: Renaud Lancelot <renaud.lancelot at cirad.fr> Depends: R (>=

Information on package 'aod' Description: Package: aod Version: 1.1-2 Date: 2005-06-08 Title: Analysis of Overdispersed Data Author: Matthieu Lesnoff <matthieu.lesnoff at cirad.fr> and Renaud Lancelot <renaud.lancelot at cirad.fr> Maintainer: Renaud Lancelot <renaud.lancelot at cirad.fr> Depends: R (>=

Hi Chris, I can reproduce with your zone. Thanks! Best, Jeroen On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:07 +0000, Chris LaVallee wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > Attached is the zone I used. Did you add the record for a.bar ? > > > Ex: > > > a.bar ? 300 ? ? IN ?NS ? ? ?ns.somewhere.net. > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > >

thanks a lot Renaud. but i was interested in Finney's fiducial confidence intervals of LD50 so to obtain comparable results with SPSS. But your reply leads me to the next question: does anybody know what is the best method (asymptotic, bootstrap etc.) for calculating confidence intervals of LD50? i could "get rid" of Finney's fiducial confidence intervals but

Am 25.02.2016 um 03:25 schrieb Chandler Carruth: > I just want to clarify in case anyone is confused: I am in no way > suggesting that we would use pull requests, issues, or anything else as > part of the workflow for the test suite. I'm fine if folks want to talk > about that later, but I really view it as a separate discussion. Hm... then I guess I am confused about that

Hi Chris, I've properly started looking into this yesterday. NSD definitely shouldn't crash, still working on that. However, the provided zone is invalid too(?) I'm not the foremost expert on NSEC3 (or even DNSSEC), but is seems an NSEC3 is missing for bar.foo.com. Empty non-terminals should still have an NSEC3 RR. (Of course, the delegation point should be at bar.foo.com. too and

Please reply to: lancelot at sentoo.sn because my address: renaud.lancelot at cirad.fr is broken (should be fixed soon...). platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status Patched major 1 minor 5.0 year 2002 month 05 day 15 language R

Hi, I found a reproducible seg fault with a DNSSEC signed zone and overlapping config. I'm running NSD 4.10.1. Here's how to reproduce. 2 zones in nsd.conf: zone: name: "foo.com." zonefile: "/zones/foo.com.zone.signed" zone: name: "bar.foo.com." zonefile: "/zones/bar.foo.com.zone" Zone files:

Hi, though I am not sure this is the right place to ask, but I just try. I am looking for a better e-mail hoster providing me with a dovecot server (I don't want to do all the admin stuff and backup myself, if possible). I already googled a bit, searched the archives and had a look at dovecot.org but could not find an answer to this question. Since dovecot seems to get a fair amount of