similar to: CBQ and/or HTB help needed

Hi ; MY script: tc-htb3 qdisc del dev eth2 root ipchains -F tc-htb3 qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 10: htb default 20 r2q 40 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10: classid 10:1 htb rate 50Mbit burst 2000 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:100 htb rate 12mbit ceil 50mbit prio 1 tc-htb3 class add dev eth2 parent 10:1 classid 10:20 htb rate 38mbit ceil 50Mbit prio 8 ipchains

Hello all, this is my first post here. Sorry for my english. Gentoo LAN router, 2.4.26-hardened-r2 There are 2 WAN links, one LAN link. I am doing some iptables/routing/tc magic in my scripts. What''s interesting is marking packets traveling from all IP''s in LAN. Interesting commands are: ------------- for ip in `seq 50`; do $IPTABLES -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth2 -d

Hello Everybody, I am successful in throttling down the Bandwidth to 8kbit using HTB. Below that I get report to change r2q. I want to bring down the Leaf class Bandwidth to 3kbit. My script is as below: Tc Script to throttle down the Bandwidth to 8kbit based on MAC address and IP address tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 30 r2q 1 tc class add

Since shapecfg is no longer part of the distro what are people using in place of cbq to limit/throttle bandwidth? I have an ftp mirror that, if left unchecked, will suck up the entire bandwidth of the CoLo site. TIA, Joe -- My Useless Vanity Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other useless junk

Hi, I''m getting this warning/error in /var/log/messages: May 26 18:21:05 mail kernel: HTB: quantum of class 10010 is small. Consider r2q change. Its a big deal? What should I do? Many thanks Oliver -- Oliver Schulze L. <oliver@samera.com.py>

hi. When I execute follow class setting qdisc 1:0 root htb default 2 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 10Mbit ceil 10Mbit parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 10kbit ceil 100Mbit HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. <7>htb*g j=1014xxxxx HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

Hello all, First off, please let me apologize for cross posting this in both the fedora and centos lists. I have just run into a problem with imap that's becoming a real issue. About two or three days ago some of the mail folders became unusable/unreadable. For instance, my inbox shows 41 unread messages when I access it through pine on the server. But if I imap into it from

Salut lartc (lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl), 18:12:52 kernel HTB init, kernel part version 3.10 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100001 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100002 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100003 is small. Consider r2q change. 18:12:52 kernel HTB: quantum of class 100004 is small. Consider r2q change.

OK, finally I have made cbq run ! now I would like to know if it is posible to limit a range of IP to a speed. something like this : from 192.168.1.1 to 192.168.1.21 limit to 128K I don''t whant to limit each IP to 128K, what I would like to do is limit all 20 IP to have a max of 128K. Is it posible?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, what''s the diferences between HTB and CBQ? Bye - -- ======================================== Netsite S/A - Security Officer Profissional Certificado Conectiva Linux www.kidmumu.com.br - UIN 4553082 ======================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see

Hi, I am looking working (!) qdisc that would guarantee preferential treatment to priority (ex voice traffic). It is supposed to work as LLQ (Cisco) which means it is PQ but with bandwidth limited for EF PHB traffic. I did lots of tests with CBQ and prio set to 1 for EF PHB and prio 2 for best effort. Although delay does not look like being guaranteed at all for priority traffic. Eventually I

Hi everyone, This is on a linux box, ingress (eth1) at 100Mb/s and egress (eth0) at 10Mb/s. The purpose is to test CBQ Here is my script ------------------------------------------------------------------- # Root qdisc tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \ avpkt 1000 cell 8 # Classes tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 9Mbit \ rate 5Mbit weight

Hi all, Can anyone in this mailing list answer a few theoretical question which r confusing me. Here is the scenario I have a total Bandwidth of 2Mbps for a private LAN I am managing. I am using cbq standard script available online and for controlling bandwidth, squid and iptables. I have diff. packages for client. One: server own services access (unlimited bandwidth means no delays or

Hi, In my LAN Iam trying to make following setup: - All the traffic generated by 10.0.2.1 should go to 10.0.2.11, If the destination of this traffic is internet than it should be placed on its interface eth1. Outgoing traffic on eth1 should be shaped.For this I am using fw filters and cbq. _______ 10.0.2.1 -------> 10.0.2.11(eth0 )----| A

Which diference of I to use the CBQ and the HTB? I need priority a many ports.. same ports are 5060(voip),25(mail) and 3128(squid) It''s a my example off cbq arquive : DEVICE=eth0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=500Kbit WEIGHT=50Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=:5060 BOUNDED=yes ISOLATED=yes I need specific a rate or is not!? Igor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list

Hi, my name is Raymond, and I want to install HTB and CBQ on my fedora core 3. can someone tell me how to install HTB and CBQ? And, where can I find a step by step configuration way to install both of them? Thx.

Hello, I''am successful using a linux (2.4.20) bridge and the cbq.init_v0.7 script for traffic shaping. But I can only use the queuing discipline tbf (LEAF=tbf). If I try use queuing discipline sfq or none then tc applies the rules but no shaping occurs. Is this problem a normal behavior when using bridging ? I tried to use htb.init (using patched tc binary). It accepts the rules but

imq and htb are used to control traffic. #tc qdisc add dev imq0 root handle 1: htb default 0 #tc class add dev $IMQDEV parent 1: classid 1:1 htb \ rate 10000kbps ceil 10000kbps burst 15k I get the following messages: HTB quantum of class 1001 is big.consider r2q change <7>htb*g j=4129006 what is the reasonable range of rate ,or I have to set which parameter to set rate up to 10M(even

Dear All, Sorry to trouble again..... After go through www.lartc.org I have implemented the HTB instead of CBQ for the same scenario. Now following files are under /etc/sysconfig/htb directory. eth0 DEFAULT=30 R2Q=10 eth0-2.root RATE=256kbps BURST=25k eth0-2:10.comp1 RATE=120kbps BURST=12k PRIO=0 LEAF=sfq RULE=192.168.200.0/24 eth0-2:20.comp2