similar to: Asterisk and RT

Greetings, I had been working on Asterisk (http://asteriskpbx.org) about 2 years ago . http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0210/0107.html Last night with the help of Jesse's rt-soap-server.pl (and some prodding) I implemented a much cleaner, more repeatable * -> RT phone gateway with some notes: http://megaglobal.net/docs/asterisk/html/rtasterisk.html Questions or comments

Hi, Just wondering about using Asterisk for hosting a support line with a few distributed operators taking calls. My idea was for the calling party to be prompted for their support number (maybe a unique 4 digit number) this would then get looked up in a database and then place a pop up on the operators screen with details of the caller. I'm guessing that sort of thing is being done a lot,

This message is in response to Flash operator problem. My op_server.pl seems to be same. I also created the variable.txt to the /var/www/html/panel folder and when I run htt://192.168.0.0/panel it just says at the bottom transferring data. I don't see anything on the screen. I also checked my manager.conf file. I was able to telnet into the manager interface and it's running fine. So I am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Does anyone has experience with Deltas UPSs? I have fresh install of two RT-6ks (http://www.deltapowersolutions.com/pl-pl/mcis/5kva-10kva-single-phase-u ps-rt-series-specifications.php) in parallel witch legacy snmp cards and looking for best monitoring and maintenance solution. Stock software looks quite nice but not very functional on linux

Folks, I realised there's a "checkout_compiler_rt" option on ClangBuilder, which does checkout the sources, but couldn't build them on ARM. I also don't build them during releases (yet) because the configure script doesn't prepare the Makefiles for compiler-rt. A while ago I got it running on ARM with CMake files, but since these are buildbots, I'm not sure

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev < > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:26 PM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com > >

I'm running into a compile problem with commit 131656 of compiler-rt. I'm compiling llvm with: $ CXX='g++ -m32' CC='gcc -m32' CFLAGS=-m32 CXXFLAGS=-m32 LDFLAGS=-m32 ./configure --disable-bindings --{build,host,target}=i686-apple-darwin --enable-targets=x86,x86_64,cbe --enable-optimized $ make $ make install It will eventually error out with:

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Alexey Samsonov via cfe-dev < > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10,

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:45 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 10,

On 28 May 2014 17:44, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > In the autoconf system, I'm pretty sure compiler-rt's build is triggered > by a Makefile in clang, tools/clang/runtime/compiler-rt/Makefile. This > Makefile comments "We currently only try to generate runtime libraries > on x86", so I guess that's the place to start if you want to get it

Sorry, lost track of this thread. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:45 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>

Lei, The issues that you’re reporting here are on my mind. I have a patch out for review now (http://reviews.llvm.org/D19742 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D19742>) that allows building builtins without a full toolchain. One of the next steps after this is to support alternate sysroots for different targets, and to identify builtins that need target headers so that they can be excluded in cases

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:11 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:45 AM, David Blaikie via cfe-dev < >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at

where can I get the 2.05 firmware all i see is the 2.04 firmwares :-) also anyone got a fix for the horrible speaker phone on the 200's

> I really like the property of libFuzzer living in its own place so that > it's easy to use without building the world But it’s not: the implementation of the coverage instrumentation is done in one of the sanitizers, so it’s impossible to just use libFuzzer without them. Furthermore, I would think that almost all libFuzzer users would use a sanitizer while fuzzing. I can see a few

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Alexey Samsonov via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:50 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Alexey Samsonov via cfe-dev < >> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> I mostly agree with what

I have been running a Smart-UPS RT 3000 VA using nut successfully over the 940-0095B cable for a couple of years. I have just received a second unit, but it is slightly different in 3 ways that I have found so far. 1. It's a Smart-UPS RT 3000 XL 2. The 940-0095B cable now uses an RJ45 connector at the UPS end. 3. It now requires a baud rate of 9600 instead of the 2400 used previously.

The trouble is that the sanitizer tests are not really compiler-rt tests. The original compiler-rt tests are, but not the sanitizer tests. The sanitizer tests are "compiler-rt tests via clang". The sanitizer runtime is a C++ library requiring only a C++ compiler to build it (and to *unit* test it). The ASan lit tests, however, require clang, because they are testing those C++

Hi All, Wonder if any of you guys can help troubleshoot the following for me. What I''m trying to achieve is: 1) Perl web service, using SOAP::Lite (server) 2) Ruby web service consumer, using SOAP::RPC::DRIVER (client) My problem is, if my client and server are both Perl based, the output is as expected. However, if the client is Ruby based (haven''t tried another

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:26 PM, George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> > wrote: > >> From my understanding, all these problems can be solved entirely >> > by moving libfuzzer to compiler-rt, where (other) sanitizers already >> reside. >> >