similar to: Non standard usage of X100P card.

I was wondering if the accountcode flag works with sip channels. I was looking into the debug and ,even if I have the line accountcode=XXX into the users sections of my sip.conf, I don't see it logged into the cdr. Matteo Brancaleoni mbrancaleoni@espia.it Emmegi System Administrator EspiA - EMMEGI Srl - e*solution provider Uffici: Via Pascoli, 37 20129 Milano - Italy Sede Legale: Corso

Hi, I'm trying to set up an Asterisk pbx based on a Fedora Core 1 Linux box (customized kernel version 2.4.24). I want calls from my SIP soft-phones to simply be dumped onto the PSTN line via a BRI (EuroISDN). I have a cheap HFC-S based PCI ISDN card connected to the NT1+ interface, so I need zaphfc. I've read everything I've found at www.voip-info.org, then I've downloaded the

I have a couple of X100P's in my system and while on calls they just randomly hang up for no reason. I have tried messing with the busydetect and callprogress setting them to yes and no same and still random hangups. Is there another setting I should be looking at? My zap config looks like. context = inbound-work include => extensions signalling

Hi, First of all I am not sure that what I am trying to do is correct/supported, but here is what I'm trying to test: Some of my endpoints only have g723 codecs. Because of this I am only allowing g723.1 codec in sip.conf and h323.conf. Calls between endpoints work fine. I am trying to configure voicemail and meetme applications. I see that all voice files in asterisk are in gsm format and

On 03/15/2018 01:32 PM, Fedor Sergeev via llvm-dev wrote: > For this to be really usable in this setup we need additionally to: >   - extend -print-module-scope to cover basic block passes >   - introduce a clear way to separate module IRs as those are being > printed by -print-after-all > > But yes, it should work, and a wrapper that pipes to git fast-import > seems to be

Does git-commit-after-all print correctly after all the passes? Maybe I messed it up and it skip some passes, therefore having less to do? Either that, or piping has a higher cost than writing to file. Looks like it surprisingly spends much less time in system more when going through file. Maybe that's because the file is consistently around the same size and is mmapped into memory

The print-module-after-all type of option exists in upstream: -print-module-scope - When printing IR for print-[before|after]{-all} always print a module IR commit 7d160f714357f6784ead669ce516e94991c12e5a Author: Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com<mailto:fedor.sergeev at azul.com>> Date: Fri Dec 1 17:42:46 2017 +0000 IR

Is there a reason for why `-asan` and `-asan-module` can be mixed but Function passes and Module passes with the new PM can't be mixed? - Leo On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 3:21 AM Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com> wrote: > > On 09/27/2018 12:25 PM, Philip Pfaffe wrote: >> >> `opt < %s -passed='asan' -asan-module -S` > > asan-module is another

Hmm... I tried Alexandre's fix from D44244 and surprisingly it appears that just using -print-module-scope w/o any additional git actions is waaaay slower on my testcase than -git-commit-module-all. Hell, even a plan -print-after-all is slower:  ] time R/bin/opt -O3 some-ir.ll -disable-output -git-commit-after-all 2>/dev/null real    0m8.041s user    0m7.133s sys     0m0.936s ] time

For this to be really usable in this setup we need additionally to:   - extend -print-module-scope to cover basic block passes   - introduce a clear way to separate module IRs as those are being printed by -print-after-all But yes, it should work, and a wrapper that pipes to git fast-import seems to be the best way to handle it. regards,   Fedor. On 03/15/2018 12:31 AM, Daniel Neilson via

Huh. Great! 😁 I don't believe my poor excuse from earlier (else we should map all pipes into files!), but I'm curious why we spend less time in system mode when going through file than pipe. Maybe /dev/null is not as efficient as we might think? I can't believe I'm saying that... On Thu, Mar 15, 2018, 08:25 Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com> wrote: > Well, git by

<P>hi,</P> <P>Can anybody pls tell me how to activate loggin CDR on mysql db. I tried&nbsp;editing the /etc/asterisk/cdr_mysql.conf file and recompiling asterisk, it didn't work. Normal loggin on Master.csv file works fine.</P> <P>Thank you inadvance,</P> <P>Surajee</P> <P>&nbsp;</P><br> --------------This mail sent

Hello Fedor. Thank you for the information. I made a simple patch that exposes PassInstrumentationCallback so llvmGetPassPluginInfo can use it: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71086 . Would this change make sense? Thanks, Juneyoung Lee On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:44 AM Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com> wrote: > > > On 12/3/19 8:01 PM, Juneyoung Lee via llvm-dev wrote: > >

Hi. Has anyone experienced with the new firmware .77 ? There's Day Light Saving time now, but haven't time to play with it, till now. Matteo. -- Matteo Brancaleoni Espia System Administrator - IT services Website : http://www.espia.it Email : mbrancaleoni@espia.it

git-commit-after-all solution has one serious issue - it has a hardcoded git handling which makes it look problematic from many angles (picking a proper git, selecting exact way of storing information, creating repository, replacing the file etc etc). Just dumping information in a way that allows easy subsequent machine processing seems to be a more flexible, less cluttered and overall clean

Overall seems fine to me. On 3/11/19 8:12 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: > Here's a revised approach based on the discussion: > > - Cache PSI right after the profile summary in the IR is written in > the pass pipeline. This would avoid the need to insert > RequireAnalysisPass for PSI before each non-module pass that needs it. > PSI can be technically invalidated but unlikely

On 8/6/19 7:31 PM, Fedor Sergeev via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On 8/6/19 3:02 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi via llvm-dev wrote: >> I had a chance to try -print-after-all with NPM. >> >> It seems like there's still no output for the passes >> before objc-arc-contract (which is basically what I saw before.) Does >> anyone else see this? >> >> Are we

On 06/13/2018 09:13 PM, Philip Pfaffe wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:03 PM David A. Greene via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com > <mailto:fedor.sergeev at azul.com>> writes: > > >> Ok.  The way I envision this working from a user

Hi, I want to give a summary or anova for "arima" model in R, as "summary", and "anova" for "lm". As including various intervention factors in arima(xreg = ) part, I want to assess the significancy of thse factors. I can do it using interrupted analysis of time series by linear regression, but want to see whether arima model works for the data first.

On 8/7/19 6:20 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: > I basically run "clang > -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -print-after-all ..." > > It's conceivable that something is different in our setup or in clang > (from opt)... I'll see if I can reproduce it outside our setup. Does it depend on machine architecture? I generally use x86... regards,   Fedor. > > Thanks.