similar to: which DB to use? or Why Berkley DB vs. MySQL, etc

Hello, Here http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+database , you can read: "Also, since it's a normal Berkely db1 (version185) file its contents can be viewed/dumped with the standard *db1_dump185* tool. Thus db1_dump185 -p /var/lib/asterisk/astdb will show the complete database tree." Where can this db1_dump185 be found using Debian packages ? Regards -------------- next

Hello, I would like to experiment with Xen some to see how I could integrate it in my various web application environments and hopefully make my life easier. I am currently using FreeBSD 6 but it seems that it doesn''t fully support Xen. I did some searching around and also notice some posts on mailing lists mentioning some trouble with the CentOS 4 distribution (something about the

Hi All, as a CCNA student and wishing to eventualy do CCSP, I wanted to learn all about what hackers use/do to infiltrate networks, and was introduced to dsniff at a Linux meeting, TLUG, in Tokyo, but, am having problems installing it. Please see below. checking for Berkeley DB with 1.85 compatibility... /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.4 configure: error: db_185.h or libdb.a not found in

Hi there, I want to add 4000 Callerids and Callernames to my asterisk-db. (/var/lib/asterisk/astdb) I do not want an external database or an sql-database because I do not want asterisk to depend on external processes. However, when I do 4000 "database put number name" via a shellscript and "asterisk -rx" I only have 600 entries later in my asterisk- database. The asterisk

I sent this question to the OpenLDAP list yesterday, but I still haven't seen the message come across the list. I am asking here in the hopes of getting a faster response. I am trying to compile OpenLDAP 2.3.11 from source on CentOS4. I have the rpm for db4-4.2.52-7.1 installed and also a source build of BerkeleyDB in /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.4. How do I get OpenLDAP to link with the bdb

Hi All We want to use rsync to backup a live Berkley db to a remote site. BDB has a requirement that read has to be in the unit of db page size. So wonder how could we make sure that rsync can follow that? If we need to change the code, where we should begin to look at? Thanks! Ming

Hi! I'm trying to use dovecot-1.1.5 with Berkley DB 4.6.21 on OpenBSD. While compiling I get this: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-sql \ -DPKG_RUNDIR=\""/var/run/dovecot"\" -I/usr/local/include -std=gnu99\ -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations \ -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast \

Hello, i've been here with this poblem before, now i installed the berkley db4 in /usr. But now it report another error, still at the same file. Please reply if you think you know the reason... I'm still running 4.6-STABLE, and would soon like the new 4.8-STABLE kernel made. Regards, Johan Christiansen _________ ===> vesa rm -f setdef0.c setdef1.c setdefs.h setdef0.o setdef1.o vesa.ko

On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 20:57, Chris Lattner wrote: > > (b) move the CVS repository somewhere that doesn't have the University's > > restrictions. That last option, however, may have additional > > intellectual property issues. > > I don't think that there would be IP issues: LLVM is (effectively) BSD > licensed, so it could be forked at any time without a

Yes, I am sure but added another broader rule: nsasia at db1:~$ sudo ufw allow from any port 655 proto udp same result for debug example. regards Robert >>> Rafael Wolf <rfwolf at gmail.com> 13-Jun-18 5:32 PM >>> Telnet will only do tcp not udp which tinc works on. Are you sure udp 655 is open? On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 3:51 AM Robert Horgan <robert

Hi, Are you sure? What happens if you manually telnet/socket 10.130.39.180 nsasia at web3:~$ telnet 10.130.39.180 655 Trying 10.130.39.180... Connected to 10.130.39.180. Escape character is '^]'. 0 db1 17 Connection closed by foreign host. Stopping the service and running debug I get: nsasia at web3:~$ sudo tincd -n gainplus -d5 -D tincd 1.0.33 starting, debug level 5

# Just when I thought I had the basic stuff mastered.... # This has been quite perplexing, thanks for any help ## Here's the example: db1=data.frame( olditems=c('soup','','','','nuts'), prices=c(4.45, 3.25, 4.42, 2.25, 3.98)) db2=data.frame( newitems=c('stew','crackers','tofu','goatsmilk','peanuts'))

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:59:56 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 14:55:24 +0200 > Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 > > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on

On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 12:51:33 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan]

Hi Rowland, On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:46:24 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: > > spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] > > account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] > > forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] > > > > At

Hello, I've got some log entries like these on our DCs: Failed to modify SPNs on CN=db1,CN=Computers,DC=mydom,DC=lan: acl: spn validation failed for spn[TERMSRV/DB1.MYDOM] uac[0x1000] account[db1$] hostname[(null)] nbname[mydom] ntds[(null)] forest[mydom.lan] domain[mydom.lan] At first I thought it was about missing SPN entries, but adding these did not resolve the problem: # samba-tool

Hi Jason, On 14/08/15 16:45, Jason Warr wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:31 +0100, Michael H wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> >>> Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel >>> parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? >>> >>> I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not

On 02/17/2016 07:08 AM, Michael H wrote: > On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what >> is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that >> needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list >> of updates. >> >> We released a new glibc yesterday for

On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: >> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >> >> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as >> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: >>

Does anyone know enough about the implementation of AstDB to know whether the data structure is a Hash function, a Balanced-Tree, a b-Tree, or a Linked List? I'm trying to estimate the lookup 'cost' of a AstDB with around 160,000 keys? Obviously I already know that it WILL WORK, but the question is whether the data structure is optimal in the Berkeley DB AS IMPLEMENTED in Asterisk.