similar to: Adding another channel to a Dial() already in progress

I believe you can assign processors in vmware, and xen as well. So you could probably do something funky like that to try to reduce load. The only thing that probably becomes difficult is trying to manage physical hardware between virtual machines. John -----Original Message----- From: Jim Van Meggelen [mailto:jim.vanmeggelen@coretel.ca] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 7:47 PM To:

Hi Kristian, Anywhere I can read about this Soekris/AstLinux project? ... Regards, Hans -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Kristian Kielhofner Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:02 AM To: jim@vanmeggelen.ca; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]

I would like to ask what people think the best way would be to build a low-power consumption, passively-cooled system. For example,one could use a fanless-Eden (mini-ITX/EPIA) system, but the loss of FPU power would limit performance. The obvious choice for FPU work are the Intels and AMDs, nut they're all power-hungry radiators. Is there something that can offer the quiet, power-savings of

Could anyone help me set up Asterisk in such a way that it makes SIP-SIP transfers using the REFER / NOTIFY method according to RFC-3515 ? SCANARIO: - Asterisk registers with PSTN<->SIP VoIP provider "V" (Vonage) as a friend - Asterisk is located in Europe, Vonage in located US. - Asterisk acts as an autoattendant located in Europe. - Asterisk answers and incoming call from

Hi List, We have a remote asterisk SIP phone at the cottage. I'd like it to have minimal privileges when it first registers with Asterisk. Ideally it should be in a restricted context. Dialing any number would intercept the call and tell the person to log on. This way, if the phone was stolen or someone got into the cottage, we wouldn't have a bunch of surprise charges on our phone

$B$3$l$O<+F01~Ez$G$9(B. $B4IM}%"%I%l%9(B <cottage-request@eg.e-cell.org> $B7PM3$G(B Mailman $B$K(B $BAw$C$?%a!<%k%3%^%s%I$KLdBj$,$"$j$^$9(B. $B@5$7$$(B Mailman $B$N(B Email $B%3%^%s%I$N;H$$J}$K$D$$$F$O!$(B"help" $B$r%a!<%k$N7oL>$+K\J8$KF~$l$F(B <cottage-request@eg.e-cell.org> $B$X(B $BAw$C$F2<$5$$!%(B

So I have whose autoattendant is colliding with their extensions... Quick fix anyone? Second someone presses say a person's extension (101) ... Autoattendant sends them to the first context... [companyx-main-aa] exten => s,1,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,2,Background(silence/10) exten => s,3,Background(companyx/companyx-main) exten => s,4,Background(silence/10)

I have been investigating more tight integration between * and the Nortel MICS... it appears that it is at least theoretically possible to have * store voicemail and log which stations call where. Both require a T1 card. The T1 card requires either a clocking module or the 6-port fiber module to provide T1 timing. Naturally a T100P or TE405P is required on the * side. To log which

Hi, At my house, I have two POTS lines. Both are connected to my * server on a TDM400P card. As an example, say the phone numbers are (919)555-1212 and (919)555-1213. I also have four SIP extensions, an ATA with a fax machine, and a DID coming in from an ITSP. I have an autoattendant configured that talks and allows users to forward to the extension they choose, but my family doesn't like

Consider this dialplan fragment, where the call is being dialed into [macro-process-routing] over an iax2 channel from another (same build) Asterisk server: [macro-process-routing] ; This is the entrypoint of the debug call but is also refered to by Macro(process-routing) elsewhere in the dialplan ; XXX-NNN-6800 exten => _6800,1,Macro(6800-interceptor) ; This is matched when 8 is

All, Has anyone ever seen a problem where the autoattend detects the first digit twice? What I am seeing is this: My extensions are 421-468. When a caller calls in and dials exten 433 from the autoattendant, they get exten 443. This is happen for any extension that is valid in the 44x range (i.e. 42x -> 442, 43x -> 443, 44x -> 444, etc.). I am seeing this problem about 1/3 of the

I've spent the past several weeks reading up and playing around with Asterisk while I've been waiting for an ISDN card I got on ebay to arrive so I can really get to business. I'd just like to run my project ideaa by some of you to hopefully get a little feedback. I aplogize if this ends up being a somewhat long message. In the Marine Corps we've somewhat recently started using

Hi: Which was released for free download under a Creative Commons license for "The Future of Telephony, by Leif Madsen, Jared Smith, and Jim Van Meggelen". Regards. --------------------------------- Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm trying to get into the world of Asterisk in order to use the voicemail and autoattendat features (and more stuff later) with a Redcom switch. But, I've only started and haven't gotten to that yet. At this point my solitary goal is to talk to the autoattendant via an SIP phone (SJPhone). I've spent countless hours trying to find the documentation I need to accomplish my goals

Hello Fellow Users, This is my first post so please be kind :-) I am using asterisk@home <mailto:asterisk@home> with freePBX talking to an Alcatel 2400 analogue port via a Digium TDM01B - 1 FXO card I can make calls into the asterisk by dialling the asterisk extn number from the 4200. I can dial extns on the 4200 from asterisk by dialling 9(4200extn number) if I don't have any

On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 05:26, jim@digitalchemy.ca wrote: > In light of the fact that Asterisk v1 is now a reality, I feel that we would serve our > readers well by eliminating the whole CVS discussion and referring them to FTP > instead. > > CVS is for development, FTP is for distributing the finished product. > > Makes sense, no? [moved over to -users] Absolutely and how

[Apologies in advance for the train of thought prose, but it is brainstorming after all…] I'm going to focus on self-descriptive names rather than literary or fantasy references… Advanced Compiler Kit, affectionately known as “ACK!”? It has an ill- deserved nod to NeXT, even. (Completely the wrong language, after all.) Core Compiler? Heh, I don't think that'd get past certain

Hi, I setup asterisk as an autoattendant. When I call using IAX I get the autoattendent okay, but when I dial one of the extensions, there is no ringing sound passed back to the caller. It happens when I use my DID number, but I also configured a context so I can get it to happen with Firefly (iax client) as the caller. It seems that once the Answer command is executed in the dialplan, status

Anyone in the Toronto area interested in getting together to share notes and swap war stories? -- Jim Van Meggelen jim@vanmeggelen.ca -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 06/01/2005

Jared Smith, Jim van Meggelen, and Leif Madsen of the Asterisk Documentation Project, in conjunction with O'Reilly Media are pleased to announce the official release of Asterisk: The Future of Telephony on Friday, October 14, 2005 at AstriCon 2005 in Anaheim, CA. In the true spirit of Open Source, the authors and O'Reilly Media have published the book under the open, Creative Commons