similar to: dropping g729 frames

We have one Swissvoice IP10S running SIP firmware. Recently, I've been getting these messages: Mar 1 13:59:44 NOTICE[20933]: frame.c:128 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Any clues off the bat? I'm still researching other stuff.. Thanks, Matthew

Here is the setup: Phone -SIP G729-> AsteriskA -IAX G729-> AsteriskB -SIP G729-> Carrier The call completes but AsteriskA prints on the screen a ton of those "Dropping Frame of G729" messages starting about 5 seconds into the call: Jun 10 11:17:14 NOTICE[14277]: frame.c:135 __ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Jun

hello, anyone that know about this asterisk's message: frame.c:128 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Best REgards Ever -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060602/ea4abe0c/attachment.htm

Just shoved my 7960 onto one of my clients networks. I'm talking from outside the office to them (they are using a GS BT101). I'm getting the following message repeatedly in the log, whenever someone talks. Jul 17 12:29:40 NOTICE[96402352]: frame.c:120 ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Both phones are set to use the G729

Hi, My setup is SIP Call-->Asterisk-->VSP1 or VSP2 or VSP3 I'm experiencing an interconnect issue with one of the VSP's that seems to have to do with Asterisk not having any VAD control. The error is: NOTICE[10989]: frame.c:203 __ast_smoother_feed: Dropping extra frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end The VSP has switched off silence suppression on their

Hi, Do the g729 codec licenses for Asterisk work on a SIP environment (only SIP UAs running g729 + Asterisk)? I would like to buy a couple for a SIP test lab but I have not found any documentation on wether it works for SIP UAs or not. The Digium page only mentions: "The G.729 codec works with all Digium cards." Can somebody tell me please? Thanks, Ricardo Villa

Per my conversation below with digium, are there any legal alternatives to digium's G729? It is out of date, and doesn't support VAD nor silence detection. Digium has stated that they have no plans to update it anytime soon. VAD/Silence is a big deal with major carriers and we are having to fight a battle to get them to make special arrangements to turn off VAD/Silence in their

Hello, We are in the process of debugging a voice quality issue for a client of ours that is a VoIP services provider. The client uses a softphone that runs on a pjsip stack. When placing a call using the softphone, it negotiates the use of G729 codec with the remote endpoint (ptime = 20ms). The endpoint transmits RTP packets with encoded G729 payload. VAD/DTX is enabled. We see that the last

I have this showing on my cli while being in a call. Then connection gets broken. Can someone tell me what it means ? Dropping frame of G.729 since we already have a VAD frame at the end Thank you in advance. Bartosz

Hi I seem to have installed the G729 codec properly but can't seem to get it to work .. in the Asterisk startup I see .. [codec_g729b.so] => (Annex B (floating point) G.729/PCM16 Codec Translator) == Detected 1 licensed G.729 transcoders WARNING[1074408160]: File translate.c, Line 218 (calc_cost): Translator 'g729tolinb' does not produce sample frames. == Registered translator

Hello! I am wondering how the differences between G729, G729a, and G729b effect call bridging and server interoperability. For example, can one server use the G729 code with another server that uses the G729A codec? Also, which version is Asterisk set up to use? Thanks! Elliot

Hello... I'm having problems with H323/G729 setup. Below is the output of h.323 debug when making a call. I use a SIP phone connected to an * box in the same LAN. The * connects to a h323/g729 PSTN terminator through internet. Calls rings and are answered in the other side, but I get no sound at all nor the other side does (complete silence in both sides). I thought this would just happen

Hi all, We are an ISP in Switzerland and we propose VoIP with Asterisk. Everything works perfectly for all clients but one. In a conversation, they have no sound during 2 to 8 seconds using the G729 codec (I didn't make the test with G711). The Client configuration is perfect (QoS and bandwidth management). Do you know some issues with the G729 codec? Thanks a lot for your comments, Thomas

Assuming I've got a setup where calls entering Asterisk on SIP leave on IAX2 ( and the reverse), i.e. a SIP user might dial '1234' where we then have extern => 1234,1,Dial(IAX2/somewhereelse) Now, we don't have any G.729 functionality on this server, so what happens if the SIP user calls with G.729 only available? Assuming the remote IAX2 server does have G.729 can it be

List, I purchased 2 g729 licenses but I can't get it to answer a g729 call from a cisco router with a vwic card. In the debug output below you will see that asterisk thinks it only supports: (gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263) when it should support g729 according to the config also listed below. The real odd thing is I can place g729 calls to the router, just not from the router to *. Anyone have any

Hi, I have trouble re-registering a G729 license for Asterisk (bought 6 years ago) My license looks like: 10D2XXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXXX Tried to re-register the codec according to the http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/README document, but the register failed with this error message: You selected 5, G.729 Codec Please enter your Key-ID:

I've done some reviewing of the archives for G729 and H323 experiences. The landscape of that query isn't pretty - lots of pleas for help, and nor do I see too many "answers." I have a pending bid that requires some data before I can implement * on this particular solution. My question is perhaps a slightly differently worded one than has been asked before, but it may be

B. Mitchell Loebel a ?crit : > Thank you. You're right ... my error ... I meant to say 12 bytes > (including the 2 bytes for VAD). And it is 10ms/frame. No matter ... > thank you for the SPEEX specs. In terms of quality, what SPEEX bit rate > compares with G.729 at 8kbps data rate please? Haven't done formal testing and it depends on whether it's G.729 or G.729A. I'd

I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an experiment to find the answer... I understand that in a SIP call where G729 has been negotiated as the preferred codec, a G.729 licence is not consumed until there is a need to perform transcoding, e.g. play a non-g729 sound, or do voicemail, or enter a Meetme, etc. What happens when a SIP call in progress

Thank you Jean-Marc. My understanding is that G.729 is a telephone codec, so there must have been some reason why its developers went to 10ms/frame. Do you know why that might be? From a recent post on this list I saw somebody talking about your decoded sample rate being 8KHZ/sec. and then he mentioned that being 160 bytes at 20ms/frame. That said, I take it that your decoded samples are