similar to: Wildcard DNS

I have bind running on two servers. Both servers are running bind-9.2.4-7. When I update a zone file on the primary and reload bind, the secondary receives a notify, but does not initiate an AXFR. The only way I can get the secondary to update is to delete the zone file on the secondary and restart named. Any ideas what might be wrong? Mike

Hello, I know this is off-topic for this list but I know someone here may be able to help me out of a jam. I ran the following against a table: ALTER TABLE `products` ADD INDEX `idx_products_model` ( `products_model` ); Some things now appear broken but don't know if this was the culprit or not. If I can revert it back it its original state I may be able to determine if it's the cause

Hello everyone - I run bind version 9.8.2 on CentOS 6.5. The daily logwatch run sends me the following items. Are any of these a real problem? ============ checkhints: extra NS 'A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s) checkhints: extra NS 'C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET' in hints: 170 Time(s)

I just upgraded one of my boxes to CentOS 3.5 and for some reason, httpd won't start now. It acts like it's going to, but the process just dies. I can't find anything in my logs that would indicate a problem: >From /var/log/messages Jun 10 00:16:53 austin httpd: httpd shutdown failed Jun 10 00:16:54 austin httpd: httpd startup succeeded >From /var/log/httpd/error_log [Fri

All: I'm posting this to FreeBSD-security (rather than FreeBSD-net) because the problems I'm seeing appear to have been caused by spyware, and because they constitute a possible avenue for denial of service on FreeBSD machines with default installs of the operating system. Several of the FreeBSD machines on our network began to act strangely during the past week. Some have started to

I just installed a fresh 3.3 system (because those are the ISO's I had on hand). Upon running yum update, it starts to download headers and then stalls. I hit Ctl-C and it continues to download about 4-5 more headers and stalls. I hit Ctl-C again and it pulls a few more headers. Anyone seen this and/or know how to fix it? TIA Mike

I am about to lease another server to be a backup web/mail server with a replicated mysql database. The current live server is a dual Xeon 2.8Ghz. Would I do better to get another Xeon server or an Opteron based server? My concerns are compatibility of the database and the SSL certificate currently running on the Xeon machine. Are these concerns unfounded? TIA Mike

What KVMs do you use? I personally like the ConnectPro.

I'm trying to create pdf's on the fly with php, but I'm getting errors such as: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: pdf_new() I tried installing pdflib from dag, but I think I'm missing something to plug it into php. Has anyone done this? Mike

Has anyone ever mounted their /var/lib/mysql on a tmpfs or ramfs? Are there any performance gains to be made doing this? TIA

Hello, we're using sambas internal DNS server. Is there a way to get rid of these messages in logfiles: /var/log/samba/log.samba: Not authoritative for 'static.ak.facebook.com', forwarding /var/log/samba/log.samba: Not authoritative for 's-static.ak.facebook.com', forwarding /var/log/samba/log.samba: Not authoritative for 's-static.ak.facebook.com', forwarding

hi guys, At the moment there is a www.centos.org site. There is also a wildcard dns setup that directs anything.centos.org to www.centos.org's content This has a couple of 'issues' with SEO and google sepcifically. The reason we have such low page rank is that google marks all of this as duplicate content. I am sure there are other search engines that do as well ( Bing has a

Hi, I'm running Samba4 as a PDC using the internal DNS. I want to add another domain, so I created one under forward zone (say example.com). However, if I add a cname test I can ping and resolve test.example.com, but I can't get it to work for just example.com. I tried adding an asterisk (*) but it won't resolve. Any idea how to get this to work? Obviously, this is only for internal

On 04/15/2016 04:36 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 4/15/2016 10:08 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: >> Hello, >> we're using sambas internal DNS server. >> >> Is there a way to get rid of these messages in logfiles: >> >> /var/log/samba/log.samba: Not authoritative for >> 'static.ak.facebook.com', forwarding >>

On 04/18/2016 07:09 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 4/18/2016 12:52 PM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: >> >> On 04/15/2016 04:36 PM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: >>> On 4/15/2016 10:08 AM, Johannes Amorosa | Celluloid VFX wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> we're using sambas internal DNS server. >>>> >>>> Is

Would prefer to continue to use my NSD/Unbound installs for most DNS (if not all) services. NSD is the authoritative server for the domain, and Unbound is the cache/resolver that the clients connect to. I'd like to not disturb this setup but I'll need the SRV records so that AD works. If the SRV records are fixed I suppose I could host them using NSD, then Samba wouldn't have to be

I have implemented a small local network. I use pfSense as Firewall and Gateway, I have all my servers inside a DMZ, except the domain controllers that are on the LAN. LAN: 10.10.20.0/24 DMZ: 10.10.30.0/24 DC1: 10.10.20.2 DC2: 10.10.20.3 pfSense: LAN: 10.10.20.1 WAN: x.x.x.x DMZ: 10.10.30.1 In my local network, I have 2 domain controllers with SAMBA4, I would like to find

Can the Samba internal DNS be set as authoritative only (not a resolver)? Can the Samba DNS server be set as authoritative only for the SRV zones (_tcp, _udp _msdcs, _sites) and not the parent zone? Thanks, Chris

> > I followed this url to set up Samba AD DC. > > https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18. > 04-samba-AD_DC.txt > > > > I do have it working. I am testing with a Windows 10 VM as a member > > of the domain. > > The machine joins the domain. Also, as administrator, I can create > > and enforce > > Group Policies. from

Greetings All- I have an odd need for a 'semi-authoritative' DNS server. Let's say I have a zone for 'domain.com' with public DNS servers. However, I wanted to run an internal DNS server for internal things. Public resolution of 'www.domain.com' would yield the public IPs, private resolution of 'www.domain.com' would yield the internal private IPs. Easy enough.