similar to: festival and gcc 3.3.2 (Fedora Core 1)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "festival and gcc 3.3.2 (Fedora Core 1)"

2012 Feb 21
5
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x86_64-debian-fnt
All, This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. They were probably caused by my commit: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines Changed paths: M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/LLVMContextImpl.h M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Type.cpp PR1210: make uniquing of struct and
2003 Jun 19
4
festival error
I followed the directions I found in the list to a tee http://www.marko.net/asterisk/archives/0209/0389.html The server starts fine, but when I call the festival extension it gives me an OID error variable tts_textasterisk I have RH7.3 festival 1.4.2 speech_tools 1.2.2 patched it with the festival-1.4.2.diff located in the /usr/src/asterisk/ folder . When I patched it, the patch was looking
2005 Jul 11
2
building packages on Windows
Hi, all, I just recently upgraded my computer though I'm using the same OS (XP). But now I'm having difficulty building packages and I cannot seem to solve the problem. I'm using R-2.1.1pat on Windows XP. Here is what I tried: D:\Users\sundard\slib\sundar\R>R CMD CHECK sundar * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory
2004 Jul 29
1
Asterisk and festival
I'm having trouble getting festival to work with asterisk. We are running debian (sarge) and got asterisk from CVS. Here's what I'm using as far as festival goes. Debian (Sarge) gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-3) Connected to Asterisk CVS-HEAD-07/28/04-21:08:19 festival-1.4.3-release.tar.gz speech-tools_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz I got patches for both of these. Speech tools
2007 Apr 20
2
Fastest way to repeatedly subset a data frame?
Hi - I have a data frame with a large number of observations (62,000 rows, but only 2 columns - a character ID and a result list). Sample: > my.df <- data.frame(id=c("ID1", "ID2", "ID3"), result=1:3) > my.df id result 1 ID1 1 2 ID2 2 3 ID3 3 I have a list of ID vectors. This list will have anywhere from 100 to 1000 members, and
2012 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x86_64-debian-fnt
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. > They were probably caused by my commit: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines > Changed paths: >
2005 May 12
2
[LLVMdev] Current Regressions
Dear All, Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed below. Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few days ago have been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all who've helped fix things. We would like to try to get as many of these fixed as possible before I create the release branch (still scheduled for tomorrow, Friday). I'll
2005 May 18
2
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the current > version just before you branched it passes gmake check and fails four > llvm-test tests: siod, SPASS, archie, and plot2fig. SPASS needs porting > work to compile correctly on FreeBSD. I haven't analyzed the other three > yet, but they weren't
2005 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] Current Regressions
On Thu, 12 May 2005, John Criswell wrote: > Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed below. > Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few days ago have > been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all who've helped fix things. > > We would like to try to get as many of these fixed as possible before I > create the release
2005 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
siod fails with gcc link errors: cannot find -ldl archie and plot2fig fail with gcc link errors: re_comp and re_exec are undefined Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the >> current version just before you branched it passes gmake check and >> fails four llvm-test tests:
2005 May 18
1
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > siod fails with gcc link errors: cannot find -ldl > archie and plot2fig fail with gcc link errors: re_comp and re_exec are > undefined Again, the reason that these are showing up is because I changed the makefiles. They were failing before, just not notifying us. If the native compiler fails, we have nothing to compare against. As such
2006 Aug 25
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-test and _setjmp
Hi, I'm trying to get the llvm-test suite going on Fedora Core 5 and I have a number of failures with the current HEAD. The major one (see PR879) has a workaround. Now, I'm getting a conflict in the CBakcned while compiling siod (and others): gcc Output/siod.cbe.c -lm -ldl -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -o Output/siod.cbe Output/siod.cbe.c:471: error: conflicting types for
2003 Oct 23
6
Festival on RH9?
I'm about to download Festival source, apply the astrisk diff's, and initiate basic testing. Thoughts are to download v1.4.3 (latest per the fesitval website. If anyone has an existing how-to, install notes, tips, or any suggestions I'd greatly appreciate it. Direct email is fine if you'd rather not post them. Thanks, Rich radamson@routers.com
2005 Jan 10
2
Festival Woes
Asterisk v1.0 is running on RH 9. I installed festival RPM (festival-1.4.2-16.i386.rpm) and edited the festival.scm file to add: (define (tts_textasterisk string mode) "(tts_textasterisk STRING MODE) Apply tts to STRING. This function is specifically designed for use in server mode so a single function call may synthesize the string. This function name may be added to the server safe
2005 May 17
4
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
Dear All, I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't have in house. I'm specifically looking for people who can do: Itanium FreeBSD/i386 Windows (Cygwin, MingW, etc) I'm mainly interested in major
2018 Jan 26
4
[RFC] Improving compact x86-64 compact unwind descriptors
Here is our proposal to extend/enhance the x86-64 compact unwind descriptors to fully describe the prologue/epilogue for asynchronous unwinding.  I believe there are missing/lacking CFI directives as well, but I'll save that for another thread. Asynchronous Compact Unwind Descriptors Ron Brender, VMS Software, Inc. Revised January 25, 2018 1  Introduction This document proposes means to
2006 Jul 07
4
Call R function from Java
Dear All, I need to call R functions from Java, I've read on the internet about JRI but there are no exemples, neither tutorials. I'm beginner in Java and in R, Could you please help me?? Thank you in advance, Xena --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Jun 28
1
Asterisk & Festival, not a happy couple
Hello, I'm in the process of trying to get Festival to work with Asterisk. I followed the install process at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+festival+installation. To get the Festival to compile I had to add the patch described in the comments. Once added, Festival and the Speech tools compiled without error. How ever, when ever I try to call the test extension, I get a busy
2005 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Testing Release 1.5
I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the current version just before you branched it passes gmake check and fails four llvm-test tests: siod, SPASS, archie, and plot2fig. SPASS needs porting work to compile correctly on FreeBSD. I haven't analyzed the other three yet, but they weren't failing two days earlier. John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, >
2018 Jan 29
2
[RFC] Improving compact x86-64 compact unwind descriptors
Hi Nick, It is a pleasure to be in contact with the creator of the compact unwind approach! I can see how an array of 32-bit unwind blocks could be used to describe each distinct point within a function (within a prolog in particular). But then you end up with six or seven or more such blocks for a large percentage of functions, don't you? Seems like a lot of additional space for something