similar to: centos plus kernel

Hello all, apologies if my question has an obvious answer or it's too naive (I sent this directly to Peter with the intent of not chocking the list with possibly ridicolous questions...). I just tried to build both syslinux-3.00 and 3.01, with the same bad result. Out of the box compilation with: make depend make installer fails with: ... gcc -Wp,-MT,extlinux.o,-MMD,.extlinux.o.d -W

From: "Hilliard, Jay" <Jay.Hilliard at disney.com> > We've had lots of trouble with nvidia's driver version 1.0-7174 which > was current last week. Yep, it's the first of a new series (7000 -- sounds like it'll support NV5x out-of-the-box), so that's expected. > Today there is a new driver (1.0-7664) which has fixed lots of issues > for us,

I have the following nis map (auto.facvs) * -vers=3 &:/disk1 Which allows hosts that have /disk1 exported to be mounted to /facvs/$hostname It works fine, but on Centos4, it allows me to cd /facvs/foo (where foo isn't a real host out there) I find it has mounted my local /disk1 as /facvs/foo. It seems to be ignoring the key in the map pertaining to the host if it's not a valid

This patch contains the following possible cleanups: - make needlessly global functions static - #if 0 the following unused global functions: - journal.c: __journal_internal_check - journal.c: journal_ack_err - remove the following write-only global variable: - journal.c: current_journal - remove the following unneeded EXPORT_SYMBOL's: - journal.c: journal_check_used_features -

Thank you for the great CentOS. When trying to update from 5.0 to 5.1, I get an error regarding the centos.plus kernel and headers, "[Errno -1] Package does not match intended download". What'd I do? The end of the yum update results below: Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 11 Package(s) Update

vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47 +---------------------------------- include/linux/mmu_context.h | 9 ++++++

vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47 +---------------------------------- include/linux/mmu_context.h | 9 ++++++

vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47

vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47

Helo, I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support. But when y do a : # yum update The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro I have tried with the http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it didn't take the right kernel :

If it wouldn't be too much trouble ... when a kernel security update notice is posted to the announcements list, would it be possible to indicate whether the centosplus kernel is also susceptible to the security issue being patched? I'm running the plus kernel now, and find myself wondering whether I will ever need to back off to the base kernel because of security issues. Or is it

I have optimized FLAC__fixed_compute_best_predictor_asm_ia32_mmx_cmov function and fixed bug when data_len == 0. Now the function is about 50% faster and flac -5 is about 5% faster on my box. I have tested it thoroughly, I think it can go to flac 1.0.4. -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/ia32/fixed_asm.nasm.orig 2002-01-26 19:05:12.000000000 +0100 +++

Hello, I would like to announce the semi-optimized oc_state_loop_filter_frag_rows It gains like 7% speedup. Unfortunately it has some issues: 1) wont compile on 64bit (I will fix it later hopefully) 2) is not yet fully optimized (instruction stalls) Here are the results. CPU: Athlon, speed 1466.91 MHz (estimated) Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Cycles outside of halt state) with a unit mask

vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47

vhost net module wants to do copy to/from user from a kernel thread, which needs use_mm (like what fs/aio has). Move that into mm/ and export to modules. Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- fs/aio.c | 47

Does anybody have any ideas on this? On our server that has been running 'rock-solid' with no crashes we have now had 3 kernel panics that each appear to have been triggered by the newly upgraded samba daemon. We used to run samba 3.0.21a for 'years' with no crashes. On May 26 we upgraded to 3.0.25 June 9 10:58:28 first crash kernel panic process involved according to log

Hello Everyone, I have this weird problem. I have 2.6.10-rc2-mm3 kernel with u32 compiled as module. I have the cls_u32 module loaded. I have different binaryes of tc, the one from iproute packaged from debian sarge, the Kaber''s one from trash.net, and also from another computer where u32 worked. When I run this: cyclops:~# /usr/local/sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 6: protocol ip

Deae R helpers, the problem I'm facing today is related to the manipulation of a string. The string is coming from a a porosimeter, whose control is under a complicate set-up of two computers One (running on DOS) is controlling directly the hardware, while the other (running on win XP) which process the data is connected to the first one via serial. I get the data from this last computer.

Hi Folks, I have some users who have a 64-bit CentOS 4.x install (current), which was installed with @Everything and then some annoying packages strategically removed (mrtg, pegasus*, mailman...) and they have decided they have a need for php5. I find on the web this instruction for doing this: http://www.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/Readme.txt So I try to do this, and I get: # rpm -e

Hello, Here is my first speedup patch. Like 10-11%. No IDCT yet. Please feel free to comment my code or even better think about improvements. :) I belive my routines are not so bad, maybe one day they will be even more faster. What needs to be optimized is the loop filter fuction. I have no ideas now how to do it. It does not leave much space for parallel stuff, copying memory from lot of