similar to: new sipura firmware

Hello, I had a partner of mine present a Centrex 21 brochure and ask how many of those features can I fulfill. There is nothing out of the ordinary, it's stuff like call hold, call forward, 3-way calling, etc. Has anyone assembled a how-to that shows how to configure PBX or Centrex type functionality? I found one in the voip-info wiki but only a couple of topics were filled out. Regards,

Hello, Is there any way to pass an H323 ID (resembles a sip user@blahblah) to an h323 gateway? Thank you in advance for your suggestions! Regards, Christopher J. Wolff, VP, CIO Broadband Laboratories http://www.bblabs.com

Regards, Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO Broadband Laboratories, Inc. http://www.bblabs.com Hello, I'm running a bone stock * box that only has SIP clients and about a dozen cisco T1 gateways. Some of the higher delay users complain that they occasionally hear echo on local and long distance calls, which eliminate the gateways as the source of the problem. Problem #2 is that it takes a long

Hi Everyone ;) I have posted something like this before but yeilded no solid help as of yet. I am new to * and havent even setup a box for it yet as to I have no clue what I should go ahead and buy before wasting a few $k. Im looking to setup * for my office with outbound calling only with some call agents, and also remote agents so they can work from home. At this time im not looking to

Hello, One of the Sipura 2k's I'm using has a dialtone that occasionally fades to static when the user picks up the line. Are there any settings that I can check that would affect this? Regards, Christopher

Hi, I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just fine, but I can't hear

Should a Linksys Sipura 2102 be configured with nat=yes even if it is on the local network? I have been having some troubles with a Linksys Sipura 2100 series, which suffers from NO AUDIO after a few calls.. Because it is on the same subnet as Asterisk it is configured with nat=no. When you think of it because the Sipura 2100 is a broadband router, the voice part may be considered as being behind

Voxilla news story: http://voxilla.com/voxstory84-nested-order0-threshold0.html Two new products * A Sipura 2000 in a linksys box: Linksys PAP2 Phone Adapter * A combination NAT router with 2 FXS ports: Linksys RT31P2 Broadband Router Jim James H. Thompson jht@lava.net

Hello Willy, Here is the dump from one of my bitcode files: 0000000 42 43 c0 de 21 0c 00 00 25 05 00 00 0b 82 20 00 As expected, 0x42 (= B), 0x43 (= C), xc0 and 0xde are in correct order. In your case, the first byte is read as 37 (= 0x25). I wonder why? When you check the bytes yourself, you get expected results. When the same bytes are read from Stream object, you get a different result (maybe

On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:51 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > > To support protected virtualization cio will need to make sure the > memory used for communication with the hypervisor is DMA memory. > > Let us introduce one global pool for cio. > > Our DMA pools are implemented as a gen_pool

On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:51 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > > To support protected virtualization cio will need to make sure the > memory used for communication with the hypervisor is DMA memory. > > Let us introduce one global pool for cio. > > Our DMA pools are implemented as a gen_pool

On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:11:13 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Halil, > > I just ran my toleration tests successfully on current HW for > this series. > > Michael Thanks Michael! May I add a Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> for each patch? > > On 12.06.19 13:12, Halil Pasic wrote: > > Enhanced virtualization

One of the key points that came up when I researched and wrote the "Five Things CIOs Should Know about Fighting Spam" article (http:// www.cio.com/article/28830) was that they should know the basics of how email works. Otherwise, said plenty of techies, the CIO won't have the first idea of what the email admin is complaining about. So I'm going to do my part. I'm

> As far as I know, ObjectFile is either COFF, ELF or MachO format, > statically compiled. But the pass manager for applying optimisation > passes works only on llvm-ir. I would not need to apply optimisations on the parts of the program in the object file. These are meant to be optimised beforehand. The only parts I want to run passes on are specific function that I know

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:23 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq > notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. > > Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors by > replacing the kmem_cache with a dma_cache and kalloc() with > cio_dma_zalloc().

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:23 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq > notifier bit vectors, because hypervisor needs to write these bits. > > Let us make sure we allocate DMA memory for the notifier bit vectors by > replacing the kmem_cache with a dma_cache and kalloc() with > cio_dma_zalloc().

This segfault occuring only under valgrind, in shell way, and in gdb way i have Invalid bitcode signature simple_scev_dynamic_array: /home/willy/apollo/llvm/include/llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h:258: storage_type *llvm::ErrorOr<llvm::Module *>::getStorage() [T = llvm::Module *]: Assertion `!HasError && "Cannot get value when an error exists!"' failed. Command terminated by

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:27:21 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:17:21 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:23 +0200 > > Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq > > >

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:27:21 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:17:21 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 13:51:23 +0200 > > Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Protected virtualization guests have to use shared pages for airq > > >

I recently purchased a Sipura 2000 and connected a phone to it which is connected to my asterisk box via sip. Calls to the Sipura 2000 work fine from another sip device connected through *, from either an fxo or fxs (via adtran channel bank connected to a T400P card) port. However, when a call comes in from the phone company over a T1 with em_w trunks, the phone on the Sipura will ring but I