similar to: Asterisk with UUI support ?

Hi, First, here is my config: Kernel version 2.4.25 on a Fedora distro, Asterisk and a Fritz! Isdn PCI Card (v2). I try to make the CAPI drivers deal with Asterisk but I can't try to figure out to get of this issue. As I see, Fritz modules are integrated with the kernel, so I directly loaded the 'hisax_fcpcipnp' module from it. I install also Capi modules by downloading archives of the

Can you put this patch on line? (I don't think it's too big...) In my mind, the main objective is to create a special field and force its value in chan_capi.c and check wether it goes through asterisk or not... What do you think of that? Regards ---------------------- > >jean-marie.goupil@telintrans.fr wrote: >> OK, so I'll do that... Is there any infos I need to know

Dear all, How do I set the UUI informations for outgoing calls and read the UUI information for incoming call in asterisk? Thanks in advance.. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100531/ffcceeee/attachment.htm

I tried that but it still doesn't work... I think I don't have the correct approach. Have I to install any ISDN drivers (=modules ?) BEFORE dealing with CAPI ? If yes, why shouldn't I use the hisax drivers (which are kernel ones) instead of fcpci drivers (which doesn't seems to work, by the way...) And finally, how is it possible to link the two modules together? As you can see,

right, so far, here is what I've done: I succeed in take in a new variable the UUS1 field sent with the connection request for incoming calls. It was quite simple afterall... (I just had to find where the data CMSG->Useruserdata is coming in chan_capi.c) Now I would like to know where this field is instanciated for outgoing calls in order to control this step? I am looking for that but I

Hello List, I need to connect with an Avaya PBX (this part is done), and i would like to get and send back User-to-User Information (UUI) with the call. The UUI need because I need to identify the call based on something witch is available on Asterisk and Avaya too. It is possible, or have a better solution? Anybody did it before? Thanks for the help! Zsotya

Hi, I came thru ISDN UUI (User-User Information) protocol which is defined in this RFC - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-17.txt But I don't understand how to use this with Asterisk. Any idea would be much appreciated. Thanks. Gopal. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, If the special handling in the meg2reg pass is to look for lifetime intrinsics, shouldn't it cast to <IntrisicInst> and then use getInstrinsicID to check for lifetime_start and lifetime_end ? The thing that I don't understand is the following piece of code, which finds all the users and cast it to <Instruction> then eraseFromParent(). How can this guarantee that it only

OK, so I'll do that... Is there any infos I need to know about chan_sip.c (because I suppose it's it that I need to play with)? Does anyone know an interesting website where I can find infos about UUI in ISDN (with CAPI maybe?) ? Thanks for your help.

Hello, I've seen that Nuance SIP audio provider supports additional information (parameters and extra headers) in SIP URIs, using the format: sip:user:password@host:port;uri-param1;uri-param2?header1&header2 For example, sip:1234@myserver.com;extra_header=Uui?Uui=Hello Does Asterisk support this format? Is there a way to retrieve the value of these additional headers, and then decide

hello! I'd like to use my asterisk-box on a p2p-line from my alcatel pbx. isdn4linux and capi works fine on a s0-line from the pbx, but i need more then 8 msns, cause i'd like to implement a voice-mail system and an extension to our "old" pbx with voip-phones. had anyone success using isdn4linux on a t0 (p2p) line (of course with an inexpensive passive card like my avm

Hi, I have great problems with my work in R. I look for to model the growth of fish. I have "Longitudinal data", a serie of repeated measures for each individual. Using the corresponding packages "nlme" in R. I treat to fit to the data different growth functions, wich were entered by me. Unfortunately for no it was arrived at the convergence, several error messages appeared. I

Hello, I'm having problems creating and using a selfStart model with nlme. Briefly, I've defined the model, a selfStart object, and then combined them to make a selfStart.default model. If I apply getInitial to the selfStart model, I get results. However, if I try usint it with nls or nlsList, these routines complain about a lack of initial conditions. If someone could point out

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com> > wrote: >> >> In case of MIPS O32 ABI we have to find a matching R_MIPS_LO16 >> relocation to calculate R_MIPS_HI16 one because R_MIPS_HI16 uses >> combined addend (AHI << 16) + (short)ALO where AHI is

Hello. I'm having problems at instruction selection with my back end with the following basic-block due to a vector add with immediate constant vector (obtained by vectorizing a simple C program doing vector sum map): vector.ph: ; preds = %vector.memcheck50 %.splatinsert = insertelement <8 x i64> undef, i64 %i.07.unr, i32 0

Hi, I am having some issues with how some of the instructions are being legalized. So this is my intial basic block. The area of concern is the last three instructions. I will pick and choose debug output to keep this small. SelectionDAG has 36 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t6: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg507 t2: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg17

I'm attempting to create an array of treatment comparisons for modelling data generation. This involves comparison of one treatment (c2) with another (c3), relative to a common comparator (c1). Attached code gives me the correct array but need to remove duplicates. Duplicates relate only to c2 and c3 such that I need to remove r3 because c2 and c3 are same as r1 with c2 and c3 swapped r5

Hi all, Our target does not have native support for 64-bit integers, so we rely on library calls for certain operations (like sdiv). We recently ran into a problem where these operations that are expanded to library calls aren't maintaining the proper ordering in relation to other chains in the DAG. The following snippet of a DAG demonstrates the problem. t0: ch = EntryToken t2:

Is there any way to get it to delay this optimization where it goes from this: Initial selection DAG: BB#0 'bclr64:entry' SelectionDAG has 14 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg0 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg1 t6: i64 = sub t4, Constant:i64<1> t7: i64 = shl Constant:i64<1>, t6

But isn't kinda silly that we transform to xor and then we transform it back. What is the advantage in doing so? Also, since we do that method, I now have to introduce setcc patterns for i1 values, instead of being able to just use logical pattern operators like not. -Dilan On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:00 AM Dilan Manatunga <manatunga at gmail.com> wrote: > For some reason I